he wasn't openly defending you thoIn post 1343, Not Chara wrote:that Brian would openly defend me when two other players were doing that work for me?
In post 721, Brian Skies wrote:In post 654, Not Chara wrote:emphasis on how much i cannot make myself scumread hans, perhaps? i don't know, how i typed it is how i felt it.This is what I thought you meant. I don't like the word 'make', because it sounds like you were trying to force yourself to read him a certain way, and I don't know why you would feel the need to do that. You deliberately drawing attention to it just makes it worse for me.In post 658, Not Chara wrote:that i couldnt muster a scumread on hans. feels gut town.In post 656, Vaxkiller wrote:How did you feel?
I don't know what from your posts gives Desp the impression that it's a scum stream of consciousness. When I read through your early posts, it didn't bother me that much. And your later posts, particularly the ones in response to the pressure on you, give me the impression of a townie speaking in my head (regardless of whether I agree with anything you've said).
This bothered me as well. But I figured you probably hit the Q+ button a few times. You immediately responding to it makes me believe it wasn't intentional, and I agree that Desperado's post was probably the worst of the bunch, but only because I didn't like his explanation for it here. Thinkbig's post just looks like a kneejerk response that could easily be from either alignment and Super's post just looks like an obvious joke not to be taken seriously.In post 259, Not Chara wrote:In post 47, Desperado wrote:chillin
wondering why you went straight to "lol you think we're partners????" when surely you knew it was multiball
kinda weirdIn post 87, ThinkBig wrote:Well that was a quick change in vote from dunnestral. Yuck.oh, right. i didn't like anything ThinkBig posted, that's what i was forgetting.
VOTE: ThinkBig
In post 842, Brian Skies wrote:I would lynch AJ before I would lynch Chara.
In post 851, Brian Skies wrote:The reason I would vote AJ before Chara is because I can see AJ being scum whiteknighting Chara regardless of her alignment.
In post 865, Brian Skies wrote:My townread on Chara is not strong. I just think that if there's scum between the two, that it's possible that it's only AJ (or that AJ is not her partner). This is because AJ has spent most of his energy pushing suspicion on players voting his slot or chainsawing Chara.In post 860, PeregrineV wrote:Why's that? Like, what is the source of your townread on NotChara being stronger than your read on AJ?In post 842, Brian Skies wrote:I would lynch AJ before I would lynch Chara.
In post 866, Brian Skies wrote:Because Chara's post is not a strong defense of the Malachite slot, and I don't believe it was ever intended to be. AJ, on the other hand, is clearly hard defending Chara.In post 863, PeregrineV wrote:In post 851, Brian Skies wrote:The reason I would vote AJ before Chara is because I can see AJ being scum whiteknighting Chara regardless of her alignment.
why does that same logic not apply to NotChara?
257 came before 415
In post 871, Brian Skies wrote:I've only seen two mentions of Aj's slot in Chara's posting. The first was here where she said she thought our votes on the Malachite slot was weird. The second time was here where she indicated that she could see AJ as scum whiteknighting her.In post 868, PeregrineV wrote:In post 865, Brian Skies wrote:My townread on Chara is not strong. I just think that if there's scum between the two, that it's possible that it's only AJ (or that AJ is not her partner). This is because AJ has spent most of his energy pushing suspicion on players voting his slot or chainsawing Chara.In post 860, PeregrineV wrote:Why's that? Like, what is the source of your townread on NotChara being stronger than your read on AJ?In post 842, Brian Skies wrote:I would lynch AJ before I would lynch Chara.Maybe. But Aj's reason for townreading Chara, as dumb as it was, makes sense.In post 866, Brian Skies wrote:Because Chara's post is not a strong defense of the Malachite slot, and I don't believe it was ever intended to be. AJ, on the other hand, is clearly hard defending Chara.In post 863, PeregrineV wrote:In post 851, Brian Skies wrote:The reason I would vote AJ before Chara is because I can see AJ being scum whiteknighting Chara regardless of her alignment.
why does that same logic not apply to NotChara?
257 came before 415I have not seen the reverse.
AJ, on the other hand, has mentioned a strong townread or defended her on multiple occasions: 415, 427, 562, 584, 596, 601, 639, 641, 647, 849. 645 and 649 were deflections directly related to his townread on Chara. 708 was an attack on a player that voted Chara. 715 was a direct response to a question you posed to him about Chara. This means that 14/18 of his posts mentioned Chara or were related to his read on Chara in some way. None of his other posts indicate an interest in anything unrelated to her.
What about AJ's townread of Chara makes sense to you? Why do (did) you think there's a likely team between the two? And why does the bolded matter considering Chara has never stated a townread on AJ?
In post 1104, Brian Skies wrote:Aj has also continued his pattern of attacking players who scumread him or scumread Chara. He has since added in mild setup speculation.
In post 1112, Brian Skies wrote:Well, I wouldn't be so focused on you if you learned a new trick. But since you apparently only know how to do three things, then yeah, you're scum.In post 1109, Aj The Epic wrote:Look at you all setting up lynches. It's so adorable. I wouldn't have to focus on defending Chara so much if you wouldn't insist they're scum. And saying "Aj is only focusing on those who vote Chara" is kinda disingenuous because that's at least half the fucking game at some point or another, considering people like Brian Skiies only states "Vote AJ" anymore.
The game is 40+ pages now. Surely you can do more than just attack people for their reads on you or Chara. I remember you entering the game with a comment about forced run-ups, but you never bothered to follow up on it. Did you even do it?