Gay Mafia 3: Trumpocalypse Now D8

Desperado · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:26 am

i don't think i've ever seen majiffy flail before

Majiffy · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:26 am

In post 672, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote: Yeah uhhh

what stops the scum from just shooting the enablers each night then if they're all town?

Even IF 5/24 confirmed town that's not a lot...

... They should

They're clear

Donald has 1 power left that's of any use, and it doesn't require him to survive the night to go through

The enablers exist as named townies at this point.

Little Red Fedora · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:26 am

In post 671, Tammy wrote:
In post 662, Little Red Fedora wrote:
In post 649, Tammy wrote:
In post 643, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Tammy why were you worried about who targeted you last night?

Is your vote also locked?
You know what I hate this game so I'm happy to die.

Nacho said hey tammy come join this game with me it will be fun and then you fuckers quicklynched town before I even had the chance to read the game. No wonder I fucking hate mafia lately.

I tried to investigate Brian last night. Whatever you or whoever you did gave me no result, so thank you for that.
Tammy, talk to me. I am annoyed I got shut out too but bitching helps no one. I am starting to think a birdy is right when I cannot talk to you. You're missing things even I saw and I ain't good at subtle. It could be speed of thread.
I'm on my phone right now as I said, I'm sure I'm missing a bunch. That's why I said I could talk when I got to a computer.

You won't be lynched until you reach a PC. There's no town reason to do that.

How long are we looking at?

Majiffy · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:27 am

In post 674, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 668, Majiffy wrote:This greatly decreases our chances of mislynching.
What??

How is 5 "confirmed" townies where 1 might be scum isn't literally the same exact odds as lynching without anyone claiming?

How is operating with 5 clears better than not operating with 5 clears?

What?

Brian Skies · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:27 am

In post 658, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 653, Tammy wrote:So now you can explain why the fuck you role blocked me if that's what you did.
Tammy idk what my role does!!!

I believe this only because Reck won't explain to me how my role is supposed to work.

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:27 am

In post 678, Majiffy wrote:
In post 674, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 668, Majiffy wrote:This greatly decreases our chances of mislynching.
What??

How is 5 "confirmed" townies where 1 might be scum isn't literally the same exact odds as lynching without anyone claiming?
How is operating with 5 clears better than not operating with 5 clears?

What?

...Because they're not 5 clears................

Desperado · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:28 am

they aren't clears and 1/5 is 25% which is the general rule of thumb for scum

so 1/5 is the same as 5/25

so there's literally nothing to gain unless we knew for a fact that all enablers are town

except we don't

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:28 am

In post 679, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 658, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 653, Tammy wrote:So now you can explain why the fuck you role blocked me if that's what you did.
Tammy idk what my role does!!!
I believe this only because Reck won't explain to me how my role is supposed to work.

Idk I just sent a PM to see what my role to UT Reck let's see if one answers.

I should've prob did it before I targeted someone but oh well...

bundle of sticks · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:28 am

In post 518, Little Red Fedora wrote:What is this trash?

You're townreading Wraith?

Majiffy · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:29 am

In post 680, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote: ...Because they're not 5 clears................

The majority are almost certainly town

If we operate

as if they are clear

scum will have to start killing the town ones off

How do you not understand this very simple concept?

Little Red Fedora · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:29 am

In post 683, bundle of sticks wrote:
In post 518, Little Red Fedora wrote:What is this trash?
You're townreading Wraith?

I just didn't like the vote until they explained it and I understood it.
-Ali

Desperado · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:29 am

no they don't!

they can just keep the 4 of you alive and let paranoia grow while they kill people who actually matter

Tammy · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:30 am

In post 658, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 653, Tammy wrote:So now you can explain why the fuck you role blocked me if that's what you did.
Tammy idk what my role does!!!

In post 660, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:But I did target you for funsies

Still want to fucking punch you.

kuribo · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:30 am

In post 673, kuribo wrote:
In post 649, Tammy wrote:I tried to investigate Brian last night. Whatever you or whoever you did gave me no result, so thank you for that.

Uhhhh are you vote manipulator or something else because what

Disregard this question, I read Wraith's post and thought you had legit claimed vote manipulator

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:30 am

In post 684, Majiffy wrote:
In post 680, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote: ...Because they're not 5 clears................
The majority are almost certainly town

If we operate
as if they are clear
scum will have to start killing the town ones off

How do you not understand this very simple concept?

The majority in any given game are certainly town... it's the concept of mafia.

Let's operate as if everyone is clear guys good work.

Brian Skies · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:31 am

In post 667, Tammy wrote:Wraith - I targeted Brian last night because I though he had a chance for being scum but is someone I can't read all that well though I think he has really good instincts when town and if town, and known to me, we could work together. I almost targeted Titus because I was suspicious of the slot, can't really read her that well unless certain things arise, and I'd be able to work with her knowing if she were town or get her lynched much easier than I can if she's scum.

^Yeah, this is town. Not that Tammy outright claiming an investigative role wasn't already a huge enough clue to the rest of you.

kuribo · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:31 am

In post 686, Desperado wrote:no they don't!

they can just keep the 4 of you alive and let paranoia grow while they kill people who actually matter

Pretty much this

Plus if the enablers out then it just gives scum a roadmap by process of elimination to find people with useful roles

bundle of sticks · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:31 am

In post 529, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 527, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:OH

TAMMY are you scum?
She is, I guess it's a rhetorical question?

??

In post 533, Albert B. Rampage wrote:VOTE: Bellsprout

iguess.jpg

In post 544, Little Red Fedora wrote:
In post 480, Sir Elton Hercules John wrote:
VC 2.1Little Red Fedora - 1 (Brian Skies)

In post 482, Little Red Fedora wrote:VOTE: Brian
This, Vax, Sticks, and Desperado I'm okay with getting rid of.
-Ali
We should not vote Brian today. Unless the mod is somehow psychic into your head, I cannot approve of someone randomly placing our vote.

Based on wagon dynamics, I suspect FF was largely town pushed and want to look off the wagon.

~Titus

To both parts of this post I say simply: what?

Majiffy · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:32 am

In post 681, Desperado wrote:they aren't clears and 1/5 is 25% which is the general rule of thumb for scum

so 1/5 is the same as 5/25

so there's literally nothing to gain unless we knew for a fact that all enablers are town

except we don't

We're not lynching in the fucking enablers right now

Holy fuck

There's 22 alive

Lets say that's 5/22, 22.7% blind shot

We lower that number to 17 for a lynch pool and take 1 scum out, worse case scenario

4/17 23.5%

Best case

5/17 29.4%

And those are just

blind shots

Brian Skies · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:32 am

In post 683, bundle of sticks wrote:
In post 518, Little Red Fedora wrote:What is this trash?
You're townreading Wraith?

^See? Sticks is town.

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:32 am

In post 687, Tammy wrote:
In post 658, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 653, Tammy wrote:So now you can explain why the fuck you role blocked me if that's what you did.
Tammy idk what my role does!!!

In post 660, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:But I did target you for funsies
Still want to fucking punch you.

Tbh there's a p big chance I didn't roleblock you but I do have a ~somewhat~ obscure role (that I thought I understood at first? but seeing Firebringer's role clear as daylight as PGO I'm having doubts that my role isn't clear cut).

I thought all roles were a bit obscure so I didn't bother questioning my assumption as to what my role was.

Brian Skies · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:33 am

Well, I guess a scum Ceph could still make that post. But I want to believe I'm right.

bundle of sticks · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:33 am

In post 554, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 542, Majiffy wrote:
In post 537, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 536, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:ABR needs to go blood for the blood god
She had a really bad post history, right up there with Tammy.
What was up with your D1 posting?
Spreading the word of the God Emperor because I'm a loyal legal

Seeing this reply reminds me of what the point of 542 was supposed to be.

VOTE: Majiffy.

Majiffy · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:33 am

In post 686, Desperado wrote:no they don't!

they can just keep the 4 of you alive and let paranoia grow while they kill people who actually matter

Keep 4 confirmed town alive just to save 1 scum?

That sounds like a really awful idea.

Majiffy · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:33 am

You know what cool fine lynch me

VOTE: Majiffy

This fucking town is off their goddamn rockers