Is your brain a little addled?
He votes Transcend for what seems like very policy-esque reasons, and not because he's suspicious. Also, he throws in an attempt to discredit SS's claim without really doing anything with it. I see mafia very frequently doing these types of discrediting plays - they throw something at a wall and don't really do anything with it (and hope other people latch onto it). I feel like if his suspicion on SS was actually legitimate, he'd be much more concerned with him on D2.In post 67, Darkshadow64540 wrote:Wouldn't an early miller claim be ideal by scum? They get to look townie and avoid any investigation...
That said my vote is still VOTE: transcend for checking in at least twice and not giving more than a vote, you signed up to play mafia so actually get in here.
(not sure if the prior vote counted with the improper tag so here's a clean one)
why did you not call that post out yesterday if you have such a problem with it? (if you did ignore me)In post 1009, hapahauli wrote:I think we're going down the wrong path here. People that are obstinate and uncooperative probably aren't the mafia. People that are lurking in the shadows likely are.
VOTE: Darkshadow64540
He has the worst vote of anyone on D1.He votes Transcend for what seems like very policy-esque reasons, and not because he's suspicious. Also, he throws in an attempt to discredit SS's claim without really doing anything with it. I see mafia very frequently doing these types of discrediting plays - they throw something at a wall and don't really do anything with it (and hope other people latch onto it). I feel like if his suspicion on SS was actually legitimate, he'd be much more concerned with him on D2.In post 67, Darkshadow64540 wrote:Wouldn't an early miller claim be ideal by scum? They get to look townie and avoid any investigation...
That said my vote is still VOTE: transcend for checking in at least twice and not giving more than a vote, you signed up to play mafia so actually get in here.
(not sure if the prior vote counted with the improper tag so here's a clean one)
I've also been pretty displeased with his contributions today. A lot of null-leaning-one-way reads, and suspicion on aronagundy that he didn't elaborate on until he was asked to do so.
I am pretty sure it's not a thing. Mafia vig ban ended it afaik.In post 1013, hapahauli wrote:Also, someonepleaselet me know if there's any way that mafia can get 2 KP in Normal Games. It plays super heavily into how I'm thinking about the game, and I need anyone more experienced on this site to confirm this.
Around the time I was going to elaborate, TwoFace explained Transcend's "slip" to me. Thinking Transcend was mafia, I discounted my scumread on Darkshadow pretty heavily. It wouldn't make sense for Darkshadow to just go at his scumbuddy so hard so early on. Didn't read like a bus vote either.In post 1015, Eddie Cane wrote:why did you not call that post out yesterday if you have such a problem with it? (if you did ignore me)In post 1009, hapahauli wrote:I think we're going down the wrong path here. People that are obstinate and uncooperative probably aren't the mafia. People that are lurking in the shadows likely are.
VOTE: Darkshadow64540
He has the worst vote of anyone on D1.He votes Transcend for what seems like very policy-esque reasons, and not because he's suspicious. Also, he throws in an attempt to discredit SS's claim without really doing anything with it. I see mafia very frequently doing these types of discrediting plays - they throw something at a wall and don't really do anything with it (and hope other people latch onto it). I feel like if his suspicion on SS was actually legitimate, he'd be much more concerned with him on D2.In post 67, Darkshadow64540 wrote:Wouldn't an early miller claim be ideal by scum? They get to look townie and avoid any investigation...
That said my vote is still VOTE: transcend for checking in at least twice and not giving more than a vote, you signed up to play mafia so actually get in here.
(not sure if the prior vote counted with the improper tag so here's a clean one)
I've also been pretty displeased with his contributions today. A lot of null-leaning-one-way reads, and suspicion on aronagundy that he didn't elaborate on until he was asked to do so.
I was super torn about it, but at the end of the day, his claim just didn't make sense.In post 1017, eagerSnake wrote:Explain why you lynched the friendly neighbor
I unvote him as soon as he claimed. I'm town, and so I expected other townies to do the same
Yet instead, you lynched him
His behavior suggested town. But I could not for the life of me figure out how his claim made sense at all.In post 796, hapahauli wrote:Like here's my problem:
Transcend's claim makes no sense.
"Supreme dickishness" analysis suggests that Transcend is town.
And I need to find some way to square this.
It didn't make any sense at all why he wouldn't have believed the miller claim with the role he had. I thought he had to be lying about the claim. On top of this was the "I think SS is confirmed mafia, but let's lynch someone else" stuff.In post 849, hapahauli wrote:Yeah.In post 840, Boonskiies wrote:If that was actually his role he should have BELIEVED the miller claim. Like oh my god, he could have confirmed if it was real or not, which makes TOTAL sense with setup spec.
VOTE: Transcend
We have a claimed vigIn post 1013, hapahauli wrote:Also, someonepleaselet me know if there's any way that mafia can get 2 KP in Normal Games. It plays super heavily into how I'm thinking about the game, and I need anyone more experienced on this site to confirm this.
No shit. I'm trying to figure out if he's conf-town, or if there's a possible mafia fake claim.In post 1020, rb wrote:We have a claimed vigIn post 1013, hapahauli wrote:Also, someonepleaselet me know if there's any way that mafia can get 2 KP in Normal Games. It plays super heavily into how I'm thinking about the game, and I need anyone more experienced on this site to confirm this.