"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend
In post 192, Korts wrote:Well I have the L-3 vote on momo while calling Darklyn obvscum as a pretty fucking transparent thing that you don't do as someone who is trying to play the game -
But I don't think I have a real grip on this game
(Bolded for emphasis; Then proceeds to replace out)
In post 202, Rileycountant wrote:it's because of the fact that she's using fake reaction tests to essentially be able to have a read without explaining why(see: votes on Darklyn and us). This is scum blatantly pushing for whatever lynches they want without having the burden of justifying why they're doing so, and then hiding under trolly behavior to try and get away with it.
I actually didn't read the second part close enough and I want to push Rileycountant into a leaning SR but also I mentioned this fact. I also never got good feels during the JaeReed stuff, especially after skimming through the Banana Split game (might be different - it was the newbie game and not a major part of my decision but something that others may want to look into)
Going back to other people:
Fro99er is a holdover vote (Korts).
In post 305, Darklyn wrote:@Riley: not not really, I legit think nancy might be scum though
Wow - nothing.
Transcend is probably the worst offense on the wagon for early game shenanigans.
I want Trascend/ThinkBig 10x more (later is like 2x more) but in order to get the game moving:
It doesn't but now he has to explain his read - that's the juicy part.
And that's why I want him dead. He has promised to explain his reads and has been voting aimlessly this game and trying to see what sticks. He has contributed nothing.
Working on my case now.
I have officially retired this account. My new account is Virtuoso.
Your best bet on this wagon is that because you believe I'm defending Nancy that if she flips scum, you have a 1-2 punch. I'm not defending her if the only accusation toward her play that I can find is anti-town logic rather than actual reasons.
Here is why I am scum reading Darklyn and here is my case against him.
Post 11, 28, and 32 are all RVS votes from Darklyn. He made 3 RVS votes. By post 32, we should be starting to break out of the RVS mindset. Post 32, by the way, was made when Momo was at L-2. We had someone at L-2 and the best he can contribute was an RVS vote on nancy?
107 he votes for me and I ask him for an explanation. He promises one and has so far failed to deliver.
Post 206 you want to see more from horrordude, but you have barely contributed yourself and have made posts that are essentially contentless. How can you tell another player that you want to hear more from them but you haven't really contributed yourself?
His ISO is bad and he needs rope. I seriously don't want this anywhere near MyLo.
I have officially retired this account. My new account is Virtuoso.
In post 417, Hiraki wrote:Your best bet on this wagon is that because you believe I'm defending Nancy that if she flips scum, you have a 1-2 punch. I'm not defending her if the only accusation toward her play that I can find is anti-town logic rather than actual reasons.
If you think she's anti-town you shouldn't be that bothered if people vote for her, let her defend herself
ThinkBig wrote:Here is why I am scum reading Darklyn and here is my case against him.
Post 11, 28, and 32 are all RVS votes from Darklyn. He made 3 RVS votes. By post 32, we should be starting to break out of the RVS mindset. Post 32, by the way, was made when Momo was at L-2. We had someone at L-2 and the best he can contribute was an RVS vote on nancy?
107 he votes for me and I ask him for an explanation. He promises one and has so far failed to deliver.
Post 206 you want to see more from horrordude, but you have barely contributed yourself and have made posts that are essentially contentless. How can you tell another player that you want to hear more from them but you haven't really contributed yourself?
His ISO is bad and he needs rope. I seriously don't want this anywhere near MyLo.
Hey I read the whole game thread. Give me a super power!
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
In post 69, JaeReed wrote:k so since we have 3 maf and I know all 3 can't be that.
@nancy, RC, Trans if you guys are town just sheep me on korts if I die before you. getting this out there early since you all know my basic meta wrt nightkills, cheers.
So this is around 38 after which I start drawing preflips. I'm fine with a lynch in any of my bottom 2 tiers.
As Transcend pointed out, this read list so far is bullsht. Why am I in your second their as a town read? I have barely posted and contributed this game.
Getting brownie points by calling a list--a list already questioned by another player--BS, and specifically identifying that he was townread on that list. So scum.
In post 324, momo wrote:Can Riley, not Accountant, Riley, please explain why she can't type like a normal person.
Because typing like a hyper 5 your old girl is not genuine.
And not genuine is scum.
I will let Riley speak, but from my experience, she does this in all her games. She is probably just an alt who is trying way too hard to impersonate KainTepes.
lol. Just lol. In the middle of the the big nancy fiasco, TB comes back into the game to expound about Riley's posting style. Which nobody cares about except momo and Accountant.
And does a "I'm not defending but let me defend" tactic ("I will let Riley speak, but" here's an explanation anyways).
5.
In post 362, Hiraki wrote:I like ThinkBig 318 - even if I think it is too strenuous.
Insert eyeroll emoji here. 318 is him coming back to the thread and OMGUS voting the person who had just voted him since the last time TB had visited the thread.
I'm not going to touch 418 because of obvious reasons, but know I continue to have thoughts!
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
In post 144, Grendel wrote:Currently feeling like pushing Green Crayon's will just make me annoyed.
I wanted to get a solid read on him, but if he is just going to keep insulting my intelligence I can't be bothered.
Asshole Strategy: Success.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
And then some realchat: I've gone back and forth on nancy. I'm currently in the "don't vote" camp. I agree with Hiraki on this point.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
