In post 349, nydushermain wrote:I'm tired of you and your attempts at "logic" when you're not even reading what I'm saying. At this point, I just want anyone lynched for a role flip and then see what their interactions have been.
Yep, no, you're not getting away with evading this.
Do you think I am scum? Yes or no?
Refusal to answer will be treated as a scum claim.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Refusal to answer will be treated as a scum claim.
@nydushermain
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 349, nydushermain wrote:I'm tired of you and your attempts at "logic" when you're not even reading what I'm saying. At this point, I just want anyone lynched for a role flip and then see what their interactions have been.
Yep, no, you're not getting away with evading this.
Do you think I am scum? Yes or no?
Refusal to answer will be treated as a scum claim.
I'm leaning scum on you but I could be wrong. If I had a choice between anyone in this game and you, I'd vote you (with the exception of charloux).
In post 355, Alisae wrote:Ya know what I said earlier about not hoping onto any other wagons? Yeah....About that...
Lynch Nyd today, lynch Pep tomorrow.
VOTE: nydushermain
For the record, I think that pep is leaning town so I'm probably going to sleep soon. If I wake up and I'm dead, despite not having given a read on pep because of prodding/replacement, I'm putting him in town.
In post 356, nydushermain wrote:I'm leaning scum on you but I could be wrong. If I had a choice between anyone in this game and you, I'd vote you (with the exception of charloux).
You don't get to try to evade giving an opinion about me. That's something scum likes to do to keep their options open. Right now, do you think I am more likely to be scum than town? Yes, or no?
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Nyd, at this point, you're being anti-town. If you were town, you would want to coperate with people like me. But you're still attacking Accountant. You know it's not working. I don't think you even did what I told you to do with accountant. Additionally, you just want pressure to be off you, but there is no way that is happening currently. You put all the attention on yourself, but that would be good if you weren't attacking your IC the whole game and doing town things.
What is stopping you from voting DBW now if you want to hammer him so badly? I bet you were probably waiting for me to take that to L-1.
In post 356, nydushermain wrote:I'm leaning scum on you but I could be wrong. If I had a choice between anyone in this game and you, I'd vote you (with the exception of charloux).
You don't get to try to evade giving an opinion about me. That's something scum likes to do to keep their options open. Right now, do you think I am more likely to be scum than town? Yes, or no?
Uhh, I openly admit that I'm keeping my options open. Why? Because I could be wrong? And reread the thing you quoted. Like I said, you're in this dumb ass tunnel on my thinking that no matter what I do, it's from a scum perspective. You're like skipping words that I say and if you're town, you should clear your damn mind, and reread my damn ISO.
In post 359, Alisae wrote:Nyd, at this point, you're being anti-town. If you were town, you would want to coperate with people like me. But you're still attacking Accountant. You know it's not working. I don't think you even did what I told you to do with accountant. Additionally, you just want pressure to be off you, but there is no way that is happening currently. You put all the attention on yourself, but that would be good if you weren't attacking your IC the whole game and doing town things.
What is stopping you from voting DBW now if you want to hammer him so badly? I bet you were probably waiting for me to take that to L-1.
I'm not even the one instigating this fight. He's the one that's not backing down.
I've been willing to take a step back and think about it but he didn't stop so you can pretend that I'm the one that keeps being anti town but it's him. So chill out.
In post 359, Alisae wrote:Nyd, at this point, you're being anti-town. If you were town, you would want to coperate with people like me. But you're still attacking Accountant. You know it's not working. I don't think you even did what I told you to do with accountant. Additionally, you just want pressure to be off you, but there is no way that is happening currently. You put all the attention on yourself, but that would be good if you weren't attacking your IC the whole game and doing town things.
What is stopping you from voting DBW now if you want to hammer him so badly? I bet you were probably waiting for me to take that to L-1.
I'm not even the one instigating this fight. He's the one that's not backing down.
What is this? Third grade? If he is not backing down, that just says you have conf bias. And I'm pretty sure this is wrong anyways.
In post 356, nydushermain wrote:I'm leaning scum on you but I could be wrong. If I had a choice between anyone in this game and you, I'd vote you (with the exception of charloux).
You don't get to try to evade giving an opinion about me. That's something scum likes to do to keep their options open. Right now, do you think I am more likely to be scum than town? Yes, or no?
Uhh, I openly admit that I'm keeping my options open. Why? Because I could be wrong? And reread the thing you quoted. Like I said, you're in this dumb ass tunnel on my thinking that no matter what I do, it's from a scum perspective. You're like skipping words that I say and if you're town, you should clear your damn mind, and reread my damn ISO.
Yes, or no?
Answer the question. I've asked you this question 3 times already, and you keep shying away from it. I'm going to keep pressing you until I get a definitive yes or no answer.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 356, nydushermain wrote:I'm leaning scum on you but I could be wrong. If I had a choice between anyone in this game and you, I'd vote you (with the exception of charloux).
You don't get to try to evade giving an opinion about me. That's something scum likes to do to keep their options open. Right now, do you think I am more likely to be scum than town? Yes, or no?
Uhh, I openly admit that I'm keeping my options open. Why? Because I could be wrong? And reread the thing you quoted. Like I said, you're in this dumb ass tunnel on my thinking that no matter what I do, it's from a scum perspective. You're like skipping words that I say and if you're town, you should clear your damn mind, and reread my damn ISO.
Yes, or no?
Answer the question. I've asked you this question 3 times already, and you keep shying away from it. I'm going to keep pressing you until I get a definitive yes or no answer.
In post 359, Alisae wrote:Nyd, at this point, you're being anti-town. If you were town, you would want to coperate with people like me. But you're still attacking Accountant. You know it's not working. I don't think you even did what I told you to do with accountant. Additionally, you just want pressure to be off you, but there is no way that is happening currently. You put all the attention on yourself, but that would be good if you weren't attacking your IC the whole game and doing town things.
What is stopping you from voting DBW now if you want to hammer him so badly? I bet you were probably waiting for me to take that to L-1.
I'm not even the one instigating this fight. He's the one that's not backing down.
What is this? Third grade? If he is not backing down, that just says you have conf bias. And I'm pretty sure this is wrong anyways.
If you're going to take a step back, just do it.
I'm giving a response to his questions. Not even asking him more questions. I'm not trying to make the conversation move further.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Why are you so afraid of giving me a yes or no answer?
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 368, Alisae wrote:Accountant, what are your reads? I think I asked you this already, but you kept on giving your attention to Nyd.
Ramcius and Mewtaph strong town, Alisae townlean, DBW, Pep and Gamma null, Charloux scumlean.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 368, Alisae wrote:Accountant, what are your reads? I think I asked you this already, but you kept on giving your attention to Nyd.
Ramcius and Mewtaph strong town, Alisae townlean, DBW, Pep and Gamma null, Charloux scumlean.
Why the null read on Pep?
Because he hasn't said anything indicative of alignment rather than newness to mafia.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.