Yeah. I guess I'm holding on out for you guys to learn I'm town before I'll break monogamy.In post 649, Gorkington wrote:lol. you realize that with things going as they are now, youre going to have to die in order for town to win if snarky is scum, right?
On a side-note unrelated to whatever your alignment is – you’ve been on site over a year. If you don’t understand how to proactively be Town as a Town player then no amount of hand-holding is going to help you.In post 652, KuroiXHF wrote:Jeez, a guy can't just ask from advice on how to look town, can they?
Of course. But there would have to be some downside to scum being able to be assured they aren’t stranded. I mean I tend to agree that Rach probably isn't scum but it isn't completely out of the question solely on set-up spec.In post 639, Gorkington wrote:@moi, does scum do that when they know that itll make them look awful as fuck though?
My Town wincondition says nothing about having to be alive to win. Someone clearly didn’t get a Town role Pm …In post 648, KuroiXHF wrote:Because I want to win, and I got to survive for that.
Basically a scum claim right here.In post 646, KuroiXHF wrote:Well I do have reads. For example, I don't think Snarky is town. I don't think MoI is town. I think Podoq is town.
Would a readslist help?
This is not Town explaining that someone is scum to them. Town doesn’t say the above about a player they actually think is scum.In post 606, KuroiXHF wrote:My explanation is simply I don't want to play things MoI's way, because he's not looking to meet me half way. I mean, you can scum read me and if it's my time to go, fine. But I'm going to play to win and have fun, not just constantly butt heads with someone so inflexible.
Yes you can! You seriously, seriously can.In post 654, KuroiXHF wrote:Well y'know, you can't help your team win if you're not alive.
And you've been here longer than me. Why don't you know this?
Unless Gork or I deny the people requesting us, you and All-In are dead.In post 658, RachMarie wrote:I was waiting to hear from All in, in our PT but have not heard from him, who is left?
This one is thinking backwards. Rach would have to have no hang ups to pair with anyone and lots of kinks for all the failures. Read the rules.In post 636, MagnaofIllusion wrote:If Rach indeed has no Kinks then her as scum means that she can always link up with a partner to prevent them from being Cucked. Is it out of the question that it could be a scum role? No. You can make an argument the way she handled it seems Pro-Scum (looking to strand as many Town players without warning). If she were in a position where she was scum read then she could only assure her survival by repeatedly linking with partners.In post 634, Gorkington wrote:gahhh
im getting scared that im trusting too much that the mods wouldnt make rach's prefs scum.
Its making the best of a terrible situation. Neither all-in nor rach is particularly town.In post 659, podoboq wrote:Unless Gork or I deny the people requesting us, you and All-In are dead.In post 658, RachMarie wrote:I was waiting to hear from All in, in our PT but have not heard from him, who is left?
A man really wishes you hadn't revealed all that. He wasn't going to let you be stuck out...In post 664, RachMarie wrote:uggh seriously guys I am town meh I just have been swamped work wise which is why I went on VLA for a few days.
I do have a lot of kinks and no hangups and I have been clear on that.
Exhibitionism Which I hinted at rather frequently
S&M That was the main one I was doing as a Domme
Rubberists I hinted at this one as well
Furries I had held this one back to hopefully confuse the scum.
GL townies and hopefully I was wrong about my lover dude and he is scum otherwise meh you all have your work cut out for you.
Thanks for the game oh might trouser modly god
Slides off her rubber faux leather boots, her mini skirt, and her lace corset. with a flick of her hair she reveals the cat ears that were on top of her head, and with a crack of her whip, she dances her naked body off the stage. The handcuffs drag All in with her to the backstage area awaiting the final verdict.
At least now a man can properly name this the role fish that it is. Scum.In post 636, MagnaofIllusion wrote:If Rach indeed has no Kinks then her as scum means that she can always link up with a partner to prevent them from being Cucked. Is it out of the question that it could be a scum role? No. You can make an argument the way she handled it seems Pro-Scum (looking to strand as many Town players without warning). If she were in a position where she was scum read then she could only assure her survival by repeatedly linking with partners.In post 634, Gorkington wrote:gahhh
im getting scared that im trusting too much that the mods wouldnt make rach's prefs scum.
And how, per chance, did you plan on doing that?In post 665, Jaqen Hghar wrote:He wasn't going to let you be stuck out...
Ignoring your posts is a serious possibility. Misreading or misinterpreting them is another.In post 666, Jaqen Hghar wrote:Exactly what did you think a man was getting at with his question to you or did you even see it? Feck!
In what way is this rolefishing at all? You can join the scum pile with Kuroi.In post 667, Jaqen Hghar wrote:At least now a man can properly name this the role fish that it is. Scum.In post 636, MagnaofIllusion wrote:If Rach indeed has no Kinks then her as scum means that she can always link up with a partner to prevent them from being Cucked. Is it out of the question that it could be a scum role? No. You can make an argument the way she handled it seems Pro-Scum (looking to strand as many Town players without warning). If she were in a position where she was scum read then she could only assure her survival by repeatedly linking with partners.In post 634, Gorkington wrote:gahhh
im getting scared that im trusting too much that the mods wouldnt make rach's prefs scum.
Fair enough.In post 663, dramonic wrote:Its making the best of a terrible situation. Neither all-in nor rach is particularly town.In post 659, podoboq wrote:Unless Gork or I deny the people requesting us, you and All-In are dead.In post 658, RachMarie wrote:I was waiting to hear from All in, in our PT but have not heard from him, who is left?
If I thought they were worth saving id have asked them to pair not you.
Some things are best left unsaid...for now.In post 668, podoboq wrote:And how, per chance, did you plan on doing that?In post 665, Jaqen Hghar wrote:He wasn't going to let you be stuck out...
That one is playing with a man many and more times and is never having an issue with understanding.In post 669, podoboq wrote:Ignoring your posts is a serious possibility. Misreading or misinterpreting them is another.In post 666, Jaqen Hghar wrote:Exactly what did you think a man was getting at with his question to you or did you even see it? Feck!
Purposefully (I'm saying that because it's clear by the rules how hooking up works and MoI has referenced the rules plenty to know) mistaking that one's role compels one to set the record straight. A man is hoping that simply pointing out the flaw in what MoI is saying is enough to halt that reply, but no.In post 670, podoboq wrote:In what way is this rolefishing at all? You can join the scum pile with Kuroi.In post 667, Jaqen Hghar wrote:At least now a man can properly name this the role fish that it is. Scum.In post 636, MagnaofIllusion wrote:If Rach indeed has no Kinks then her as scum means that she can always link up with a partner to prevent them from being Cucked. Is it out of the question that it could be a scum role? No. You can make an argument the way she handled it seems Pro-Scum (looking to strand as many Town players without warning). If she were in a position where she was scum read then she could only assure her survival by repeatedly linking with partners.In post 634, Gorkington wrote:gahhh
im getting scared that im trusting too much that the mods wouldnt make rach's prefs scum.
