Fire Emblem: Heroes of Mafia [Game Over]

[Desperado]

Votecount 1-3

Dunnstral (1): Vaxkiller
GuyInFreezer (1): Boonskiies
Not Chara (1): PeregrineV
Fr099er (3): GuyInFreezer, Gammagooey, Not Chara
Gammagooey(3): ThinkBig, Desperado, Vifam
Vifam(1): Superhans
Superhans (1): Fr099er
Desperado (1): Papa Zito

With 15 players alive, it will take 8 votes to lynch/no lynch.
Not Voting (3): Dunnstral, Malachite, Brian Skies

Deadline for Day One is: (expired on 2017-02-23 18:53:43)

VOTE: Dunnstral

I was going to vote Gif, but Dunn replacing Frie Assassin?

VOTE: Dunn

Dunnestral is at L-1 I believe.

There's actually no reason to lynch Dunn right now. At least give it a few days; he's barely even done anything this game.

Side note: UGH, I WANT TO HAMMER SO BADLY!!! I LOVE BEING THE HAMMER....

[Boonskiies]

i don't believe that you really believed dunn was close to being hammered

Also fair enough. I like that reasoning. I haven't been on site for a while, but people who have played with me before can probably vouch against that. I kind of had a "not a village idiot....THE village idiot" reputation around here.

[Desperado]

i know who you are

i don't care

[Boonskiies]

i know who you are

i don't care

Cool.

[Boonskiies]

Like I said, I was fine with your reasoning for voting me.

[Papa Zito]

It's page 5...work with me man. I'm trying to start conversation and change off of our irrelevant conversation.

I'm not sure what makes our conversation "irrelevant" as I'm currently trying to worm into your head but sure. I've seen 3 scummish things so far.

1. Gamma's counterwagon comment when there was no counterwagon in existence.
2. Desperado's jump onto Gamma
3. Your complete and total overreaction to the game state.

None of this is worth much.

[Boonskiies]

Irrelevant because of the semantics of it all. I felt like we were on two different pages for our conversation, which didn't even really apply for me anymore after I noticed I was just being dumb.

[Vifam]

It's page 5...work with me man. I'm trying to start conversation and change off of our irrelevant conversation.

I'm not sure what makes our conversation "irrelevant" as I'm currently trying to worm into your head but sure. I've seen 3 scummish things so far.

1. Gamma's counterwagon comment when there was no counterwagon in existence.
2. Desperado's jump onto Gamma
3. Your complete and total overreaction to the game state.

None of this is worth much.

When did #2 happen

[Papa Zito]

Post 45.

Boonskiies are you gonna do something with this info I typically don't share or what.

[Vifam]

Ok, yeah I'd agree those are the only standout things in the game atm

[Vifam]

I wouldn't really call any of it scummy tho, maybe Gamma's counterwagon thing but other then that

[Papa Zito]

I wouldn't really call any of it scummy tho, maybe Gamma's counterwagon thing but other then that

Sure, which is why I'm ????? to this line of questioning but I'm playing along to see where it goes.

[Gammagooey]

i was more trying to make a counterwagon for dumb reasons than saying a counterwagon existed before i voted

notRC's first post felt pretty arrogant (though part of that is probably my previous experiences with RC) and I saw a silly reason to vote him for it with GiF voting him a bit before I did

[Papa Zito]

Arrite I misread, strike that one from the list.

PROGRESS

[Fro99er]

@Super - why are you so play putting him to L-1 page 4? This wagon has scum on it, even if Dunn ends up being scum.

VOTE: Super

Do you still agree with your vote now that you realized super didn't actually put him at L-1 on page 4?

You called my reason for voting super suspicious, and now you're voting super with me, but for a reason that isn't even real. Wouldn't be a big deal if you had just thought about your vote after realizing your fuckup, but you haven't even decided to rethink your vote. Like you don't care where it is.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Boonskies

[Boonskiies]

VOTE: Superhans

I only worry about not knowing flavor if I roll scum.

Slightly suspish and makes me want to shout all sorts of WIFOM.

I wasn't suspicious of you voting Super, I was suspish of the statement you made. I should have been more clear with that. My vote on Super is where I want it to be still. I find him the scummiest from where we are at this point in the game. It's the wagon I'm most comfortable putting pressure on right now.


@Papa - I'm going to make a bigger post and go over my thoughts in regards to your insight.

[Vaxkiller]

I think getting the first post has worn off.



VOTE: Gamma

[Boonskiies]

@Fro9 - The statement is completely moot because it's you trying to be funny by "claiming town" indirectly, which in itself isn't scummy, as both alignments tend to try and be funny like that, but it was just something I wanted to look back on, possibly post game.

[Fro99er]

@Fro9 - The statement is completely moot because it's you trying to be funny by "claiming town" indirectly, which in itself isn't scummy, as both alignments tend to try and be funny like that, but it was just something I wanted to look back on, possibly post game.

No, I wasn't trying to be funny. I didn't like superhans saying he doesn't know the flavor and the :/ face with it.

I feel like scum tend to worry about that. Had nothing to do with WIFOM about myself and everything to do with me pointing out a reason for voting superhans.

You didn't even address my point about your vote.

[Boonskiies]

Also, I gave my reasoning, and the reasoning still stands. That wagon has/had scum on it. So if anything it just narrowed it down for me. So the fact you say I didn't even "rethink my vote" is just bad. It's you not fully reading the posts, as I stand by reasoning.

[Boonskiies]

@Fro9 - The statement is completely moot because it's you trying to be funny by "claiming town" indirectly, which in itself isn't scummy, as both alignments tend to try and be funny like that, but it was just something I wanted to look back on, possibly post game.

No, I wasn't trying to be funny. I didn't like superhans saying he doesn't know the flavor and the :/ face with it.

I feel like scum tend to worry about that. Had nothing to do with WIFOM about myself and everything to do with me pointing out a reason for voting superhans.

You didn't even address my point about your vote.

Beat me by like two seconds. SNIPED.

[Cabd]

Votecount 1-5

Dunnstral (3): Brian Skies, Superhans, PeregrineV
Fr099er (2): Gammagooey, Not Chara
Gammagooey(3): ThinkBig, Vifam, Vaxkiller
Superhans (1): Boonskiies
Desperado (1): Papa Zito
Papa Zito (1): Dunnstral
ThinkBig (1): GuyInFreezer
Boonskiies (2): Desperado, Fr099er

With 15 players alive, it will take 8 votes to lynch/no lynch.
Not Voting (1): Malachite

Deadline for Day One is: (expired on 2017-02-23 18:53:43)

[Fro99er]

You know why scum worry about not knowing flavor. Because they need to figure out a good fake claim, or if they are provided a fake claim, then if it really is a good one.

That's why I worried about it in original Steven Universe, as scum. Because I didn't know if my fake claim provided to me was any good. Turns out it wasn't.

[Boonskiies]

@Papa - I'm going to make a bigger post and go over my thoughts in regards to your insight.

This should happen by the end of the day.

[Fro99er]

So the fact you say I didn't even "rethink my vote" is just bad. It's you not fully reading the posts, as I stand by reasoning.

Bad or scummy?

What do you think of me so far.