, because of the fact scum are not jumping onto karnos
In post 1442, Titus wrote:I'm at the end of day 1, and I'm leaning towards a Prana flip.
What was your N1 result Pine?
You basically went from prana is town to prana is scum with out explaining it
In post 1428, Titus wrote:Alisae - 3 (PranaDevil, nydushermain, shannon)
XnadrojX - 2 (karnos, Alisae)
karnos - 2 (Garmr, XnadrojX)
Garmr and the three names on Alisae have major scumpoints to here, but there is little to zero chance that there are two scum on the Alisae wagon, as they'd likely jump onto X wagon
Also what kind of logic is this i'm scum for starting the wagon on scum?
Your vca and your scum reads contridict each other as well. (from post 1442) for example and these two posts
In post 1428, Titus wrote:Alisae - 3 (PranaDevil, nydushermain, shannon)
XnadrojX - 2 (karnos, Alisae)
karnos - 2 (Garmr, XnadrojX)
Garmr
and the three names on Alisae have major scumpoints to here, but there is little to zero chance that there are two scum on the Alisae wagon, as they'd likely jump onto X wagon
In post 1441, Titus wrote:karnos - 6 (Garmr, XnadrojX, BlueBloodedToffee, TheRealGin-N-Tonic, PranaDevil, ThinkBig)[/color]
All Alone - 2 (Lexa, LicketyQuickety)
ThinkBig - 2 (shannon, Alisae)
LicketyQuickety - 1 (All Alone)
XnadrojX - 1 (karnos)
Not Voting - 2 (Pepchoninga)
This ending suggests a
mass bus after the scum failed to get a town wagon to counter.
Although, if I'm candid, I'd suspect my slot for not even trying during this wagon. The lack of a counter = ineffective scum or lurker scum.
We have ineffective scum here and I know that because I am in the slot of lurker.
So again reasoning that aren't your provenenly shit vca?
Well spotted. Was in the middle of a long game of multiplayer MTG commander, and a mate had a long turn so checked to see what was posted. You'll find I already said I was busy this weekend but would at least try and read where possible to keep up to date.
Also, claim? Nope, lynch me if you fancy. Not claiming.
Either you think I'm scum, at which point have actual reasons for it, or you don't think I'm scum, in which case vote for scum.
We already know scum is in the pairings of:
Shannon/Garmr and Myself/Lexa.
I know I'm town, so I'm fine with lynching Lexa obviously, and shannon is more likely scum than Garmr.
Titus seems to not understand there's more to the game than VCA, thus I've decided to ignore them because they offer sweet feck all to the game beyond a lot of hot air and failure to read anything to understand why votes went where they did (which, if you do VCA without that, you are already losing the game).
Titus can read the thread, or accept they will be deemed to be as useful in that slot as Pep was, for town at least, if somehow they're scum (possible, but loosely so based on my previous theory), they're doing a cracking job of stuffing things up for town.
I was asked to unvote her earlier when I put her at L-1
We are all waiting to hear about Titus' VC, and Titus has indicated she thinks Lexa might not be scum
Gin, who you are all saying is conf town, is also starting to be a bit up in the air about Lexa
Town posting or Lexa buddy.
I do have a couple concerns on Gin but they are role related.
If I were with Lexa I'd have bussed the hell out of her for town cred.
In post 1574, ThinkBig wrote:I think Lexa is a better lynch because:
1. He lied about his role (I am a firm believer in lynching all liars, that is unless a doctor or cop claims VT in order to investigate and avoid the NK);
So you're okay with lying if you think it's justified. Do you not think I was justified given my reasoning?
Given all we've discussed I think the best option is to
lynch shannon
, her claim being a functional cc to my claim makes it very unlikely we both are town
Be careful saying that, I'm going to flip town.
@Prana claim or get lynched. We don't have time for this BS.
Unless that's not accepted as a standard lynch format and I'm too used to talk voting from my home meta in which case confirming VOTE: shannon
<<< My rules are rather unambiguous there.
Voting must be bolded or in vote tags to be counted. If I recognize who it's for, it counts.
So a bolded "Vote: Playername" will count; a bolded "vote player" would count, any vote tag will count, but bold other than "vote playername", or an unbolded "VOTE: Playername" will not count. >>>
Last edited by mastina on Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In order for it to be counted. I didn't interpret it as a vote either.
(Note: Not voted because I do NOT want this to count)
<<< This is correct. Bolded "Vote: playername" will count. Unbolded "vote: playername" will not; other ways of bolding a playername will not count. I can only count a clear, unambiguous vote, and the only way for me to know it is a clear, unambiguous vote is to see the word vote, or have it be inside vote tags. >>>
Last edited by mastina on Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I have officially retired this account. My new account is Virtuoso.
In post 1645, Lexa wrote:Unless that's not accepted as a standard lynch format and I'm too used to talk voting from my home meta in which case confirming VOTE: shannon
My home site uses VTL (vote to lynch) Player name as the standard way to vote.
I have officially retired this account. My new account is Virtuoso.
I'm flexible as a mod. If it's intended, I count it.
<<< I, too, will count a vote if it is intended as one. However, I need to recognize it as clear, unambiguous intent to vote. Unbolded leaves ambiguity; not using the word "vote" leaves ambiguity. >>>
Last edited by mastina on Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.