In post 753, RadiantCowbells wrote:nancy you are getting sleepy when I snap my fingers you will be under my control
*snaps*
you will vote hapahauli
In post 755, nancy wrote:Except that I think you're scum with Transcend, so no. You're both weird as fuck this game.
In post 756, RadiantCowbells wrote:what part of you are hypnotized right now is confusing you
In post 757, nancy wrote:The part where I don't want to help you with your bus.
wanna vote nancy for this.In post 761, nancy wrote:Honestly I don't care if you bus your partner D1 you and Transcend both pushed as hard as fuck to get me quicklynched and you're scum for it.
In post 801, Titus wrote:VOTE: hapahauli
I'm not dealing with toxic playing right now. If you're town and threatening to gamethrow, die. If you're scum, yippie.
I know this is a thing to say but not feeling this.In post 850, nancy wrote:Just trust me on Transcend.
this could be tryhard scum but really feeling serioustry townIn post 859, Grendel wrote:I'll jus quote itnancy wrote:xPIn post 852, Fro99er wrote:I hereby trust you on transcend
pedit link me to the case?In post 722, Grendel wrote:Darklyn’s voting habits jump between the most popular wagon, and anybody remotely suspicious of him. His complacency about nancy, in that he was satisfied in seeing her lynched when he hadn’t given any reason on his part why she is a good lynch. Aside from gut I guess?
Scum are likely to call out lurking buddies out of because their informed prespective makes the lurking appear much worse than it would to town. So they try to pull their buddies out of the wood work so nobody starts scum reading them for their absence. Also some scum seem to think that is a good tactic for distancing early in the game in my previous experiences.In post 206, Darklyn wrote:Would like to see more from horrordude0215
Spoiler:
His assumption that a the the scum [HirkixThinkBigxNancy] is that one player is hard defending one buddy, while another is attacking Darklyn, who was amoung the most set in having nancy lynched. Would be two risky maneuvers that wouldn’t happen at the same time, or at the least happen this early in the game.
Really wants to end the day early when out of the players on the wagon he had the least openly developed reads. This doesn't display much interest in game solving.In post 467, Darklyn wrote:QUICKHAMMER TIME
Closed reason for nancy being scum outside of gut. Also a very ironic comment. I've retired the tell that scum are more likely to project things they themselves are guilty for onto other players, but ugh, I think it fits Darklyn play super well.In post 501, Darklyn wrote:that just sounds like intimidation "if you vote for me you're scum!"In post 491, nancy wrote:No because literally the only way I get mislynched today is by all the scum being on my wagon.
Spoiler:
These posts really don't look genuine to me, and neither do all the jokey responses in his iso. He is trying the play the "I'm a flippant and funny guy" card super hard, and it all looks really forced. Like an overcompensation.
His iso it very information minimal, and he dosen’t expond on much beyond scum reads, or when a scum read transitions into town/null.
And more recently this happened:
Look at this. Being so quick to ditch his scum read if nancy sheeps him shows just how little depth there is to his read. He wanted nancy quick lynched just days before. It looks like he doesn’t believe his own reads doesn’t it?In post 670, Darklyn wrote:VOTE: Grendel
nancy, I'll get off your back if you help me lynch this guy
Pausing here to note that yes, I've seen nancy is sitting at three votes, and no, I'm not sure how much that is coloring my perception of her posts.In post 1278, Green Crayons wrote:I know this is a thing to say but not feeling this.In post 850, nancy wrote:Just trust me on Transcend.
are you seriousIn post 932, Titus wrote:I am more surprised at JaeReed not pushing Grendel if he's preferred lynch.
Why is there a momo wagon? Why is Grendel scummy and not wagoned?
scumpostIn post 1047, nancy wrote:I'm honestly not even going to fight this push regardless of how shit it is because my flip kills 2 out 3 scum.
The issue I have you Accountant is that you're too sure of yourself. You don't stop to re-examine your reasoning and find where there may be flaws. You don't stop to check that you might be looking in all the wrong places for all the wrong things, you just conjure up a scenario for yourself where X is scum and make the pieces fit. It's bad scumhunting and your reads will always be flawed as long as you continue to base them on rhetoric and posture rather than on actually assuming the perspective of the individual you're hunting.
Case in point: Tell me why scum!me would post 1035. What is scum!me trying to gain from this? I have town!Jae trapped in contradictions and I offer them a way out because ______?
watIn post 1084, nancy wrote:There surely is.In post 1075, Titus wrote:?In post 1074, Darklyn wrote:well there are two players but they seem a bit too obvious
There's a hidden dynamic that's confusing here.
VOTE: Grendel
VOTE: Grendel
no u
yes I am bad. NEXTIn post 1134, Fro99er wrote:And GC freely admits this and has said so in this game
if this is serious i hate you because I actually picked up on Jae being mason gdiIn post 1169, Fro99er wrote:what if I told you jae is conftown?
Explain this to me.In post 1192, Fro99er wrote:Titus could theoretically townread me and she didn't. And I think that actually makes her town.
Where have you been?
This is lolbad and a great scum hammer (blaming the victim; playing off of not doing a catch-up, just going with the mob flow).In post 801, Titus wrote:VOTE: hapahauli
I'm not dealing with toxic playing right now. If you're town and threatening to gamethrow, die. If you're scum, yippie.
r u srsIn post 959, Titus wrote:Grendel's reads suck. Noted. But why does Grendel shoot RC?
Oh wow I am not surprised at all that there's a Grendel vote after basically begging for a reason to be allowed on this wagon by obvtown frog.In post 1075, Titus wrote:?In post 1074, Darklyn wrote:well there are two players but they seem a bit too obvious
There's a hidden dynamic that's confusing here.
VOTE: Grendel
I think this should get pressure too.
This attempt to be engaged was a wet fart and so Titus went silent on it, but still nonetheless there's the Grendel vote.In post 968, Fro99er wrote:I have no idea. The three of us (plus nancy) just finished a game where RC led town to victory. I'm guessing Grendel is aware of what town!RC can do.In post 964, Titus wrote:True but humor me.In post 963, Fro99er wrote:i'm not worried about thatIn post 959, Titus wrote:Grendel's reads suck. Noted. But why does Grendel shoot RC?
scum!Grendel has two scumbuddies, ya know
"Nobody asked, but here are two game strategies: one which I freely admit cannot be pursued and the second which absolves me of any responsibilities for my mislynches. Yes this is TOTALLY TOWN GUYS."In post 1233, Titus wrote:UNVOTE: Grendel
There's two optimal plays but we lost 1.
The first, quick lynch and lynch anything that doesn't claim mason.
Second, let the masons pick the choices with everyone contributing unless they feel buddied/incapable.
<must input town frustration post to let others know I am town>In post 1257, Titus wrote:The only players that are impossible to be scum are the masons. I'm just rather annoyed at the claim situation at the moment.In post 1255, nancy wrote:Darklyn is apparently impossible to be scum according to Fro99er.
You Grendel's buddy? Why you scared?
lolIn post 1296, Titus wrote:word vomit
