Okay, my initial plan to review each player proves to be no easier than my standard notes method. So I will do this in 10 page blocks.
Page 1
Randomness
Page 2
More randomness. I agree with Yosarian2 about Panzer being wrong about a pg 1 serious vote being suspect.
Page 3
Yos thinks viper's vote for BM is a scumtell in that it is seeking an easy lynch; I'm a bit skeptical of this since a random wagon on BM is no worse than anywhere else. ABR is characteristically convinced that Peers is buddying in a scummy way; I'm not. Interesting that Kscope says "we need a BM wagon" - I don't recall him giving any reasons why BM is a better candidate. Kscope rightly gets suspected for this. Peers makes a really dodgy explanation of the random stage and gets attacked again.
Page 4
TS comes down rather hard on Viper, whom he accuses of panicking but who just asked why he was voted. Yos raises an interesting apparent contradiction from hasd who says he likes voting for reasons, but then mindlessly wagons. Hasd, as Panzer says, just plagiarises what has already been said. Fair enough that he might actually just agree, but this is a little eyebrow-raising.
Page 5
Confusing votes with no explanations
Page 6
Sikario moves to attack hasd, still not discussing his own play. Quagmire appears and says nothing has appeared so far. I don't like Sikario explaining his vote as a joke...it seemed serious.
Page 7
Sikario continues playing in a frustrating fashion. Hasd seems to think this resembles his town play meta. ABR pressures Peers to vote sik and says if he doesn't and Sik is scum, he will vote Peers - I've seen this style of play from ABR before but I don't think it is helpful. Erg0's vote for Peers is more sensible than ABR's brash attacks. Same with Yosarian - Peers looks like his priority is survival.
Page 8
TS explains why Sik's non-flaking is a possible town-tell. Peers' suspicions are poor and TS attacks them thoroughly. ABR explains himself a bit clearer. Peers gets worse.
Page 9
Zu emerges from lurkerness to echo the attacks on one of Peers' worst posts; looks like he is swaying with consensus. I don't agree with BM's vote for TS - in that his theory about her unvote is too speculative. Peers gets worse by buddying off to every person not voting him.
Page 10
MoS casts a vote for TS for her not contributing, which TS makes look really ironic given MoS's measly effort.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Right. At this stage of things I really don't like Peers. The differences in activity between players are a cause for some concern. ABR and BM are playing as they always do and I don't have much of a read on either of them. I think the case on TS is overrated and it's odd MoS would cast such a dodgy vote.
