Do they plan on keeping both Bridgewater and Bradford? If so they really should have should have left it open Bridgewater is not a bad QB. If not they also should have left it open for the sake of trade values
How much money is Bradford gonna cost them when he is on the roster in 2017? How many draft picks did they lose for him again?
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
Then my point on the value on that match remains true. Can't use it to judge how they will be against OAK
Given injuries to backup QBs I'm not sure who will be in for each team in the game.
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
In post 654, PokerFace wrote:How much money is Bradford gonna cost them when he is on the roster in 2017? How many draft picks did they lose for him again?
Thought his contract is up this year? Maybe next.
They gave up their 1st rounder for 2017
PokerFace wrote:Given injuries to backup QBs I'm not sure who will be in for each team in the game.
I don't even remember who the Texans starter is anymore
Picks are a first this year, 4th rounder this year. Bradford's under contract for only one year, at $14m plus a $4m roster bonus. Bridgewater's cap hit next year is like $2.1m. Peterson is interesting to look at, they've got roughly $23m in cap space right now, they could save $18 by cutting Peterson fairly early in the off-season.
Chloroform girl, how have you been?
Don't let me catch you sleeping again
You're only alive because I like you
It's been three years since you've seen the sunlight
But I know you're having fun
Bound, gagged and chained up in my basement
My thinking is that the Vikes will keep Bradford around until training camp at the earliest so they can see how Bridgewater's recovering. After all, Bridgewater suffered a potential career ending or changing injury, assuming he does make a comeback, he may not be the same player he was before. If he's ready to come back for the start of next season, they can wait for someone else's QB to get hurt and offload Bradford to them for an exorbitant price. If he's not ready, and shows no sign of being ready, then they keep both because Bridgewater's contract is cheap and re-evaluate next off-season. If they sign #Bradford to a long-term extension, that probably means Bridgewater is done, at least as a Viking and possibly a pro.
Chloroform girl, how have you been?
Don't let me catch you sleeping again
You're only alive because I like you
It's been three years since you've seen the sunlight
But I know you're having fun
Bound, gagged and chained up in my basement
That is what vikings should do. Will they do it? Don't know. For all I know they could hire Chip Kelly as their new offensive coordinator. /Bad Joke
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
Chloroform girl, how have you been?
Don't let me catch you sleeping again
You're only alive because I like you
It's been three years since you've seen the sunlight
But I know you're having fun
Bound, gagged and chained up in my basement
(1:55:11 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's ok drench
(1:55:21 AM) ahallucinogenic: it's perfectly normal for young children to walk in on their parents making love
(1:55:31 AM) Drench394: i can't wait
I'm obviously not a doctor but from what I've understood is that Bridgewaters injury could be more than a just one year thing.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
shaft.ed wrote:so does this help or hurt Derek Carr for MVP?
ftfy
I would think it would strengthen it. Personally I think it should go to Matt Ryan
Patriots don't need Brady to win. Steelers don't need Bell to win.
Raiders do need Carr, but I feel giving it to him would almost be like pitying the raiders. Also you give him an award when he can't enjoy award and playing? Feels really odd.
Dak and Zeke I feel cancel each other out. Dallas obviously needed a QB and needed Zeke. So votes from one should cancel out votes for the other.
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
I'm sad the Giants lost. But this does mean the Packers have stolen their energy and are the best candidate to knock off the Cowboys.
Makes me think a lot less of Odell Beckham. Dude talks mad shit all the time and is a total diva, then when his team finally gets a chance back in the playoffs he quite literally drops the ball.
I think the death knell for the Giants is that they didn't have a running game. In 2007 and 2011 they had a baller-ass running game. So this year they had to rely on Eli and the WRs. Eli played okay, his WRs didn't deliver at all.
Steelers going all the way baby! Offense is back to where it was at the start of the season and then some!
