Fire Emblem: Heroes of Mafia [Game Over]
-
-
Cabd QT Sniper
- QT Sniper
- QT Sniper
- Posts: 15682
- Joined: February 3, 2013
-
-
Vifam Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7392
- Joined: May 30, 2011
I don't see how it's useful to town tbhIn post 899, Papa Zito wrote:
so you see the only-lynchable roleblocker as a town role thenIn post 893, Vifam wrote:Yeah there's no reason to lynch TB today tbhok-
-
Vifam Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7392
- Joined: May 30, 2011
-
-
Papa Zito Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9792
- Joined: April 5, 2009
- Location: Tejas
And yet simultaneously there's no reason to lynch it today.In post 901, Vifam wrote:
I don't see how it's useful to town tbhIn post 899, Papa Zito wrote:
so you see the only-lynchable roleblocker as a town role thenIn post 893, Vifam wrote:Yeah there's no reason to lynch TB today tbhKappaJust MonikaAge is a very high price to pay for maturity.-
-
Desperado Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12582
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Location: Raleigh, NC
This doesn't make sense. If you think he's scum there is no reason to leave him alive and plenty of reasons to kill him, mainly that he probably isn't lying about being a 5 starIn post 896, Vifam wrote:
He might be yeah but different battles for different days you knowIn post 894, Desperado wrote:you mean other than him being scum or...?-
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
That makes it more likely town, because town try to be honest when they should have just left that part out.In post 884, Aj The Epic wrote:There's also no counterclaim to his assertion as a 5-star role, which we know town has 1 of. I'm fairly certain there's a possibility of more but the roll percentage of a 5 star is low enough to expect no more than 1. AKA his claim is basically true unless counterclaimed.
Though I probably wouldn't have claimed the "can be killed by strongman" part.....I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.-
-
Vifam Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7392
- Joined: May 30, 2011
-
-
Superhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: December 6, 2016
Vig idea? Wait for vig to shoot him tonight?In post 904, Desperado wrote:
This doesn't make sense. If you think he's scum there is no reason to leave him alive and plenty of reasons to kill him, mainly that he probably isn't lying about being a 5 starIn post 896, Vifam wrote:
He might be yeah but different battles for different days you knowIn post 894, Desperado wrote:you mean other than him being scum or...?-
-
Vifam Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7392
- Joined: May 30, 2011
-
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
-
-
Superhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: December 6, 2016
I like this very very much.In post 871, Brian Skies wrote:
I've only seen two mentions of Aj's slot in Chara's posting. The first was here where she said she thought our votes on the Malachite slot was weird. The second time was here where she indicated that she could see AJ as scum whiteknighting her.In post 868, PeregrineV wrote:In post 865, Brian Skies wrote:
My townread on Chara is not strong. I just think that if there's scum between the two, that it's possible that it's only AJ (or that AJ is not her partner). This is because AJ has spent most of his energy pushing suspicion on players voting his slot or chainsawing Chara.In post 860, PeregrineV wrote:
Why's that? Like, what is the source of your townread on NotChara being stronger than your read on AJ?In post 842, Brian Skies wrote:I would lynch AJ before I would lynch Chara.
Maybe. But Aj's reason for townreading Chara, as dumb as it was, makes sense.In post 866, Brian Skies wrote:
Because Chara's post is not a strong defense of the Malachite slot, and I don't believe it was ever intended to be. AJ, on the other hand, is clearly hard defending Chara.In post 863, PeregrineV wrote:In post 851, Brian Skies wrote:The reason I would vote AJ before Chara is because I can see AJ being scum whiteknighting Chara regardless of her alignment.
why does that same logic not apply to NotChara?
257 came before 415I have not seen the reverse.
AJ, on the other hand, has mentioned a strong townread or defended her on multiple occasions: 415, 427, 562, 584, 596, 601, 639, 641, 647, 849. 645 and 649 were deflections directly related to his townread on Chara. 708 was an attack on a player that voted Chara. 715 was a direct response to a question you posed to him about Chara. This means that 14/18 of his posts mentioned Chara or were related to his read on Chara in some way. None of his other posts indicate an interest in anything unrelated to her.
What about AJ's townread of Chara makes sense to you? Why do (did) you think there's a likely team between the two? And why does the bolded matter considering Chara has never stated a townread on AJ?
VOTE: AJ-
-
Superhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: December 6, 2016
you think Brian and Chara could be a scum team? Anything aside from his preference to lynch AJ that would suggest that this is the case?In post 861, Fro99er wrote:
of course you wouldIn post 842, Brian Skies wrote:I would lynch AJ before I would lynch Chara.-
-
Superhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: December 6, 2016
THINKBIGIn post 843, Superhans wrote:ThinkBig tell me what colour your orbs were.
can you answer this for me please.
if you have forgotten check your inbox.-
-
Superhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: December 6, 2016
THINKBIGIn post 843, Superhans wrote:ThinkBig tell me what colour your orbs were.
can you answer this for me please.
if you have forgotten check your inbox.-
-
Superhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: December 6, 2016
-
-
ThinkBig Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5530
- Joined: September 11, 2016
Unfortunately I deleted the message by accident.In post 912, Superhans wrote:
THINKBIGIn post 843, Superhans wrote:ThinkBig tell me what colour your orbs were.
can you answer this for me please.
if you have forgotten check your inbox.I have officially retired this account. My new account is Virtuoso.-
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Lots of people who play mafia tend to townread people who "protect" them (see this site, for example). In 257, Chara, calls out the votes on the AJ slot. As one of the top items of interest when she replaced in. I can see AJtown seeing this as defending him, and thus make Chara a town read. I can see AJscum calling his scumbuddy or townChara a townread for doing it.In post 871, Brian Skies wrote:I've only seen two mentions of Aj's slot in Chara's posting. The first was here where she said she thought our votes on the Malachite slot was weird. The second time was here where she indicated that she could see AJ as scum whiteknighting her.
AJ, on the other hand, has mentioned a strong townread or defended her on multiple occasions: 415, 427, 562, 584, 596, 601, 639, 641, 647, 849. 645 and 649 were deflections directly related to his townread on Chara. 708 was an attack on a player that voted Chara. 715 was a direct response to a question you posed to him about Chara. This means that 14/18 of his posts mentioned Chara or were related to his read on Chara in some way. None of his other posts indicate an interest in anything unrelated to her.
What about AJ's townread of Chara makes sense to you? Why do (did) you think there's a likely team between the two? And why does the bolded matter considering Chara has never stated a townread on AJ?
What is hard for me to see is why townChara makes many of the posts she did (682).
Why do I think they are a likely team? Because of Chara calling out the votes on AJ/Malachite. Why bother, unless she had a read on the slot?
And AJ does townread the slot for that. Which I think AJtown knows better.
And Chara suddenly says AJ could be scum(659), but is still voting ThinkBig (273).
And 841, where somehow their reads are matching up.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.-
-
Aj The Epic Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4567
- Joined: November 10, 2012
-
-
Vifam Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7392
- Joined: May 30, 2011
-
-
Vaxkiller Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: July 29, 2015
@super, why do you need to know thinkbigs orb selection so bad?-
-
Vifam Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7392
- Joined: May 30, 2011
-
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
It's only your 8th year of mafia, so I should explain this?In post 872, Gammagooey wrote:
aside from the no followup answers since i feel that's pretty self-explanatoryIn post 852, PeregrineV wrote:15 "questions" to people, but no follow up on any answers, if they were answered.
6 votes on six different players
Calling posts and pages bad, while defending other posts that are called bad.
More of the same.
why do you think the other things are more likely to come from scum than town?
Shopping your vote around until you find traction is often done by scum in order to secure a mislynch.
Discouraging town from posting or voting by calling their posts bad will reduce their participation in the game and reduce scumhunting.
But, you can go through his iso and say why the whole thing is more likely to come form town.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.-
-
Vifam Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7392
- Joined: May 30, 2011
I don't see scum saying this eitherIn post 836, Superhans wrote:i wouldnt mind it. would prefer it if you started playing the game more. you are in a position to (if you're not fake claiming) act as an innocent child.ok-
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
It feels like you don't really care about who or why you vote.In post 873, Papa Zito wrote:
I'm not sure how that's relevant to anything.In post 857, PeregrineV wrote:
Are you sure? Your vote for me came after I voted her.In post 803, Papa Zito wrote:I'm not gonna cry over a Not Chara corpse.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.-
-
Aj The Epic Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4567
- Joined: November 10, 2012
That's more a personality show than a scum/town thing.In post 922, Vifam wrote:
I don't see scum saying this eitherIn post 836, Superhans wrote:i wouldnt mind it. would prefer it if you started playing the game more. you are in a position to (if you're not fake claiming) act as an innocent child.
Because what I see with Hans' votes thus far is he's willing to shop for any wagon that might go through and use other people's reasons to do so. His vote on me is based off Brian Skies' reasoning, which is basically 'Aj is hard defending Chara'. This is nearly as obvious as "cabd is stealing away page tops" but Hans' states he enjoys the reason and votes. It's not a fucking hard point to get and if he didn't think of it before then, he's not being this 'hyper vigilant townie'. Post 618, he thanks Desperado for his case on NC and votes there. In between that with no explanation he sheeps Zito onto PV. No prior suspicion. More importantly, after sheeping PZ, PZ states preflip associations are bad. What does he do? Tries to press me to give him some, even when I echo PZ's sentiment. I see this as him trying to draw an issue between me and PZ since I explicitly had to tell him off three times.
This isn't townplay, Vifam. I don't care what he says, his actions are far worse.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.