I like to lynch miller claims on day2, far from lylo, but let them do and say whatever they want on day1 + 2 and then their flip on end of day2 becomes really informative for the rest of the game.In post 372, eagerSnake wrote:Why don't you lynch it D1 exactly? What is the utility in keeping it alive even if you disbelieve it?It's not invalid to disbelieve it, no. But even if you don't believe the claim, you don't lynch it D1 unless you REALLY don't believe it, and your reasoning for that is faulty (and intentionally obstinate, might I add).In post 366, eagerSnake wrote:I mean it's not invalid as a backup watcher to disbelieve a miller claim in a 10v3 normal.
Because you might be wrongIn post 372, eagerSnake wrote:Why don't you lynch it D1 exactly? What is the utility in keeping it alive even if you disbelieve it?It's not invalid to disbelieve it, no. But even if you don't believe the claim, you don't lynch it D1 unless you REALLY don't believe it, and your reasoning for that is faulty (and intentionally obstinate, might I add).In post 366, eagerSnake wrote:I mean it's not invalid as a backup watcher to disbelieve a miller claim in a 10v3 normal.
I wasn't asking you thoughIn post 377, rb wrote:I like to lynch miller claims on day2, far from lylo, but let them do and say whatever they want on day1 + 2 and then their flip on end of day2 becomes really informative for the rest of the game.In post 372, eagerSnake wrote:Why don't you lynch it D1 exactly? What is the utility in keeping it alive even if you disbelieve it?It's not invalid to disbelieve it, no. But even if you don't believe the claim, you don't lynch it D1 unless you REALLY don't believe it, and your reasoning for that is faulty (and intentionally obstinate, might I add).In post 366, eagerSnake wrote:I mean it's not invalid as a backup watcher to disbelieve a miller claim in a 10v3 normal.
might be right too, and statistically towns win more often when you lynch town on day1 - and letting a miller claim anywhere near lylo is just retarded.In post 379, Something_Smart wrote:Because you might be wrongIn post 372, eagerSnake wrote:Why don't you lynch it D1 exactly? What is the utility in keeping it alive even if you disbelieve it?It's not invalid to disbelieve it, no. But even if you don't believe the claim, you don't lynch it D1 unless you REALLY don't believe it, and your reasoning for that is faulty (and intentionally obstinate, might I add).In post 366, eagerSnake wrote:I mean it's not invalid as a backup watcher to disbelieve a miller claim in a 10v3 normal.
explaining things and interacting with people is scummy?In post 382, Boonskiies wrote:a combination of all your posts.
Scum usually need to hear cases on them more than town anyways. Scum also fabricate and explain cases more than town does.
if you're town, then you can probably outline how i'm playing badlyIn post 384, Boonskiies wrote:like if rb is town, he's playing really badly. I like to think he isn't that bad of a player.
In post 377, rb wrote:I like to lynch miller claims on day2, far from lylo, but let them do and say whatever they want on day1 + 2 and then their flip on end of day2 becomes really informative for the rest of the game.In post 372, eagerSnake wrote:Why don't you lynch it D1 exactly? What is the utility in keeping it alive even if you disbelieve it?It's not invalid to disbelieve it, no. But even if you don't believe the claim, you don't lynch it D1 unless you REALLY don't believe it, and your reasoning for that is faulty (and intentionally obstinate, might I add).In post 366, eagerSnake wrote:I mean it's not invalid as a backup watcher to disbelieve a miller claim in a 10v3 normal.
Surprised no one is saying this is "setting up mislynches" yetIn post 383, rb wrote:might be right too, and statistically towns win more often when you lynch town on day1 - and letting a miller claim anywhere near lylo is just retarded.In post 379, Something_Smart wrote:Because you might be wrongIn post 372, eagerSnake wrote:Why don't you lynch it D1 exactly? What is the utility in keeping it alive even if you disbelieve it?It's not invalid to disbelieve it, no. But even if you don't believe the claim, you don't lynch it D1 unless you REALLY don't believe it, and your reasoning for that is faulty (and intentionally obstinate, might I add).In post 366, eagerSnake wrote:I mean it's not invalid as a backup watcher to disbelieve a miller claim in a 10v3 normal.
I prefer doing it on day2, but it's no big loss to do it on day1 either.
in what way am I tunneling?In post 392, Boonskiies wrote:And you constantly need to be reassured of all reasons why you are scum. Just read the damn game and you'll see why people are scum reading you. Look at it from the other side and stop being a tunnel fuck.
