Current Vote Count:
With 13 votes available, it takes 7 votes to hammer.
Creeps20 is V/LA until 1/2.
Countdown: (expired on 2016-12-26 21:00:00)
What does this mean?In post 9014, MathBlade wrote:N2/N4 Andrius who was N1 my notes aren't in front of me
Just because YOU do it, doesn't mean everyone else does (which you acknowledged in your first few words).In post 9015, Almost50 wrote:To each their own, but I feel the natural thing to do if you were not faking was to keep your vote on me until you've decided on whom to vote instead. I only unvote when I'm no longer sure about wanting to lynch someone AND can't find another appropriate target for my vote. Otherwise I just simply switch my vote from x to why. It is the UNVOTE that concerns me (coupled with a continued push/discredit process).In post 8977, SirCakez wrote:Not really much of an impact to be had, + unvoting =/= not pushing him anymore, I just want to reconsider wagon options
In post 8995, MathBlade wrote:You mean I don't want to lynch who I believe to be my flavor's girlfriend? Omg what a shock.
Leonshade.In post 8954, Nahdia wrote:In post 8806, Nahdia wrote:Creeps, who was targeted by your slot Night 2?
N1 SirCakez gave an item to XIn post 9026, SirCakez wrote:What does this mean?In post 9014, MathBlade wrote:N2/N4 Andrius who was N1 my notes aren't in front of meJust because YOU do it, doesn't mean everyone else does (which you acknowledged in your first few words).In post 9015, Almost50 wrote:To each their own, but I feel the natural thing to do if you were not faking was to keep your vote on me until you've decided on whom to vote instead. I only unvote when I'm no longer sure about wanting to lynch someone AND can't find another appropriate target for my vote. Otherwise I just simply switch my vote from x to why. It is the UNVOTE that concerns me (coupled with a continued push/discredit process).In post 8977, SirCakez wrote:Not really much of an impact to be had, + unvoting =/= not pushing him anymore, I just want to reconsider wagon options
A bunch of people who I think are probtown (i;e Jae) think you are town which is also a concern to me.
Oh, I forgot to tell you. Roles are NAI. I only judge by how people play.In post 8995, MathBlade wrote:You mean I don't want to lynch who I believe to be my flavor's girlfriend? Omg what a shock.
x is the Firebringer slotIn post 9029, MathBlade wrote:N1 SirCakez gave an item to XIn post 9026, SirCakez wrote:What does this mean?In post 9014, MathBlade wrote:N2/N4 Andrius who was N1 my notes aren't in front of meJust because YOU do it, doesn't mean everyone else does (which you acknowledged in your first few words).In post 9015, Almost50 wrote:To each their own, but I feel the natural thing to do if you were not faking was to keep your vote on me until you've decided on whom to vote instead. I only unvote when I'm no longer sure about wanting to lynch someone AND can't find another appropriate target for my vote. Otherwise I just simply switch my vote from x to why. It is the UNVOTE that concerns me (coupled with a continued push/discredit process).In post 8977, SirCakez wrote:Not really much of an impact to be had, + unvoting =/= not pushing him anymore, I just want to reconsider wagon options
A bunch of people who I think are probtown (i;e Jae) think you are town which is also a concern to me.
N2 SirCakez gave an item to Andrius
N3 SirCakez fell asleep
N4 SirCakez was RB'd but said he targeted Andrius
N5 SirCakez clearly targeted me.
What is X?
OK. "I can read PVIn post 9007, Nahdia wrote:Just preempting what I know is gonna happen:
A50 & Ank; you need to explain why PV is town without just saying "I can read PV, its meta".
....I am bulletproof *facepalms* Vigging me is as effective as vigging a toadstool.In post 9035, JaeReed wrote:MathBlade or Cakez are my preferred lynches and I'm fine with the other being vigged.
Thanks. Do you have any indication that you KNOW your action was fully resolved?In post 9028, Creeps20 wrote:Leonshade.In post 8954, Nahdia wrote:In post 8806, Nahdia wrote:Creeps, who was targeted by your slot Night 2?
That took a long time to find
Don't call yourself hat. You're a cuteyIn post 9036, MathBlade wrote:Vigging me is as effective as vigging a toadstool.
Great so you want to policy me because I tricked people in Shadowrun lovely. keep up the good scumhunting. (The last sentence is sarcastic)In post 9038, JaeReed wrote:No, I don't give a crap if you check me or not because you're going to lie about the result regardless. Everything you're doing is pushing things to try and make it fit your scumreads/townreads. You are literally trying to bend the events of this game to your will and it's scummy af and I'm pissed I didn't catch you from it in Shadowrun but I'll be damned if I let you do it to me again. In Shadowrun I handwaved a lot of things as "Math is unreasonable" but the difference is there's some logic to your unreasonableness as town, and there's none here.
They please.In post 9039, SirCakez wrote:Jae I'm not seeing a difference between Math's game here and both town/scum games elsewhere. He plays pretty much the same regardless of alignment from what I've seen.
Could you explain what "logic he has as town" is not present here?
Not a cutey.In post 9040, Almost50 wrote:Don't call yourself hat. You're a cuteyIn post 9036, MathBlade wrote:Vigging me is as effective as vigging a toadstool.
ApologiesIn post 9039, SirCakez wrote:Jae I'm not seeing a difference between Math's game here and both town/scum games elsewhere. They play pretty much the same regardless of alignment from what I've seen.
Could you explain what "logic they have as town" is not present here?
That's not what I said and you know it. This is again twisting things. Twisting things is a scum move from you.In post 9041, MathBlade wrote:Great so you want to policy me because I tricked people in Shadowrun lovely. keep up the good scumhunting. (The last sentence is sarcastic)In post 9038, JaeReed wrote:No, I don't give a crap if you check me or not because you're going to lie about the result regardless. Everything you're doing is pushing things to try and make it fit your scumreads/townreads. You are literally trying to bend the events of this game to your will and it's scummy af and I'm pissed I didn't catch you from it in Shadowrun but I'll be damned if I let you do it to me again. In Shadowrun I handwaved a lot of things as "Math is unreasonable" but the difference is there's some logic to your unreasonableness as town, and there's none here.
All you said is I am twisting things and did that in Shadowrun.In post 9046, JaeReed wrote:That's not what I said and you know it. This is again twisting things. Twisting things is a scum move from you.In post 9041, MathBlade wrote:Great so you want to policy me because I tricked people in Shadowrun lovely. keep up the good scumhunting. (The last sentence is sarcastic)In post 9038, JaeReed wrote:No, I don't give a crap if you check me or not because you're going to lie about the result regardless. Everything you're doing is pushing things to try and make it fit your scumreads/townreads. You are literally trying to bend the events of this game to your will and it's scummy af and I'm pissed I didn't catch you from it in Shadowrun but I'll be damned if I let you do it to me again. In Shadowrun I handwaved a lot of things as "Math is unreasonable" but the difference is there's some logic to your unreasonableness as town, and there's none here.
And -ONCE AGAIN- Math is arguing for the sake of arguing. I clearly said we will NOT be lynching SC (yes, it was all a sarcastic post mimicking Math's own play, but so was the last part).In post 9031, MathBlade wrote:Highway. His play isn't scummy.