world.createNew(Utopia everHope); - EPILOGUE (GAME OVER!)

Randomnamechange · Post Post #2650 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 7:32 am

In post 2648, KidAmn wrote:The only thing making me doubt Clumsy/Mathblade is how many lurkers we have who might just be letting us get distracted by Mathblade.

this is my issue. im worried that scum are lurking to victory

The Bulge · Post Post #2651 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 7:39 am

In post 2650, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 2648, KidAmn wrote:The only thing making me doubt Clumsy/Mathblade is how many lurkers we have who might just be letting us get distracted by Mathblade.
this is my issue. im worried that scum are lurking to victory

Does anyone strike you as actively lurking tho?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #2652 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 7:42 am

VOTE: Clumsy

Randomnamechange · Post Post #2653 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 8:16 am

In post 2651, The Bulge wrote:
In post 2650, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 2648, KidAmn wrote:The only thing making me doubt Clumsy/Mathblade is how many lurkers we have who might just be letting us get distracted by Mathblade.
this is my issue. im worried that scum are lurking to victory
Does anyone strike you as actively lurking tho?

not particularly. thats why i said lurking and not active lurking.

KidAmn · Post Post #2654 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 8:29 am

In post 2651, The Bulge wrote:
In post 2650, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 2648, KidAmn wrote:The only thing making me doubt Clumsy/Mathblade is how many lurkers we have who might just be letting us get distracted by Mathblade.
this is my issue. im worried that scum are lurking to victory
Does anyone strike you as actively lurking tho?

Gerry is putting on a masterclass in typing lots of words and not really producing a whole lot of coherent and/or original thought

Momo is just sheeping and buddying onto anyone he can (and actively misrep'd Mathblade saying they were angry at multiple people when they were/are really only truly pissed at me) and sat on the fence on the Maria wagon so hard they're going to give birth to a 2x4

In post 2265, momo wrote:I agree with the case on Maria but it is WAY TOO early for a lynch.

Anyone pushing for a lynch this early is either bad town or scum.

Kid, since you had the sense to unvote, want to analyze this wagon together???

In post 2268, momo wrote:I agree with maria wagon but it is pretty early. My vote will go on in 24 hours unless I can dissect something from the wagon until then.

In post 2355, momo wrote:
In post 2278, MathBlade wrote:My logic is fine.

I have two games that disprove your point.

You don't not lynch someone because of a claim.

You don't not lynch someone because of their play.

MariaR's play just doesn't make sense for a doctor.

I just don't believe the claim. Like even kid said that Maria is not acting like a doctor. Unless another extremely viable wagon comes up. I will vote Maria

Until it became clear Math was going to lead a couple of townies + I expect most of the scumteam off the cliff.

The thing is Math's reads on Maria and Giga (plus myself, obviously) were so utterly wrong in where they came from that it's hard to call it as their Civ-Mafia town game, or Math being intelligent enough to mimic their Civ-Mafia town game. Either way there were a lot of scum on that Maria wagon because she made it damn easy for them, and the hard resistance to the Clumsy wagon despite Giga posting the only real case of the last day cements that for me, as does this Giga/Math interaction

In post 2515, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2513, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:because he pings ur gut
Townpings yep.
Clumsy townpings my gut.

In post 2521, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2516, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:
MathBlade wrote:
In post 2513, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:because he pings ur gut
Townpings yep.
Clumsy townpings my gut.
compelling case
Not really but it is honest unlike the Clumsy one.

In post 2524, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2523, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:
In post 2521, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2516, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:
MathBlade wrote:
In post 2513, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:because he pings ur gut
Townpings yep.
Clumsy townpings my gut.
compelling case
Not really but it is honest unlike the Clumsy one.
how is the clumsy case dishonest

rc didnt lie about game events lmfao

gerryoat wrote:no, only cause i think clumsy is mafia goon and maria is an important maf PR. maybe something that can allow maf to do something important tonight
why would scum let the wagons be SvS here??

gerry can i get like a readlist your perception of the gamestate seems dumb
Gerry Clumsy is probably town because of this. This is an honest point by Giga.

But a scum case on a town player is inherently dishonest.

Clumsy "gut townpings" for Math and they chainsaw for Clumsy saying the case is "inherently dishonest" which is a really nice way of not actually countering any of the points made in said case

gerryoat · Post Post #2655 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 9:08 am

In post 2633, Vecna wrote:VOTE: Gerryoat

Scum detected, town meta violated.

wat is my town meta?

Randomnamechange · Post Post #2656 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 9:09 am

i agree that math's switch on clumsy today has been horrible

Randomnamechange · Post Post #2657 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 9:10 am

that was @kid btw

gerryoat · Post Post #2658 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 9:14 am

After investigations, I suspect Clusmy is sided with the mafia.

KidAmn · Post Post #2659 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 9:17 am

In post 2658, gerryoat wrote:After investigations, I suspect Clusmy is sided with the mafia.

99% sure this is a bus

Randomnamechange · Post Post #2660 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:00 am

hard busses implies vecna town

drealmerz7 · Post Post #2661 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:02 am

it definitely seems to me like gerry saw clumsy possibly getting lynched D1 (he was one of the 1st players that got a significant push/wagon potential) and was like "yeah I'll hop on that bus!!!" and has been prepared to do so ever since

MB is giving me a good amount of pings too

but these lurkers, I was thinking they'd come back around given that the first 2 Days were blehhhhhhh and then it was the weekend when D3 started, but, at this point, wtf is with these lurkers?

KidAmn · Post Post #2662 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:06 am

In post 2661, drealmerz7 wrote:it definitely seems to me like gerry saw clumsy possibly getting lynched D1 (he was one of the 1st players that got a significant push/wagon potential) and was like "yeah I'll hop on that bus!!!" and has been prepared to do so ever since

MB is giving me a good amount of pings too

but these lurkers, I was thinking they'd come back around given that the first 2 Days were blehhhhhhh and then it was the weekend when D3 started, but, at this point, wtf is with these lurkers?

BTD is on a previously stated V/LA (but has posted almost nothing of value at all) and Pepto... I need to take another look at Pepto.

drealmerz7 · Post Post #2663 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:19 am

I also consider momo, the bulge, and zachstralkita to be lurkers

Randomnamechange · Post Post #2664 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:24 am

KidAmn · Post Post #2665 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:36 am

I agree, especially with Momo as I've pointed out, but don't want to get overly caught up in "omg lurkers must b sxumzzz!!!!1!" because that way lies madness/activity as a tell which is usually minimal

Randomnamechange · Post Post #2666 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:37 am

In post 2665, KidAmn wrote:I agree, especially with Momo as I've pointed out, but don't want to get overly caught up in "omg lurkers must b sxumzzz!!!!1!" because that way lies madness/activity as a tell which is usually minimal

yep. but im worried with anymore ml's we have to risk a shot at them which is hard to get right

KidAmn · Post Post #2667 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:50 am

In post 2666, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 2665, KidAmn wrote:I agree, especially with Momo as I've pointed out, but don't want to get overly caught up in "omg lurkers must b sxumzzz!!!!1!" because that way lies madness/activity as a tell which is usually minimal
yep. but im worried with anymore ml's we have to risk a shot at them which is hard to get right

Easier to do good scumhunting than take a pop in the dark tbh, the Clumsy lynch is A++ but there's no need to rush it.

momo · Post Post #2668 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:57 am

I guess I have been lurking a bit. I have math, gerry, and clumsy as scum.

I will be more than happy to vote clumsy but don't want a lynch just yet.

As for math, I did not mean to offend you but mafia is a heated game. If you can not take it replace out. As a neutral replacement, I can tell that you are not happy in this game. Don't pick fights. Whatever kid said. It was just words. Words on a computer screen should not get you this mad.

Everyone, the above is why I scum read math. At first I believed him but now it has gotten fake.

KidAmn · Post Post #2669 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:58 am

In post 2668, momo wrote:I guess I have been lurking a bit. I have math, gerry, and clumsy as scum.

I will be more than happy to vote clumsy but don't want a lynch just yet.

As for math, I did not mean to offend you but mafia is a heated game. If you can not take it replace out. As a neutral replacement, I can tell that you are not happy in this game. Don't pick fights. Whatever kid said. It was just words. Words on a computer screen should not get you this mad.

Everyone, the above is why I scum read math. At first I believed him but now it has gotten fake.

Do you have any original thoughts whatsoever, or is this just what you do?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #2670 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 11:00 am

for me D3 is the day to start killing lurkers, any longer and you risk them making it too close to lylo for comfort to play the end of the game in a healthy way

games around here don't have enough vigs!

momo · Post Post #2671 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 11:04 am

I also scum read random.....

Zachstralkita · Post Post #2672 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 11:08 am

I'm not really lurking. there's nothing I need to contribute. We're just doing today what should have originally been done yesterday.

The Bulge · Post Post #2673 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 11:32 am

In post 2653, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 2651, The Bulge wrote:
In post 2650, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 2648, KidAmn wrote:The only thing making me doubt Clumsy/Mathblade is how many lurkers we have who might just be letting us get distracted by Mathblade.
this is my issue. im worried that scum are lurking to victory
Does anyone strike you as actively lurking tho?
not particularly. thats why i said lurking and not active lurking.

Lurking strategically like you suggested is active lurking

In post 2663, drealmerz7 wrote:I also consider momo, the bulge, and zachstralkita to be lurkers

Ive never been a heavy poster. I always lurk. I was trying to play this game a little more actively, but i dont have as much spare time as i did right before i /inned

MathBlade · Post Post #2674 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 11:42 am

In post 2668, momo wrote:I guess I have been lurking a bit. I have math, gerry, and clumsy as scum.

I will be more than happy to vote clumsy but don't want a lynch just yet.

As for math, I did not mean to offend you but mafia is a heated game. If you can not take it replace out. As a neutral replacement, I can tell that you are not happy in this game. Don't pick fights. Whatever kid said. It was just words. Words on a computer screen should not get you this mad.

Everyone, the above is why I scum read math. At first I believed him but now it has gotten fake.

This is scum not Kid.

Bulge Momo Clumsy.