So farside asks why I find AC scummy despite including my abbreviated reasoning (provided to TeaBiscuit) in the same post she is quoting.
In short...POE (removing people I think are town from consideration), gut.....based on......things AC did in the game that I comment on in my catch up posts.
Since tomorrow is deadline and I am the leading wagon (L-2)....as much as I have better things to do than make a D1 case in a 50+ page game....here t'is:
In my read through there were several things AC did that I did not like (i.e. found suspec t).
First...
they claim VT when there is absolutely no reason to. They are not under any serious pressure...they only have 1 vote on them at the time, and the reason they give is because they know they won't be able to get anything past TWC....who isn't even voting them. (Not sure if suspicions of AC had been voiced or not).
So #1...unneccessary claiming.
Second... ...
he uses his claim as a justification for not being lynched D1. Which is rubbish as given a hypothetical situation with two equally suspect individuals whose claims I do not believe...I'd opt for the VT lynch over an unknown or PR claim, as if wrong...I've only lost a VT. So
#2...using the claim as a reason to not be lynched.
Third...
Pleading for people to vote them felt disingenuine. It felt like they were showing how they do not care if they are lynched to prove their towniness. But then they follow up their plead with the survivalist caveat to
pause at L-2 to let the day go on longer. LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH US but pleasse wait before you actually do.
#3...false attitude towards being lynched.
Fourth...
So the VT claim was fake...or not. I hate when people get cute and do shit to obfuscate the truth. Now...even if they WERE town...they have introduced enough doubt to potentially draw the attention of legit town PRs. Which if they ARE town is a waste of those players abilities. And if they ARE town...scum already knows it and has no reason to do anything but leave them in the game to cause doubt. So
#4...hedging on their VT claim.
Might have been fake/i.e. a lie or might not. BS. And the TWC hydra calls AC quite harshly for this "gambit" but never acts on their criticism of AC with a vote.
Fifth... Their response to a
question by infinity made absolutely no sense. Like they were just answering the question to answer it. So
Sixth...they give out two non-lurking related reasons for suspecting ThinkMomo. TM's comments in
216 about noticing Almost's play being "TOO casual". This when they did in fact have at least one game together. So it would be possible to have a feel for someone to some degree. And TM's
218 about post flip analysis. HTF is that scummy? Saying you will be doing post flip analysis? Everyone will I would hope. Because he didn't say what an AC scum flip would indicate to him (at such a relatively early stage in D1) doesn't make him scum. smh... The bulk of AC's push on TM IMO is predominantlly based on TM's lurking despite claims otherwise.
#6...a baseless push on a lynchbait lurker.
Seven...the drealm wagon wasn't going anywhere so the "I suppose voting TM wouldn't hurt anything"
slide onto a defenseless wagon for the above mentioned poor reasonings.
#7...picking on the weak.
Note...in
887 AC laments the lurkers a bit and sends a message to Pine that replacing out is ok. I do not recall the same suggestion being made to any of the other lurkers. Also of note...Pine did get replaced by fellow scum suspect Cloud. Convenient. Get that dead scum buddy slot replaced so it won't drag the team down. Got it. Don't push the other lurkers to replace out to make town stronger through....right AC?
And
the real reason for the continued AC vote on the Thinkmomo slot is highlighted once again. Lurking....but then laughably
AC says activity is NOT the reason they're scumreading TM and in the same sentence point out momo's activity in other games.
#8 Blatent contraditions
Not only is my slot s100% lockscum...I'm obviously a powerful PR because my scum buddies is "trying their best to save me." Which at last listing by AC...
my scumbuddies are TeaBiscuit and nancy/farside. Neither of whom, sadly, have done anything I can see to indicate they would not be bothered by my lynch. As evidenced by TeaBiscuit actually VOTING me and farside saying she'd prefer my lynch to AC's (WTF!!??).
I could have probably found a 10th reason but it's D1. I have rl and other games to attend to. But that's basically my reasoning farside (et al).
Wraith...if you are voting my slot based on activity...please vote elsewhere. I will be active and I won't replace out.
TeaBiscuit and infinity...if you have questions about my slot I'm available to discuss. Not a big fan of people I lean town on voting me and would prefer you vote elsewhere. What can I do to make that happen?
If I do wind up being today's lynch I would advocate AC's lynch tomorrow for the reasons above. At the very least...all the VT claim BS makes them untenable for LYLO.