In post 29, nancy wrote:VOTE: momo
I like this wagon. Darklyn is obvscum, however, so I should probably move my vote there soon.
Picking the largest wagon to get out of RVS, making note of my disfavor towards the tone in Darklyn's opening.
OMGUS on the aforementioned scum after eliciting a reaction to the momo wagon (from Transcend).
In post 51, nancy wrote:Grendel are you trying to obvtown in RVS.
Because it's working.
@TB usux
Lightly probing Grendel, making note of townvibes from the slot with the caveat that their behavior seems forced.
In post 56, nancy wrote:
LOL
I likes him more than I likes you.
I think he made a bad, not terrible, point though.
Responding in a jocular way to Grendel's questionable question while subtly expressing my disagreement with Crayon's agreement that the early wagon on momo was indicative of momo's alignment.
In post 64, nancy wrote: In post 60, momo wrote:Lets hop onto someone else's early wagon since they are fun. (Can't really hop on mine.
)
CAN'T YOU!?!?!?
VOTE: nancy
Demonstrating the phony upkeep of a respectable townie image inherent in momo's comment.
Voting a scum on radar and giving partial reads.
In post 129, nancy wrote:Oh noooooooo scum is voting me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
VOTE: momo
Your partner didn't want to bus but back to L-2 you go.
Voting a scum on radar in order to keep the wagon on him strong.
In post 151, nancy wrote:No, I just never read it. Let's say "tone" and "gut". Transcend is being Transcend.
Interacting in an oblique way to questions I do not approve of.
Sensing the quasi-RVS wagon on momo is in danger of growing stale, I bait an OMGUS out of Darklyn in an attempt to inject energy into the game again.
In post 158, nancy wrote:Attaboy Darklyn.
VOTE: momo
Mod error in VC 1.8 - I am counted twice
<< I have no idea what you're talking about
>>
Revote a scum on my radar.
Riley's response
In post 166, Rileycountant wrote:I don't trust this... ONCE TRANSY YELLED AT HER FOR MAKING A COMPETING WAGON SHE ACTS LIKE IT WAS FAKE ALL ALONG!!!!
Doesn't even attempt to see the motivation behind my vote, instead projects a fake and superficial narrative to justify a read.
Clarify that I was indeed joking when I called Darklyn obvscum in RVS.
In post 178, nancy wrote:(I was actually predicting the OMGUS and I'm now the competing wagon. Mission accomplished. Darklyn is a faithful servant.)
Explanation.
Riley's response
In post 185, Rileycountant wrote:NANCY IF YOU WERE TOWN YOU'D BE TRYING TA SOLVE THE GAME INSTEAD OF DOING NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!
In post 191, Rileycountant wrote: In post 189, Hiraki wrote:Can someone articulate anything that nancy has done that is actually scummy?
YEAH!!! SHE KEEPS REFUSING TO PLAY THE GAME!!! ALSO THAT THINGIE WITH THE COMPETING WAGONSIES WHERE SHE SOUNDED REALLY FAKE!!!!!
Still ignoring the actual substance of my posts to push a fake narrative. Shitposting is NAI, btw.
Prod at Riley to indicate whether or not they are seriously scumreading me.
In post 193, nancy wrote:Riley. Time to declare whether you're trolling here or whether you're serious. No take backs.
Forcing Riley to answer.
Riley's response
In post 194, Rileycountant wrote:I WAS SERIOUS!!!! YOU DOING STUFFSIES LIKE CLAIMING HUFFLEPUFF MEANS YA PREFER TO YELL AT PEOPLE RATHER THAN REALLY TRYING TA CATCH SCUM!!!!
Probably already caught a scum probably just caught another.
In post 195, nancy wrote:Good.
VOTE: Riley
Thanks.
1. Your scumhunting is fake as fuck.
I don't even need to count to 2.
Their answer resulting in a scumread. Voting said scumread.
Riley's response
In post 197, Rileycountant wrote: In post 196, nancy wrote: In post 192, Korts wrote:Well I have the L-3 vote on momo while calling Darklyn obvscum as a pretty fucking transparent thing that you don't do as someone who is trying to play the game
A. How is putting a scumread at L-3 scummy?
B. Humorous hyperbole.
BECAUSE YA AREN'T VOTING DARKLYN WHO YA SAID WAS OBVSCUM!!!!!!!!!! AND MY SCUMHUNTING ISN'T FAKE!!!! YOU'RE JUST MAD I CAUGHT YA AND SNEAKILY TRYING TA VOTE US BACK!!!!
Garcia. More fakery. Pretending to be unable to parse humor. (You only have 1 vote.)
The only appropriate answer to such an awful response.
Accountant's response
In post 202, Rileycountant wrote:Agree with Riley that nancy is scum, but it's not because of her being useless; it's because of the fact that she's using fake reaction tests to essentially be able to have a read without explaining why(see: votes on Darklyn and us). This is scum blatantly pushing for whatever lynches they want without having the burden of justifying why they're doing so, and then hiding under trolly behavior to try and get away with it.
Lolbullshit. The best I can say for this is scum attempting to fake conf!bias.
In post 196, nancy wrote: In post 192, Korts wrote:Well I have the L-3 vote on momo while calling Darklyn obvscum as a pretty fucking transparent thing that you don't do as someone who is trying to play the game
A. How is putting a scumread at L-3 scummy?
B. Humorous hyperbole.
Sorting Korts.