You might be scum too, scum reading the idlers. it's usually scum who pushes idler lynches d1.In post 545, hapahauli wrote:Like Eddie and DarkShadow are basically doing what you did as mafia in Open 678.In post 542, ThinkBig wrote:This is a good point. I've lost so many games due to nasty TVT and the scum team just sitting back and letting town eat itself alive. It's one of the things I need to work on in my playIn post 538, hapahauli wrote:It does not guarantee town, but given the dynamics of the game so far and other traits in their filter (emotional, posting the first thing that comes to their mind, etc), I'm pretty sure it's town.In post 534, Something_Smart wrote:This does not equal town.In post 529, hapahauli wrote:They're contributing, have their try-hard pants on, and are the driving force behind the game.
Who's more likely to be mafia? The two idiots screaming at each other in thread, or the guys in the background letting it happen?
I understand there's always margin for error in Day 1 cases, but going after people that are sitting back in the shadows are far more likely to turn up mafia than loud, controversial, and emotional players.
You're making the same fallacy. Why can't a bunch of idiots screaming at each other be all town? Anyway, I'm more interested in below...In post 547, Something_Smart wrote:It implies that the answer can't be both. With the amount of idiots screaming at each other this game has had, one of them is almost certainly scum. Though I am in agreement that the right place to look for scum right now is in the people in the background.In post 543, hapahauli wrote:How is it false? It's what I see happen repeatedly in games on this site. People go after the loud, controversial targets for lynches, and mafia lets town eat itself alive.
What are your reasons?Why are those two things inconsistent? I think Eddie is scum, but not for the reasons you listed.Why are you even attacking my reasoning if you are suspicious of EddieCane as well? To be voting him in this spot, you should realize that most of what I'm saying is valid.
he did, he just didn't specify what prIn post 554, TwoFace wrote:transcend didn't actually claim a pr though.
Does a team of rb/Transcend/Eddie make sense at this point?In post 561, TwoFace wrote:you can basically ignore most of it. transcend and rb are caught scum
nope, what he did was basically claim something very vague that doesn't even remotely sound like a PRIn post 556, Eddie Cane wrote:he did, he just didn't specify what prIn post 554, TwoFace wrote:transcend didn't actually claim a pr though.
I will have to look into eddie, as I have not paid as much attention to his postsIn post 564, ThinkBig wrote:Does a team of rb/Transcend/Eddie make sense at this point?In post 561, TwoFace wrote:you can basically ignore most of it. transcend and rb are caught scum
He's arrogant, direct, confident, emotional, insulting other players, etc.In post 562, eagerSnake wrote:You hapa
how can town be eating itself alive when we have 2 basically confirmed scum caught?In post 567, hapahauli wrote:I find it much more likely that scum are lurking away while town eats itself alive
Because your logic might not be as sound as you think it is?In post 568, TwoFace wrote:how can town be eating itself alive when we have 2 basically confirmed scum caught?In post 567, hapahauli wrote:I find it much more likely that scum are lurking away while town eats itself alive
why do people always want to do that? just cause we caught scum easily, doesn't mean you have to downplay my logic. I mean even if it isn't as sound as I think it is, chalk it up to scum caught for the wrong reasons.In post 569, hapahauli wrote:Because your logic might not be as sound as you think it is?
not as bad as whatever bullshit reason you have for voting me