In post 131, Aeronaut wrote: In post 91, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:@Sofiel - I jumped on it quickly because he overreacted to what appeared on the surface to be a weak vote. I had a reason to vote him but decided it would be better to see what he would do if I poked him.
In post 78, ThinkBig wrote: In post 77, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I suspect you read that the mafia have no daytalk in your own role pm. Did you read my post?
I've played enough newbie games on here to know that scum team doesn't have day talk. Read the sample PM. You are grasping for straws in a very scummy way.
VOTE: ssbm
This is not a townie reaction to a single weak vote. If he were town he would ignore my vote because it poses no threat to him, because nobody would follow after a weak vote like that. Scum, however, are very paranoid of being lynched and will sometimes overreact to these kinds of votes. I think this is what he did, and that's further confirming my feeling that he is scum, which is why my vote will stay.
I disagree. Your vote on him was pretty baseless and opportunistic; whether you agree or not isn't what's important. What is important is the reaction, really, as you were saying.
Thinkbig saw that it was kind of a baseless reason to be parking your vote, and called you out on it. I feel like as town, this makes a lot of sense; a scum reaction probably would have been less about attacking/pressuring you and more about defending himself. E.g., it probably would have been a scum reaction if he was busy defending himself trying to prove that he just read the OP instead of his own PM.
town is hunting for scum,
scum is defending themselves
.
Thinkbig may have disagreed with why I was SRing him, but I don't think his response to my vote was towny at all. A town reaction would be to disregard something that nobody else would follow. I feel like nobody is reading the entirety of that exchange, because you're probably the third person who thinks my original reason for voting TB was actually because I thought he read about daytalk in his own role PM. I explained the reason I voted him after I was done testing him. Also I strongly disagree with the bolded, if scum just defends themselves and never hunts for "scum" they would lose a lot more games than they do
Scum aren't scum hunting; they're trying to look like they're scum hunting.
If it were me in TB's position, I would have absolutely been the first to call it out, because it is very reachy (if it wasn't a reaction test), especially being a newbie game where newbies will believe things that other players wouldn't. To me, no player would ignore that in the first place (in fact, I feel like him ignoring it would be a huge scum tell). Instead of ignoring it, I think it makes more sense to look at what his reaction to it actually was, which was an attack on not even you, but the shit argument.
I'm also generally pretty skeptical of "reaction tests" in things like newbie games, but that's probably more of a me problem. I just think it's so easy to try some shit push and hope for the best, and when it doesn't pan out just call it a reaction test.
In post 131, Aeronaut wrote: In post 105, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:What does Idem mean? "I don't even mind"?
Why would you unvote someone and not ask anyone else a direct question? Are you even trying to find scum? Do you have any reads of your own or are you just waiting for popular opinion to form so you can mold your reads to fit that?
VOTE: Zekromaster
I'm conflicted here, because I absolutely agree with this post, but it also looks like ssbm jumping off of that ThinkBig wagon ASAP because it sure was a bad look.
ThinkBig was my strongest SR at the time. This was much scummier than TBs reaction to my vote. If he had remained calm under pressure I would have looked elsewhere for a scummy player. What was so bad about voting TB? I explained the real reason in
81.
Explained above, but TLDR his reaction was the same reaction any player would have made. Scumreading him for it is just as reachy as the test was.
In post 131, Aeronaut wrote: In post 123, lucca261 wrote:liking RB for town more and more.
@zekrom, if you had to bet the game on one player being scum, right now, who would you choose?
@sofiel, same question.
@friend, you got any real reasons to vote end right now or is the vote still random? because you fosed ssbm and rb, but instead of voting them, kept a random vote. why is that?
@ssbm, are you going to scumhunt at all?
i got a weird feeling about Sofiel's #113. I feel like he wanted to vote The_End, but didn't wanted to be the third vote on the wagon, so he voted Zekrom instead. The logic is weird. He thinks that pointing out his decision is opportunistic scum. But he didn't think I was scum for doing it. I feel like he was looking for an excuse for voting Zekrom.
--
UNVOTE: Think
keeping voting Think right now is useless, since he is going to be V/LA.
i'll unvote and wait for the answers.
The questions in the post seem kind of boring, random, and baseless. Why ask that to ssbm, when there's like half the game that's made a lot less of an effort to do anything?
I get the feeling lucca is very suspicious of me and hesitates to say it. I felt like he saw my reaction test and decided to try one of his own on me when he offered to sheep me on someone who he thought was null.
Well do you think that's a scum motivation? You could be right but I don't know if it's AI. If he's actually suspicious, wouldn't that be townie?
Hi, my name is friend computer and I sure will do things soon! Also, here's me reiterating a generic universal read.