I'm out of town on business, so I'm going to try to do a core dump on my thoughts tonight. With a little luck I'll be able to post again sometime on Friday, but it may be late Saturday before I check in again.
Elias_the_thief wrote:As a sidenote, I will not be able to post again til sunday.
In that case,
unvote
. No sense in risking a premature hammer, especially since a big part of my rationale in voting you was to keep you talking.
vollkan wrote:Elias, I agree, the case on Korlash is better. You were made to claim because of the numbers on you. Additionally (and I was waiting to see how this Gemelli issue unfolded), Gemelli's vote strikes me as dreadfully rushed. He has Kor at number 1 suspicion and then puts on his vote for you for this effectively semantic debate about you delaying your vote; the only change being that Orig cast his vote. I agree, your actions are odd, but I don't think they are scummy-odd. I'll admit here that I did think Gemelli's actions could be bussing of Elias, and I still consider it viable.
As I've said twice now, Elias and Korlash are very close to each other on my suspect list. I've been struggling to distinguish between the two players, and part of what I've been playing with is to see how each reacts to extra pressure. So I brought up things that I found suspicious about each player in turn, and voted. What I've found is that:
* Regardless of who I am voting for, Elias and Korlash have both continued to advance the prospect that I am scum with the other.
* Korlash's reaction to being voted for has been somewhat muted. He's seemed to deflate a bit, and only defended himself half-heartedly.
* Since D3 started, Elias has (with one exception) only posted to respond to direct suspicion of him. When voted or pressed, he posts multiple times in short succession, and becomes argumentative and hostile. When there is no pressure on him, he does not contribute to the discussion.
The first point is the one I find most interesting. I am assuming that at least one of the Elias and Korlash is Mafia. But both are pushing a case against me at this point. The tenor of the cases is different -- Korlash's case boils down to a simple process of elimination, whereas Elias's case seems to be based purely on my posts directed to him. However, both Elias and Korlash have made the statement that "if [Elias/Korlash] is scum, Gemelli is most likely scum too." I'll come back to this in a second.
Now I do not expect any of you to take my statement that I am pro-town as a given, but it is absolutely driving my perspective on what we should do D3. Let me explain.
First, I put it to you that if we have NOT identified all of the Mafia in the top four spots on the consensus list, we will most likely lose the game. There is significant reason to look at myself, Korlash, Elias, and Lucienne as Mafia suspects at this point. If Vollkan, AlyG, or Originality are mafia, then frankly I think they have outplayed the town well and truly already, and our chances of winning will come down to whether a rogue Mafioso makes a major error near the endgame. Because that's a depressing (and I think unlikely) scenario, I'm not going to focus on it. I do think that we've pinned the Mafia in our top four, and I think that our consensus list reflects that this is most people's opinion.
Now: from my perspective, there are not four probable candidates for Mafia ... there are three. This is a perspective I assume is shared by the other pro-town player remaining among the four top suspects.
The town can make one mislynch without putting the Mafia in position to win.
Therefore, from where I stand, the best course of action for the town is to lynch the top three players on the suspect list one after the other.
Assuming that two of those players are mafia, and the other is town, this wins the game for us at the possible cost of a single mislynch.
Now, for those of you who have me at #2 or #3 on the suspect list, I don't expect you to buy into this approach
I'm just trying to explain why I've been going back and forth between Elias and Korlash on D3. I believe that at least one of them is absolutely scum. If we push to lynch one of them, and that player is confirmed pro-town, to me the conclusion would be that Lucienne is the final remaining scum. I assume that the other pro-town player in the top four has a similar perspective, but with my name substituted into the mix.
That being said, I've put myself into a tough spot. Since I've made a commitment to being an active poster in this game, I have given the Mafia more content to attack, making me an easier target to take the rap. And because I have pushed on both Korlash and Elias in turn, I have left myself vulnerable to both of them on two fronts. When I voted Korlash, he implied that I was doing so in support of my scumbuddy Elias. When I voted Elias, he implied that this was clear evidence of my scumbuddy alignment with Korlash. And lately it has been suggested that my focus on Elias OR Korlash is simply bussing. I don't think I can continue posting my opinions without continuing to draw this kind of heat from one side or the other, but so it goes.
Anyway: unless you are willing to accept the possibility of three mafia remaining in the game, it should be obvious that either Elias's or Korlash's scumbuddy hypothesis is false (I surely can't be scumbuddies with BOTH of them). If one of the two is scum, that player is clearly trying to set me up to take a fall as the most obvious pro-town target.
Coming back to the point I made earlier, the fact that BOTH Elias and Korlash are taking the same stance on me suggests that the odds of them being aligned with each other are fairly high. And if we agree that at least one of the two players is scum, I think it's worthwhile to lynch them both in succession. If one is town, the other is guaranteed to be scum. Again: if we limit ourselves to no more than one more mislynch in the game, we win.
Again, that's just my perspective ... I'm interested to hear reactions from the rest of you. Except for the scum