Open 681: Making Friends and Enemies [GAME OVER]

Fro99er · Post Post #550 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:52 pm

Anyway,

I'm quite convinced this is TvT

I'll stop wasting Jae's time

Fro99er · Post Post #551 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:52 pm

In post 550, Fro99er wrote:Anyway,

I'm quite convinced this is TvT

I'll stop wasting Jae's time

I KEEP PAGETOPPING WOOO

Fro99er · Post Post #552 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:59 pm

In post 547, JaeReed wrote:
In post 535, RadiantCowbells wrote:jae nancy is scum please.
Why? Her anti-town playstyle? NAI for her.

You're gonna kill me again...sorry

What makes her town here then if the anti-town is NAI?

Transcend · Post Post #553 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:00 pm

I'm at work please don't wagon me

Fro99er · Post Post #554 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:03 pm

In post 221, JaeReed wrote:
In post 200, Alisae wrote:

VOTE COUNT 1 . 10

nancy
--------- 5 ( momo, Korts, Darklyn, Rileycountant, Transcend )
L- 2

Momo
---------- 2 ( Thinkbig, JaeReed )
L- 5

ThinkBig
------ 1 ( Green Crayons )
L- 6

Transcend
----- 1 ( Hiraki )
L- 6

Rileycountant
- 1 ( nancy )
L- 6

Not Voting
---- 3 ( RadiantCowbells, horrordude0215, Grendel )

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to Lynch
Deadline is in (expired on 2017-03-25 08:15:00)

ThinkBig is on V/LA on weekends
@RC there's no way in hell I'm getting on a wagon with both Riley and Korts.

Korts has been doing jack all but making weak questions that won't sort shit and some weird ass LAMIST bullshit (probably not quite the word I'm looking for tbh). My point is it's superficial and not scumhunting then he's complaining about other's playstyles which I doubt he'd bother to do without putting real content out himself as town.

I don't even have a real read on nancy but I don't like the circle jerk and I don't like Korts being on the wagon and Accountant just flat out lied about his experiences with me.

In post 290, JaeReed wrote:
In post 267, nancy wrote:
In post 261, Rileycountant wrote:
In post 255, nancy wrote:
In post 238, Rileycountant wrote:Compare your entrance there and your entrance here - it's totally different.
Oh noo someone is changing their play from one game to another!!!!!!!!!!11one!!!11!!
The question at hand here isn't whether Jae changing their play is scummy. The question at hand here is whether or not Jae did change their play, because I said they did, and they said I was lying through my teeth.
Well, you are, so you kinda can't blame them.
If you're town, stop this. This is unnecessary and all I'm seeing is buddying. I can fight my own battles.

In post 429, JaeReed wrote:
In post 427, nancy wrote:I'm voting scum. Town!Transcend doesn't SR me here ever.
so I'm not just being bad with the bad feels on him this time?

In post 441, JaeReed wrote:
In post 436, nancy wrote:Fro99er is also weird this game btw. (I played with him in Pine's Death Trap very recently.) Not enough content to judge that yet.
ok enjoy having me in your pocket babe

VOTE: Transcend

pedit: you replaced a scum slot.
pedit2: agree not an omgus

I went ahead and read your ISO. Just for you. Because I like you

But based off this ISO, I'm not sure why you're townreading Nancy. (this isn't me shading you, this is me not understanding your read)

Fro99er · Post Post #555 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:03 pm

In post 553, Transcend wrote:I'm at work please don't wagon me

VOTE: transcendVOTE:

Fro99er · Post Post #556 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:04 pm

In post 555, Fro99er wrote:
In post 553, Transcend wrote:I'm at work please don't wagon me
VOTE: transcendVOTE:

FAKE NEWS VOTE

VOTE: Transcend

Fro99er · Post Post #557 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:04 pm

OH FUCK ME

VOTE: Transcend

Fro99er · Post Post #558 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:04 pm

UNVOTE:

WHEEE

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #559 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:06 pm

can we lynch nancy before she pockets jaereed and i have to fight her too?

JaeReed · Post Post #560 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:07 pm

In post 552, Fro99er wrote:
In post 547, JaeReed wrote:
In post 535, RadiantCowbells wrote:jae nancy is scum please.
Why? Her anti-town playstyle? NAI for her.
You're gonna kill me again...sorry

What makes her town here then if the anti-town is NAI?

Her tone wasn't bad, her content wasn't scummy, just anti-town, and there were a few key points, but mainly 427-436 I resonated. The response to TB's case on Dark, the fact that our reads seem to align. That sequence locked it in.

JaeReed · Post Post #561 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:07 pm

In post 559, RadiantCowbells wrote:can we lynch nancy before she pockets jaereed and i have to fight her too?

I need you to explain it or I'm never going to see it and am going to just assume you and Transcend are both scumfucks.

JaeReed · Post Post #562 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:08 pm

What I see is nancy being wagoned for an anti-town playstyle and I feel both of you should know better and to look at motivations behind things.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #563 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:12 pm

when has anyone assumed taht I didn't know something and been correct as opposed to not realizing stuff that I know beyond the scope of what they know

Darklyn · Post Post #564 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:13 pm

If they knew better they'd wagon her towards the end of day 1, RC's vote looked more like a joke than anything else, we still have 11 days to go she won't be lynched

Fro99er · Post Post #565 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:15 pm

In post 433, nancy wrote:RC I know is able to read me so the same more or less applies in terms of genuine SR = probscum.

pedit just calling it how I see it

I dunno. There were times RC had a genuine scumread of you in Pine's game

RC if I'm wrong tell me I'm wrong.

Transcend · Post Post #566 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:25 pm

JaeReed my theory is that you vote me every game and just bank on me being scum

Transcend · Post Post #567 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:25 pm

I have no factual idea why nancy is being townread by literally anyone

JaeReed · Post Post #568 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:57 pm

In post 566, Transcend wrote:JaeReed my theory is that you vote me every game and just bank on me being scum

No, I don't. I try to sort you every game and the conclusion I come to is scum.

For instance, this post? I can't see it coming from town. It's discrediting for the sake of discrediting instead of trying to work with me on what I have asked both you and RC for. I get that you think I'm shit tier but you're really not helping me improve my play if you're not even willing to attempt to help me see where I'm going wrong. And until you do that I'm not able to see what you see.

JaeReed · Post Post #569 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:58 pm

And if I can't under any circumstances understand what you're scumreading there when we all know nancy's usual play is anti-town bs then I'm going to assume you're just fabricating a read.

nancy · Post Post #570 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 6:31 pm

In post 564, Darklyn wrote:If they knew better they'd wagon her towards the end of day 1, RC's vote looked more like a joke than anything else, we still have 11 days to go she won't be lynched

Go read 219 and and 472 in context

nancy · Post Post #571 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 6:35 pm

In post 565, Fro99er wrote:I dunno. There were times RC had a genuine scumread of you in Pine's game

He was more paranoid of my slot in that game than anything, besides which it ended, we talked about why I did what, and he's had more experience with my play since.

Rileycountant · Post Post #572 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:22 pm

In post 324, momo wrote:Can Riley, not Accountant, Riley, please explain why she can't type like a normal person.

Because typing like a hyper 5 your old girl is not genuine.

And not genuine is scum.

whysies? COS I LIKE TYPING LIKE THIS!!!! I THINK IT'S WAY MORE GENUINE THAN PURPOSELY TYPING WEIRD LIKE AN ESSAY!!!!!!

Rileycountant · Post Post #573 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:46 pm

In post 411, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 410, Hiraki wrote:
In post 408, ThinkBig wrote:This makes no sense at all.
It doesn't but now he has to explain his read - that's the juicy part.
And that's why I want him dead. He has promised to explain his reads and has been voting aimlessly this game and trying to see what sticks. He has contributed nothing.

Working on my case now.

GRRR!!! TB!!!! I gotta say this now!!! I don't trust how ya always do safe stuff!!!! TO ME IT SEEMS LIKE YA NEVER REALLY PARTICIPATE WHEN PEOPLE ARE YELLING AT EACH OTHER!!!! EVEN WHEN ALI AND NANCY WERE YELLING AT EACH OTHER YA JUST SAID IT WAS YUCK AND RAN AWAY!!! AND YA ONLY VOTE PEOPLE THAT NOBODY THINKS ARE DANGEROUS!!!!! THAT SEEMS A LIL LIKE SCUM!!!!!

Rileycountant · Post Post #574 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:50 pm

In post 455, Hiraki wrote:
In post 435, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 426, Hiraki wrote:
In post 421, Green Crayons wrote:Insert eyeroll emoji here. 318 is him coming back to the thread and OMGUS voting the person who had just voted him since the last time TB had visited the thread.
There's no OMGUS and recent ThinkBig postings confirm that.

Spoiler: But See:
In post 107, Darklyn wrote:VOTE: ThinkBig found the scum

In post 112, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 107, Darklyn wrote:VOTE: ThinkBig found the scum
Please explain

In post 113, Darklyn wrote:All in due time my friend

In post 116, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 113, Darklyn wrote:All in due time my friend
I'll be waiting.

In post 317, Darklyn wrote:Third member is probably ThinkBig or horrordude

In post 318, ThinkBig wrote:Hey all. Still kinda hung over from the weekend. Will be posting more tonight.

In post 314, Darklyn wrote:is momo, dare I say it, town?
VOTE: Darklyn

Pressure vote for you to start providing content and contributing to the game. You have done nothing so far and have made no attempt to game solve. You voted for me, promised an explanation, failed to deliver, and now you are voting nancy. Your progression this game does not come from a town mindset.

Also doubling down on safe vote with safe (pointing out anti-town activity) case against player he was already focused on (but not really getting attention) is not what I'd call reassuring.
There are a lot of unreassuring things in this game and I think that focusing on one that is actually following up with what they said should be the least of your concerns rather than targeting them for actually being cohesive. ThinkBig also hasn't posted a lot. I'm just very confused that this is where your vote is. I didn't really want to look at it but your case on ThinkBig is defined as:

TB is a
very
safe player. He also buddies through insults and posts in infrequently.

By the way, we're on Day 1 (specifically Page 20) and the parts where he was "off-topic" because two people were discussing the facts was when the two facts were most prevalently being discussed.

I don't think you're being intentionality bad here but I can't agree (or even understand with the buddying part) with anything that you were saying.

HIRAKI!!!! TB SAID THAT NANCY WAS YUCKY AND SHADE THROWINGSIES EARLIER!!! but he didn't follow up on that!!! in fact he hasn't talked 'bout nancy pansy at ALL!!!!! don'tcha think that's a lil scummy? I THINK IT'S BECAUSE HE WANTS TO AVOID THE SPOTLIGHT!!!!