mini-normal 1892 - GAME END - Bodies, all over the floor

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:56 pm

VOTE: LicketyQuickety

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:05 pm

In post 22, Superhans wrote:Gut feels I'm not gonna get town read from LicketyQuickety any time soon :/

In post 24, Superhans wrote:What tone did you set, oh glorious town leader?

These two posts are a conflict of character; one is defeatist, one is a snarky comeback.

Lets break this down.

Your first posts I quoted is bad and I'll tell you why:

Post #1

You are making a huge assumption on how I am going to read you in the future of the game. This is Sus, because it is an assumption that has literally no basis to it.
The ":/" is indicative that you are not happy with this. I don't think Town should have the mentality that they should feel uneasy about someone Scum reading them because Town is by default, not afraid.
Its also an admission of guilt that you feel you were caught already and now you have to live with being caught.

Post #2

It should be apparent that I set a ton that wasn't necessarily "ordinary" filled with regular pleasantries and the like. The ton I set should indicate that I will be saying and doing whatever I feel like without the necessities of being courteous.
This post also looks a lot like a bluff to show that you are not afraid of falling under suspicion. Its too over the top in a way that doesn't look natural.
It also indicates that you do understand a similar kind of ton that I set by you yourself exuding the same kind of nature of tone.

Why are these posts a conflict of character?

The emotions that are produced through tone are almost complete different and is unnatural to have such a change of feelings in such a short time.. One is about feeling disappointed that something didn't go your way while the other completely contrasts that and says you have nothing to be dismayed about.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:31 pm

In post 25, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:VOTE: LicketyQuickety

We are out of RVS, this vote isn't going to work.

nancy · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:08 pm

In post 14, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 13, nancy wrote:VOTE: LQ

You know why.
My role is ALMOST as good as last game. Is that why you are voting me?

Yeah I rolecopped you N0

nancy · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:10 pm

LQ meh. Cutting RVS short is just killing this game.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:20 pm

In post 29, nancy wrote:LQ meh. Cutting RVS short is just killing this game.

What do you think of the actual case is the important thing here.

Fart · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:40 pm

VOTE: nancy

this draconian rule set makes me wanna nope outa this game but I'm too fucking lazy to send a pm

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:41 pm

In post 31, Fart wrote:VOTE: nancy

this draconian rule set makes me wanna nope outa this game but I'm too fucking lazy to send a pm

Hi, RC, how's it going?

Fart · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:45 pm

lol

I like your try-hard RVS Hans case.

VOTE: Hans

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 12:05 am

In post 33, Fart wrote:lol

I like your try-hard RVS Hans case.

VOTE: Hans

You can be Town.

momo · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 12:38 am

Hello

VOTE: Lil Uzi Vert

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 1:03 am

Juicy,

this game is turning out fantastic so far.

momo · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 1:38 am

In post 20, Superhans wrote:VOTE: Mono

WTF is this. My name is momo.

Superhans · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:01 am

In post 37, momo wrote:
In post 20, Superhans wrote:VOTE: Mono
WTF is this. My name is momo.

Sorry.

bjc0303 · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:54 am

VOTE: LicketyQuickett

Trying way too hard to appear to break things down when it's just about impossible to by post #5

momo · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:58 am

This ^ is true.

But that is just how LQ plays as town.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:21 am

In post 39, bjc0303 wrote:VOTE: LicketyQuickett

Trying way too hard to appear to break things down when it's just about impossible to by post #5

Just about impossible doesn't mean impossible.

I got us out of RVS, just like it was supposed to do and you are voting me for that? LOL, you Scum?

nancy · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:43 am

In post 30, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 29, nancy wrote:LQ meh. Cutting RVS short is just killing this game.
What do you think of the actual case is the important thing here.

It's pedantic and basically NAI. I don't like that you cut RVS short, it stalls the game.

In post 27, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 25, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:VOTE: LicketyQuickety
We are out of RVS, this vote isn't going to work.

Why did you wait half an hour to respond? What's the thought process behind "this vote isn't going to work"?

In post 31, Fart wrote:VOTE: nancy

this draconian rule set makes me wanna nope outa this game but I'm too fucking lazy to send a pm

LOL. I didn't know you were in this game. I was kinda thinking the same thing, this might be bearable now though. We should have hydraed lol.

Sleepytimes.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:53 am

In post 42, nancy wrote:
In post 30, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 29, nancy wrote:LQ meh. Cutting RVS short is just killing this game.
What do you think of the actual case is the important thing here.
It's pedantic and basically NAI. I don't like that you cut RVS short, it stalls the game.

In post 27, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 25, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:VOTE: LicketyQuickety
We are out of RVS, this vote isn't going to work.
Why did you wait half an hour to respond? What's the thought process behind "this vote isn't going to work"?

In post 31, Fart wrote:VOTE: nancy

this draconian rule set makes me wanna nope outa this game but I'm too fucking lazy to send a pm
LOL. I didn't know you were in this game. I was kinda thinking the same thing, this might be bearable now though. We should have hydraed lol.

Sleepytimes.

So many arguments I could go with here, but I don't want to hog the thread so I'll let someone else answer.

bjc0303 · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:54 am

In post 41, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 39, bjc0303 wrote:VOTE: LicketyQuickett

Trying way too hard to appear to break things down when it's just about impossible to by post #5
Just about impossible doesn't mean impossible.

I got us out of RVS, just like it was supposed to do and you are voting me for that? LOL, you Scum?

4 sure

Fart · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:11 am

In post 39, bjc0303 wrote:VOTE: LicketyQuickett

Trying way too hard to appear to break things down when it's just about impossible to by post #5

In post 40, momo wrote:This ^ is true.

But that is just how LQ plays as town.

@LQ
@nancy

this is not an RC alt so sorry to disappoint

Fart · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:13 am

those quotes don't go there but I was gonna say Mono is unnecessarily defending LQ here

Fart · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:14 am

(dear god don't let me alt slip)

Fart · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:14 am

but really this isn't RC I promise

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:19 am

In post 45, Fart wrote:
In post 39, bjc0303 wrote:VOTE: LicketyQuickett

Trying way too hard to appear to break things down when it's just about impossible to by post #5

In post 40, momo wrote:This ^ is true.

But that is just how LQ plays as town.
@LQ
@nancy

this is not an RC alt so sorry to disappoint

I could tell you weren't RC when you posted "lol" on a separate line.