The second one
the implication is that pp was blocked or he's scum
The second one
In post 3326, CloudKicker wrote:titus youre lying, you fucking know what its like to be roleblocked, theres a dfference in "visisted no one" and receiving a blocked result
i just wanted to see her squirm but i opted not to do shady stuff just for entertainementIn post 3324, Dunnstral wrote:i thought you meant night 1 actuallyIn post 3320, CloudKicker wrote:i lied im kidding
Why did you say thisIn post 3256, PenguinPower wrote:Titus didn't track me.
So you agree that titus's claim is bollocksIn post 3335, Prince Lyon wrote:Fair enough.
I thought you were softing Watcher and blatantly so: if scum wanted to kill Schadd I don't think there's any chance that they would blow a roleblock on a neighbourizer claim.
Yes
no shit sherlocks holmes, pp cannot claim that he didnt neihborize, hed have to claim roleblocked and thats close to a scumclaimIn post 3340, Prince Lyon wrote:No, I think that PP didn't act because they are scum and not actually a neighbourizer.
another scumclaim, you literraly said "no one" and you are way too experienced to mix the 2 results
that doesn't throw shade on titus if pp didn't neighborize anyoneIn post 3336, CloudKicker wrote:As scum, i probably wouldnt block pp just to throw shade at totus, id rb another useful pr
I was blocked. I went for Dunn.In post 3321, Titus wrote:Well, either two fer or I was blocked.
Sure he can, he's already done it once and we lynched spade_aceIn post 3342, CloudKicker wrote:pp cannot claim that he didnt neihborize
its just extremely inefficient and is banking on town to lynch those slotsIn post 3345, Dunnstral wrote:that doesn't throw shade on titus if pp didn't neighborize anyoneIn post 3336, CloudKicker wrote:As scum, i probably wouldnt block pp just to throw shade at totus, id rb another useful pr
like, if he was roleblocked he knows so