(NSFW) Mini 1882 - TPTG Mafia 1.5: The Fappening (NoWins)

[KuroiXHF]

I'll try to fix the coding...

Kuroi is scummy

Until you actually produce something worth reading, I'm going to just ignore you.

I dislike 228 as I have huge doubts that Kuroi has never played or modded a game with SnarkySnowman.

There's an ongoing game so I can't talk about it, but I'll reference once the game is finished, which is about any day now.

He has to know what to expect. This post has all the hallmarks of LAMIST, pointless lecturing. The only think giving me reservations is that Podo is quick to buddy up to him and Podo is still in my pool of scum.

Fuck. He caught us.

Well, undecided is a better term. Are you denying your similarities between your town and scum play?

Nope. But that’s of course not the point. I find it is an easy refuge for scum these days to say “Whelp, I can’t read MoI” as a way to refuse to commit to read on me until it there is a popular opinion to follow.

You've basically described something that is NAI. "Town can't read me, but scum ALSO say they can't read me!"[/quote]

[RachMarie]

If I read the game mechanics correctly the person who starts boning if they have any hangups ends up not being able to get it on with the other person. And my hangups (if I had any), would not interfere with me getting it on.

Im determining which one of you I am gonna give some special attention to. I want to make sure its a solid town read for me.

[All In]

@MoI, out of the failed player pool, I'd pick Kuroi, but we're not a match.

My second pick would be DGB. I got nothing on SnarkySnowman and ThinkBig is just scum.

[podoboq]

The only think giving me reservations is that Podo is quick to buddy up to him and Podo is still in my pool of scum.

Don't know what to tell you man, I just really hate lurkers. As evidence, I'd like to point you to all of my games on mafiascum, including the one I just finished moderating in which three players had to be replaced due to inactivity. Players like SnarkySnowman make me not want to play mafia, and if we had the ability to lynch him, I'd probably be arguing to policy lynch him.

If you think me cheering for the guy reaming Snarky is an attempt to buddy him, you just don't know the extent to which I despise lurkers. I'm happy to see someone else say something for once.

[MagnaofIllusion]

@MoI, out of the failed player pool, I'd pick Kuroi, but we're not a match.

Reminder - Kuroi --> you isn't a match. Not out of the question given the mechanics as decribed by the Mods that you --> Kuroi is.

[RachMarie]

MoI gets it

so keep on dancing for me and then I will pick.

[KuroiXHF]

Losing this game or being the catcher, not the pitcher.

This is a tough choice.

[podoboq]

Losing this game or being the catcher, not the pitcher.

This is a tough choice.

Only pansies are afraid to bottom. Grow some balls and let Rach peg your brains out.

[All In]

@MoI, out of the failed player pool, I'd pick Kuroi, but we're not a match.

Reminder - Kuroi --> you isn't a match. Not out of the question given the mechanics as decribed by the Mods that you --> Kuroi is.

Good point. I didn't realize that.

[Gorkington]

inb4 5 people die today.

[KuroiXHF]

The last player who has no one to Get Kinky Wit-It will be lynched, and their alignment flipped.

Weren't you the guy yelling at all of us because you don't like holding our hands through the rules?

[Gorkington]

If there are multiple players, a second chance will be given. If there are still multiple players after this, they will all be lynched.

literally right beside it.
and that wasnt even me.

[KuroiXHF]

There aren't going to be five people without a bang buddy.
I'm 92% sure of it.

[Gorkington]

lol.
are you being condescending after being the most wrong person ever?

[KuroiXHF]

No.
I'm not being condescending and you haven't proven me wrong.

[Gorkington]

let me just bust out some statistics to prove your vague 92% statement about a joke i was making wrong.
or maybe youre just being really assy about something that doesnt matter at all.

[Gorkington]

like "ohohohoo" man what a big deal after you couldnt be fucked to read a single line in the rules in its entirety and tried to use that to shit on my face when it was actually dramonic you were annoyed at.

what a fucking pointless thing to make a big deal about.

[Fresh]

On that note I’d also like to discuss with AllIn, Fresh, NN and Rach what their thoughts are on the pool of non-Getting Kinky players. If there is a candidate that everyone thinks is most likely scum in that group it certainly isn’t out of the question to coordinate to match up those who can still choose with the Townier players in the stranded pool and effectively achieve a lynch via leaving one player unmatched. Personally at this stage ThinkBig or Kuroi look like good strand choices to me.

Its not up to us as much as we want it to be.

Say you want to strand ThinkBig. The moment the failed lovers get the chance to go again, he can just be the first to post a get kinky and hope it works. Its not in our power to strand.

[Fresh]

Oh and whatever argument is happening above, clearing this up now.

The last player who has no one to Get Kinky Wit-It will be lynched, and their alignment flipped.

If there are multiple players, a second chance will be given.

So there.

[Gorkington]

thanks.
you missed a spot though.

[Fresh]

It is still possible after the second chance that multiple lynches could occur. But that's highly unlikely given that probability is decent that the failed lovers have similar kinks vs not. This circles back to my point that we can't control who is stranded when once a second chance comes up that individual can just whip it out.

[Fresh]

thanks.
you missed a spot though.

I missed an entire post. Literally I did not read it.

[Gorkington]

s'all good

[Fresh]

It was necessary for me to review it anyway. I'm trying to discern at this point just going for some kink because there's such a large player pool in the failed section that its reasonable for a second chance to still occur as well as someone remaining still choosing me. The only thing I'm thinking about mechanically is the # of scum as well as how many scum may already be in the failed pool. My train of thought initially would either be for a scum player to quickly pull his/her dick out or to wait it out and be one of the last to have first choice on hooker scraps.

[MagnaofIllusion]

Say you want to strand ThinkBig. The moment the failed lovers get the chance to go again, he can just be the first to post a get kinky and hope it works. Its not in our power to strand.

Yes, but that assumes those with options left open don't coordinate their actions.

Are you against said discussion?