Mini Normal 1893 - I Keep Modding Minis Ending in 3 -endgame
-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
I have a habit of noticing what other people sign off as jokey posts as being indicative, might be conf bias but I'm playing with the idea that posts like these are generally scummy.In post 156, Juri wrote:
Received a scum role PM. I'm the roleblocker. VOTE: JuriIn post 153, Transcend wrote:juri tell me in 10 words or less why you're scum
I don't see this as coming from town, looks liek it's coming from scum who wants to reduce the pressure of a vote.In post 504, Juri wrote:I actually kind of like this. I think that shooting for me (as an actual wagon canditate rather than as pressure) is not a very opportunistic thing to do. Seems driven by genuine thoughts about me, however tentative they might be.
That's so meta-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
Feels like he re-thought his darklyn read as darklyn had more pressure rather than as a response to any of dark's posts.In post 1542, Juri wrote:
Although I will be trying to reread some of his interactions with others in context and think about them.In post 1541, Juri wrote:No
At present I don't think I want to vote him today though. More and more I feel like my anti-Darklyn sentiments were misguided. ISO really parses pretty townlike right now. Also even if I was into a Darklyn lynch I'd want him to post today first before going ahead with it.That's so meta-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
I'm not scum, and gerry's about a coinflip for me right now. From my own perspective, this is Juri passing town v town to throw shade at both of us.In post 1543, Juri wrote:
This almost feels like scum on scum interactionIn post 1527, Trivium wrote:Mmm thinking about it a bit, I don't want a dark lynch if gerry is going to be on it. VOTE: gerryoat
That's so meta-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
Carefully answering his own question here. Preventing questions asked? Further conversation stopper? That might be a stretch.In post 1544, Juri wrote:Not that associatives are any good without a red corpse mind youThat's so meta-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
In post 1645, Juri wrote:
Every journey's gotta start with a step. I wanted to put some extra pressure on him and see what happened. I think in general it is helpful to be willing to participate in pressuring players. Turns out it's been informative, although maybe in a bad way for us.In post 1605, Dunnstral wrote:
Why did you vote them here?In post 1576, Juri wrote:
VOTE: ContradictionIn post 1575, Contradiction wrote:
I'm not getting lynched today.In post 1563, Dunnstral wrote:Yea; let's kill dark
Damn I must have read over post 1580 without noticing it somehow. First of all, reaction tests are a common fallback for scum when things go wrong. Second of all, even I figured the vote was a sort of joke, and didn't pay much attention to it, but then Juri gets asked about it and falls back on the idea that the vote's a reaction test? Look like making up reasoning that supports his actions.In post 1580, Juri wrote:Well I guess if I'm gonna do stuff for reactions I gotta wear it when it goes wrong.
I like this claim even less than I liked Dunn's one. I'm really not sure why we feel the need to flop claims out D1.
Maybe this is a meta thing I'm improperly adjusted toThat's so meta-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
In post 1782, Trivium wrote:Though asking if it's a meta thing seems towny, I wouldn't expect scum to wonder if they're somehow out of touch when it comes toscumreading.That's so meta-
-
mhsmith0 Balancing Act
- Balancing Act
- Balancing Act
- Posts: 10830
- Joined: March 7, 2016
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Mono has been proddedShowhttp://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mhsmith0
Conq: you, sir, are great at being town.
BATMAN: Only jugg was the only one we didn’t scum read at least not me
Quick: There is little to no chance this slot is Power-Wolfing.
SR: I want to give him a day
Life is simply unfair, don't you think?-
-
Titus She/herMoon WalkerShe/her
- Moon Walker
- Moon Walker
- Posts: 80307
- Joined: May 3, 2013
- Pronoun: She/her
Ok, who is trying to do vca on day 2 without a scumflip? Seriously stahp it.
ThinkBig, talk to mama. Come on and play.ShowThe scum had the misfortune of Titus being absurdly accurate on day one.Really quite impressed by that.~Drixx
You're letting Titus win the game by herself.Good luck now I guess.You have no chance to win.~Tywin
GTKTitus Part 2
Titus Academy
VLA Friday nights until Sunday morning.
All hail the Scum Empress!-
-
Juri
-
-
Juri Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 67
- Joined: March 8, 2017
-
-
TheFuzzylogic99 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4534
- Joined: August 19, 2013
- Location: Texas
-
-
Juri
-
-
boring Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1538
- Joined: June 15, 2016
-
-
momo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: February 23, 2017
- Location: Timezone: EST
-
-
Juri
-
-
Juri Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 67
- Joined: March 8, 2017
I don't understand thisIn post 1790, boring wrote:that was a suspiciously timed vote.-
-
Juri Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 67
- Joined: March 8, 2017
-
-
Juri Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 67
- Joined: March 8, 2017
I kind of eyerolled at this the first time I read it because my post was both a joke and serious at the same time, but wow this thought process is super town.In post 1781, Trivium wrote:In post 1645, Juri wrote:
Every journey's gotta start with a step. I wanted to put some extra pressure on him and see what happened. I think in general it is helpful to be willing to participate in pressuring players. Turns out it's been informative, although maybe in a bad way for us.In post 1605, Dunnstral wrote:
Why did you vote them here?In post 1576, Juri wrote:
VOTE: ContradictionIn post 1575, Contradiction wrote:
I'm not getting lynched today.In post 1563, Dunnstral wrote:Yea; let's kill dark
Damn I must have read over post 1580 without noticing it somehow. First of all, reaction tests are a common fallback for scum when things go wrong. Second of all, even I figured the vote was a sort of joke, and didn't pay much attention to it, but then Juri gets asked about it and falls back on the idea that the vote's a reaction test? Look like making up reasoning that supports his actions.In post 1580, Juri wrote:Well I guess if I'm gonna do stuff for reactions I gotta wear it when it goes wrong.
I like this claim even less than I liked Dunn's one. I'm really not sure why we feel the need to flop claims out D1.
Maybe this is a meta thing I'm improperly adjusted to
If I'm likely to be flipping shortly then I want you guys to remember that Dunnstral and Triv are super super town okay-
-
Juri Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 67
- Joined: March 8, 2017
-
-
boring Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1538
- Joined: June 15, 2016
I was just openly considering the slot along with a few others, and Dunnstral basically said the only acceptable vote in my pool was that slot. So you'd have two potential "approvals" with the vote.In post 1793, Juri wrote:
I don't understand thisIn post 1790, boring wrote:that was a suspiciously timed vote.
You were gearing up to be the main wagon, and then you call out the lack of voters and follow it by a vote with a recent scummy mention.
It looks like someone trying to start a viable counter wagon.
The reason I haven't voted the slot yet also plays into my concern with the timing. See, Impoetic feels scummy in her ISO, but she had a few non-game-related posts that were boldly ignorant, which makes me question whether it was her personality/playstyle that bothered me in particular.
Her replacement gives us a fresh chance to read her slot sans personality, but you voted the slot before Titus actually did anything. Unless you were super sure (which you've since admitted you're not), it makes no sense for town to vote a replacement slot during the replacement period.
It was just all-around suspicious timing.-
-
Juri Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 67
- Joined: March 8, 2017
That's a good explanation, thank youIn post 1797, boring wrote:
I was just openly considering the slot along with a few others, and Dunnstral basically said the only acceptable vote in my pool was that slot. So you'd have two potential "approvals" with the vote.In post 1793, Juri wrote:
I don't understand thisIn post 1790, boring wrote:that was a suspiciously timed vote.
You were gearing up to be the main wagon, and then you call out the lack of voters and follow it by a vote with a recent scummy mention.
It looks like someone trying to start a viable counter wagon.
The reason I haven't voted the slot yet also plays into my concern with the timing. See, Impoetic feels scummy in her ISO, but she had a few non-game-related posts that were boldly ignorant, which makes me question whether it was her personality/playstyle that bothered me in particular.
Her replacement gives us a fresh chance to read her slot sans personality, but you voted the slot before Titus actually did anything. Unless you were super sure (which you've since admitted you're not), it makes no sense for town to vote a replacement slot during the replacement period.
It was just all-around suspicious timing.-
-
Juri Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 67
- Joined: March 8, 2017
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-
-