Open 682: Watchmen Wanted -- Game Over Some People Won!!

[Alisae]

tunnel me if you want.

Why are you encouraging this again?

[-Grey-]

There is absolutely no reason that Lucca should be calling me town.

My play has been null AT BEST to someone that doesn't know me. I'd actually expect an unknown to be more likely to lean scum on me for leaning on a tunnel I set up pregame to avoid actually scumhunting and pointing out the fact my scumread of TB was vacuous (because it was).

How Lucca can possibly call it Towny can only be reasonably explained by him being scum and wanting to blend in with those townreading me.

[-Grey-]

Scum caught on page nine.

Damn, I'm good.

[lucca261]

Grey, read my play at the last page. do you think I've been wanting to blend in?

is it consistent?

I was voting Hawk already. why switch if I wanted to blend in?

[lucca261]

tunnel me if you want.

Why are you encouraging this again?

not concerned with his vote. it's making me gain more knowledge of his play and how to read him.

[-Grey-]

Grey, read my play at the last page. do you think I've been wanting to blend in?

is it consistent?

I was voting Hawk already. why switch if I wanted to blend in?

It's day 1. I don't care about your reads and interactions with others because I don't know their alignments.

I know mine. AND my play is always a hotbed of opportunism, so I use that to trap scum.

Better luck next game!

[Aubrey]

reading aubrey again, I'm not sure what was the post I wanted to vote him for.

meh. I think he's scum.

.....What?

You found multiple things that you thought was scummy on me. Voted me. Had one of your points challenged. You let it go, and forget the other reasons you had against me. Quickly re-read and couldn't re-find the reasoning. Yet you're still determined to scum read me?

VOTE: Lucca

Like what type of thought process is this?

[lucca261]

meh you're probably town.

VOTE: Aubrey

your vote is inconsistent and just easy pressure.

[-Grey-]

Alisae, your absence from this Scum wagon is conspicuous.

I know for a fact you aren't above bussing on d1, so go ahead and drop your vote on lucca.

[Alisae]

Allow me to appease you Grey!
VOTE: lucca
No seriously you scumread me again because why?

[-Grey-]

reading aubrey again, I'm not sure what was the post I wanted to vote him for.

meh. I think he's scum.

.....What?

You found multiple things that you thought was scummy on me. Voted me. Had one of your points challenged. You let it go, and forget the other reasons you had against me. Quickly re-read and couldn't re-find the reasoning. Yet you're still determined to scum read me?

VOTE: Lucca

Like what type of thought process is this?

Nyah nyah, I caught them first!

[lucca261]

ok, Aubrey:

I voted you because you spent the early D1 coasting and staying under the radar, dropping NAI bombs and empty statements, instead of trying to read people off their small interactions with each other.

once Not_Mafia voted you, you switched playstyle and began to focus exclusively on NotMafia. and then I voted you, and you do the same with me.

you're not engaging with people, you're waiting to people to engage with you.

and that's what I found scummy about you.

[lucca261]

wasn't I newbtown?

alisae is town though.

[-Grey-]

Allow me to appease you Grey!
VOTE: lucca
No seriously you scumread me again because why?

If I seriously scumread you, would I be using ?

[-Grey-]

wasn't I newbtown?

not newbtown.

[Alisae]

Allow me to appease you Grey!
VOTE: lucca
No seriously you scumread me again because why?

If I seriously scumread you, would I be using ?

Meh

[Hawk]

I was voting Hawk already. why switch if I wanted to blend in?

Scum claim. Basically said he knows I'm town.

VOTE: Lucca

[lucca261]

alisae thought I was newbtown.

not saying I am, just an interesting information.

but I'm not concerned with him. his vote is good.

the scummy vote is Aubrey.

[lucca261]

if I was scum, you would have the biggest wagon regardless.

changing my focus wouldn't be ideal.

[-Grey-]

This will be yet another d1 scum lynch brought to town, courtesy of -Grey-.

[-Grey-]

alisae thought I was newbtown.

A notion you clearly rejected.

[ThinkBig]

meh

you're probably town.

VOTE: Aubrey

your vote is inconsistent and just easy pressure.

Aubrey is probably town, but you're voting him for pressure? WTF

This is not town. I've played with Lucca before. This is not the same town!Lucca that I have played with.

@Mod, what's the VC?

Don't want to accidently hammer.

[ThinkBig]

UNVOTE:

If I haven't done so already.

[ThinkBig]

@MOD: Major snow storm approaching in my area. I'm declaring V/LA until Thursday. I will still probably be posting, but I may lose power.

[Aubrey]

You found them!

ok, Aubrey:

I voted you because you spent the early D1 coasting and staying under the radar, dropping NAI bombs and empty statements, instead of trying to read people off their small interactions with each other.

once Not_Mafia voted you, you switched playstyle and began to focus exclusively on NotMafia. and then I voted you, and you do the same with me.

you're not engaging with people, you're waiting to people to engage with you.

and that's what I found scummy about you.

It was day one. The oddest thing that happened was Hawks defensiveness (which I commented on) and me not understanding the push on TB.

So clearly this is a prime example of me only waiting for people to interact with myself.

The other pushes that happened afterwards didnt interest me all that much. Then I had to deal with TTH and the ever so lovely Not_Mafia and his still unknown push against me. Now we are where we are, and I'm still not on board with the push against TB (as I've mentioned) since it seems mostly based on meta that I don't know about, and it looks to me as if he is just starting to get serious. I don't fully get the

fake

posting bit.

Regarding my wavering stance with Hawk, again it was day one. If you are so foolish as to go into the first few days and generate set in stone reads then holy crap we are going to have a problem. Furthermore, are you challenging the fact that I said early defensiveness isn't a strong tell regarding Hawk? It's odd, but not damning. Unless you can argue that it is in fact a damning tell, then I don't see the issue with my "

eh

" stance on the matter.

Early on, it can be a pain in the ass for scum to have to generate content, and look natural. I'm going to be on the look out for that sort of thing from people. Guess who fell into that category? Not_Mafia and the person who sheeped a read and couldn't remember the other reasons they had against someone.