I'm noticing a pattern.
Pine, thoughts?
I'm noticing a pattern.
VOTE: One Punch Vanilla Townie
Why?In post 278, boring wrote:I think there's probably a scum between RC and Fire. I think there' probably a scum in the Alz-Human-Cloud-Alisae cluster.
I subbed into a town slot after 1-shot had let it get up to L-1. If it weren't D3, I'd have maybe understood it as a policy lynch. Anyway, he started that game suggesting no lynch too. Made a grand total of 17 posts in three game days, mostly shady, and then finally failed to pick up a prod. Pine was scum that game, and was able to use it as an easy "scum-hunting" cover.In post 277, Human Sequencer wrote:VOTE: One Punch Vanilla Townie
because its alisae's voteIn post 278, boring wrote:I think there's probably a scum between RC and Fire. I think there' probably a scum in the Alz-Human-Cloud-Alisae cluster.
Gerryoat and Lycan, can you expand on Human and Cloud, respectively?
Cloud, why Fire?
Because of the pouting. I think if it was TvT, things would escalate until they were either both sorted or one lynched. At least, that's what I see in TvT most often. They're just sitting there with votes on each other, being passive-aggressive. I'm not sure which one (maybe there are two anti-town teams?) but it really looks to me like at least one of them is walking the line between saving face, and not pushing it too far. If I just went by the altercation, I'd say the scum is Fire, but the aftermath is seeing a fair amount of petulance from RC.In post 280, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:Why?In post 278, boring wrote:I think there's probably a scum between RC and Fire. I think there' probably a scum in the Alz-Human-Cloud-Alisae cluster.
Without posting to post, why is there scum in Fire or RC? Day 1 situations like this normally land TvT. As it stands their both NAI for me, what stood out for you in particular?
I don't care about the Cloud Human situation yet though.
Im not sure where i suggested that i townread alisaeIn post 283, boring wrote:Because of the pouting. I think if it was TvT, things would escalate until they were either both sorted or one lynched. At least, that's what I see in TvT most often. They're just sitting there with votes on each other, being passive-aggressive. I'm not sure which one (maybe there are two anti-town teams?) but it really looks to me like at least one of them is walking the line between saving face, and not pushing it too far. If I just went by the altercation, I'd say the scum is Fire, but the aftermath is seeing a fair amount of petulance from RC.In post 280, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:Why?In post 278, boring wrote:I think there's probably a scum between RC and Fire. I think there' probably a scum in the Alz-Human-Cloud-Alisae cluster.
Without posting to post, why is there scum in Fire or RC? Day 1 situations like this normally land TvT. As it stands their both NAI for me, what stood out for you in particular?
I don't care about the Cloud Human situation yet though.
p-edit: are you townreading Alisae, then? If so, why?
Why do you rule out the SvS? I really don't think it's the case but neither do you obviously.In post 283, boring wrote:Because of the pouting. I think if it was TvT, things would escalate until they were either both sorted or one lynched. At least, that's what I see in TvT most often. They're just sitting there with votes on each other, being passive-aggressive. I'm not sure which one (maybe there are two anti-town teams?) but it really looks to me like at least one of them is walking the line between saving face, and not pushing it too far. If I just went by the altercation, I'd say the scum is Fire, but the aftermath is seeing a fair amount of petulance from RC.
1-Shot Can you justify your need to force a no lynch ? This is one of my pet peevesIn post 287, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:Why do you rule out the SvS? I really don't think it's the case but neither do you obviously.In post 283, boring wrote:Because of the pouting. I think if it was TvT, things would escalate until they were either both sorted or one lynched. At least, that's what I see in TvT most often. They're just sitting there with votes on each other, being passive-aggressive. I'm not sure which one (maybe there are two anti-town teams?) but it really looks to me like at least one of them is walking the line between saving face, and not pushing it too far. If I just went by the altercation, I'd say the scum is Fire, but the aftermath is seeing a fair amount of petulance from RC.
I also don't really like your reasoning, however you must have experience to think of it this way. Can you supply a game with the scenerio of TvT above to a game of TvS?
I will have give you the FoS as I really hate such early comments on alignments in these situations.
In post 285, CloudKicker wrote: Im not sure where i suggested that i townread alisae
Why would you sheep him if you're not townreading him?
I suggest you read the game thenIn post 289, boring wrote:In post 285, CloudKicker wrote: Im not sure where i suggested that i townread alisaeWhy would you sheep him if you're not townreading him?
Obviously, I didn't rule SvS out. I just don't think they'd do that on the same team. The link I provided about you includes a TvS example, actually (Garmr and Pine). This one is TvT (Shadow and Eager) http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=68600. If you're not just a troll, and you think my reasoning is scummy, an FOS isn't going to cut it.In post 287, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:Why do you rule out the SvS? I really don't think it's the case but neither do you obviously.In post 283, boring wrote:Because of the pouting. I think if it was TvT, things would escalate until they were either both sorted or one lynched. At least, that's what I see in TvT most often. They're just sitting there with votes on each other, being passive-aggressive. I'm not sure which one (maybe there are two anti-town teams?) but it really looks to me like at least one of them is walking the line between saving face, and not pushing it too far. If I just went by the altercation, I'd say the scum is Fire, but the aftermath is seeing a fair amount of petulance from RC.
I also don't really like your reasoning, however you must have experience to think of it this way. Can you supply a game with the scenerio of TvT above to a game of TvS?
I will have give you the FoS as I really hate such early comments on alignments in these situations.
Why are you asking Pine specificly?
I'm sorry that this is one of your pet peeves.In post 288, CloudKicker wrote:1-Shot Can you justify your need to force a no lynch ? This is one of my pet peeves
Its how bad players playIn post 294, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:I'm sorry that this is one of your pet peeves.In post 288, CloudKicker wrote:1-Shot Can you justify your need to force a no lynch ? This is one of my pet peeves
Still want to understand your reasoning, im expecting a nai answer thoIn post 294, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:I'm sorry that this is one of your pet peeves.In post 288, CloudKicker wrote:1-Shot Can you justify your need to force a no lynch ? This is one of my pet peeves
My apologies, my wording there was incorrect. Why isn't it same team SvS?In post 291, boring wrote:Obviously, I didn't rule SvS out. I just don't think they'd do that on the same team. The link I provided about you includes a TvS example, actually (Garmr and Pine). This one is TvT (Shadow and Eager) viewtopic.php?f=53&t=68600. If you're not just a troll, and you think my reasoning is scummy, an FOS isn't going to cut it.
p-edit: Cloud, "he made me lol" doesn't give you magic underwear. Unless there's an actual game mechanic forcing you to vote where Alisae is voting, you remain accountable for your votes.
I'll wait for others to discuss the situation first, then I'll put your question first.In post 296, CloudKicker wrote:Still want to understand your reasoning, im expecting a nai answer thoIn post 294, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:I'm sorry that this is one of your pet peeves.In post 288, CloudKicker wrote:1-Shot Can you justify your need to force a no lynch ? This is one of my pet peeves
I wouldn't consider having a pet peeve making you a bad player. But I'm not here to debate that.In post 295, CloudKicker wrote:Its how bad players play