[Game Over] Newbie 1784 - Escape Room

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:13 pm

In post 1753, Alisae wrote:
In post 1751, StealthyNoodle wrote:Alisae, you doc? I want that perfect town win.
Okay.
Why would you EVER say this outloud? I'm not going to give you an answer, but what makes you think it is perfectly acceptable to ask this outloud. If a BP exist, a doc shouldn't be possible.

Ugh, this is why I wish we had kept Loopdan.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:15 pm

In post 1752, WhyMafia wrote:
Remind me -
Why are you so convinced that nancy is scum?

I'm pretty certain she's isn't. But all my earlier reads on her says differently. I don't see any reason to explain; if Alisae doesn't claim, nancy is town for sure.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:16 pm

There's a whole lot of assumptions here. No dialogue.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:23 pm

In post 1764, nancy wrote:How in the fuck could you prefer a useless lurksack to Aslan, exactly?

Loopdan might've been a lurk, but he'd likely respond to my question in a regular way (and likely understand why I ask while we're at it) instead of going full nutsack armageddon in response.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:24 pm

So you claim doc then? Then I guess it's decided.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:26 pm

Sure, take your time and explain why.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:30 pm

In post 1781, Alisae wrote: pedit2: No. nancy does not have to explain anything.

Heh, so much for a newbie-game.
VOTE: nancy

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:49 pm

In post 1789, Chronicle wrote:
In post 1783, nancy wrote:Loopdan was heavily softing Doctor
I did not see this though.

He was about the only one suspicious of nancy, even after her BP claim. He also mentioned that he wouldn't claim doc even if it was to counterclaim.

By claiming BP nancy easily baited out a doc counterclaim. Most of us agreed that doc should cc if he was existent. If someone HAD claimed doc, scum would have both tracker and doc in their palm. It's a risk not worth taking in a newbie-game and it reads as scum.

Her doing a nokill now, was about the only move that could clear her of suspicion. Taking out anyone but the tracker would instantly reveal her as scum.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:00 pm

What I've learned from this game, is that these terms are misused a whole lot.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:06 pm

In post 1807, BlackVoid wrote:This is really frustrating. @nancy, after everything you said about wanting to teach newbies to play properly, fake-claiming a PR as a VT when you were widely suspected isn't something I can agree with.

Thank you. Feels like you're the only one who read my post.

In post 1807, BlackVoid wrote:If Alisae is fake-claiming doc as VT here, that's pretty suboptimal as well. You are not executing a brilliant plan to wifom scum. You are only adding noise and distractions to the game and making it more difficult to scumhunt. I just can't get behind someone replacing into a newbie game and fake-claiming their role which was why I said I missed Loopdan.

If Alisae was fake-claiming, she just gave away her chance of scum-victory. I also doubt it, considering Loopdan's doc softclaim.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:10 pm

Well, feels like you're messing up this newbie-game pretty well.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:13 pm

You clearly haven't read the thread.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:14 pm

In post 1819, nancy wrote:pedit sorry you feel that way Noodle.

Thank you.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:18 pm

Sure.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:38 pm

^I agree with what BlackVoid said. Alisae, it doesn't feel like you read the thread at all.
You assume your strat is pushing town towards a win, while all it really does is add a lot of confusion to an already messy newbie-game.
I'll take your latest VT-claim as the real one, and assume nancy is what she says she is.
UNVOTE: nancy

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:57 pm

Well, I'm starting to lose interest. Sucks.
VOTE: Srceenplay

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:04 pm

^@nancy There has been no real counterclaim, so I'm not tunneling you anymore. I spent hours trying to wrap my newbie-brain around that messy fake-claim, and if it's autowin, I don't really care anymore.

I'll pretty much go with whatever nancy and BV agrees upon.
Also, my townreads on WhyMafia are stronger than those on Srceenplay.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:16 pm

^@nancy I already suspected Loopdan to be doc. If he had counterclaimed, I'd see no reason not to lynch you;
You're too experienced to play a gambit that gives away both doc and tracker in a newbie-game, and you probably wouldn't take the risk of being counterclaimed as town.

In post 1397, nancy wrote:
In post 1385, StealthyNoodle wrote:footnote: I did enjoy that postmortem(pun not intended), last-gasp attempt to make the bus look real. Concidering it came arond after hammer went down, it pretty much cleared me more than it hurt me.
Oh sorry I didn't read this before. The point of calling you conf!scum btw was that if you /were/ scum then you'd be more likely to put in the kill for a tracker guilty today. Kind of a nancy play, don't try to make sense of it too much.

Oh my fault, I was referring to Drixx. I see now that I should've mentioned that.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:52 pm

In post 1873, nancy wrote:
In post 1871, Chronicle wrote:I just wanted to try to get him to play the game in a better way. The push was completely valid and he needed to see that the way he was playing needed to improve.

In post 682, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 676, nancy wrote:How have I always been the more suspicious one? What do you mean when you say I try to repel a lot of decent scumreads? What unstable reads are you referring to? I wasn't really defending anything, I was just correcting src's misconception.
You're simply
repeating my post, only with questionmarks
. Like you did back when we first started arguing. (Post 100). It's a
great method to make people less interested
to get involved.

@nancy Well in retrospect, for me this still holds true. A polyad of question is not dialogue in my eyes, and it killed every wish I had to engage with you any further.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:52 pm

In post 1897, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 1873, nancy wrote:
In post 1871, Chronicle wrote:I just wanted to try to get him to play the game in a better way. The push was completely valid and he needed to see that the way he was playing needed to improve.

In post 682, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 676, nancy wrote:How have I always been the more suspicious one? What do you mean when you say I try to repel a lot of decent scumreads? What unstable reads are you referring to? I wasn't really defending anything, I was just correcting src's misconception.
You're simply
repeating my post, only with questionmarks
. Like you did back when we first started arguing. (Post 100). It's a
great method to make people less interested
to get involved.
@nancy Well in retrospect, for me this still holds true. A polyad of questions is not dialogue in my eyes, and it killed every wish I had to engage with you any further.

Edit*

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:58 pm

Well Loopdan\Alisae is still town on my list. Alisae's failed gambit makes him even more so.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:06 pm

In post 1905, nancy wrote:Noted.

Allright, likewise then. Water under the bridge.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:05 pm

In post 1943, Alisae wrote:And Pine has a reputation for not bussing. So Noodle is probably town.

Even in his grave, Pine gets away with all the credit. So annoyed rn.

In post 1945, TesXX wrote:The only way we can lose at this point is if Noodle is scum.

No pressure.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:11 pm

^I'm all for the teachings and refuse to claim either way.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:12 pm

Excuse my rudeness

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:15 pm

Ohh woe unto me

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:27 pm

In post 1971, Alisae wrote:I like WhyMafia, but the slot has done a few thing that might have been a red flag.

A bunch of them, to be honest.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:30 pm

In post 1973, nancy wrote:Noodle claimed scum lol.

This is you bringing your "royal fuckover" back from the dead, isn't it??

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:33 pm

In post 314, nancy wrote:royally fuck over a newbie like I do right now with Noodle

In post 732, nancy wrote:I am currently royally fucking you over

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:36 pm

^@nancy nvm, it was supposed to be a joke. It's very dead now.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:39 pm

Seemed like you made a joke about me claiming scum. Guess it wasn't, then.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:41 pm

In post 1995, nancy wrote:No lol, explain what in world was going through your head when you made that post

Seriously?

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:53 pm

In post 1958, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 1943, Alisae wrote:And Pine has a reputation for not bussing. So Noodle is probably town.
Even in his grave, Pine gets away with all the credit. So annoyed rn.

You and Drixx were pretty the only ones scumreading me(you claim to believe I was 98% town yourself).
Thus, I feel confident I've done my best to prove myself as town.
After Drixx's lynch, you keep giving me town credibility because of Pine's anti-bus views.
I'm "annoyed" that you use

that

as your main argument.

In post 1958, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 1945, TesXX wrote:The only way we can lose at this point is if Noodle is scum.
No pressure.

If this gets to LyLo and I can't defend my credibility, we pretty much lose this game because of me.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:56 pm

Funny how you managed to decipher that as me being annoyed about Pine getting all the creds for us bussing eachother.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:56 pm

This sick power play of yours.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:58 pm

In post 2009, nancy wrote:that is a kinda standard way to give your scumbud towncred, like, why would he be pushing a bus if he's on the chopping block

Again, with this nonsense reverse psychology. It's not gonna get you anywhere.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 6:01 pm

^@nancy and sometimes the wine is clearly poisoned. I prefer to stick with that.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 6:02 pm

Wait, I prefer to NOT stick with that.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 16, 2017 6:02 pm

*dead*

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 8:29 am

@WhyMafia, I think my townreads on you are pretty fine, but you've been doing a lot of shady stuff as well.

In post 1659, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 1637, BlackVoid wrote:What's notable here is when he was accused of defending Pine, he jumps to say that he was defended another slot as well.
I like this observation as well. Here's some further investigation.

Deerstalker OnActually, I did take note of post 176 (which is his only defense of Cog, as mentioned in 463). And something was off about it: I remember being a bit annoyed because he pretty much spewed out the same non-sense as Chronicle:
In post 178, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 173, Chronicle wrote: Your vote is
wasted on a slot
that hasn't even
logged in since the game started
, and you voting him will not pop him an email telling him to check in on this game and post his thoughts.

And when he does finally catch up, he will post his thoughts accordingly. Your one vote doesn't do anything. It will not spur any sort of reaction, it does not give him any sort of incentive to pay more attention to this game, because he is not ignoring this game. Because he hasn't even logged in yet.

Your vote does not do anything. His inactivity thus far is not alignment indicative.
It doesn't seem like you're reading my posts at all. So let me rephrase:
If bjc0303 is lurking, he sees this. If there's more pressure and he's still lurking, there'll probably be a response as well. To explain further:
He doesn't have to be online to lurk.
I don't get why you keep pushing such an invalid argument.

In post 176, WhyMafia wrote:Why are we debating his alignment when he's not even lurking - he hasn't
logged on since the game started
. This is
wasting time to find scum
, unless we're using this to gauge reactions.

But idk I'm bad at mafia
And that goes for you as well.

I've included WhyMafia's whole post 176 in this quote. Had to alter it in order to get my point across.

This was his
only defense
of bjc(the one Cog replaced), and it's pretty much Chron's words, rearranged.

Care to explain why your post is so similar to Chronicle's?

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 8:31 am

In post 2129, StealthyNoodle wrote:@WhyMafia, I think my townreads on you are pretty fine, but you've been doing a lot of shady stuff as well.

In post 1659, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 1637, BlackVoid wrote:What's notable here is when he was accused of defending Pine, he jumps to say that he was defended another slot as well.
I like this observation as well. Here's some further investigation.

Deerstalker OnActually, I did take note of post 176 (which is his only defense of Cog, as mentioned in 463). And something was off about it: I remember being a bit annoyed because he pretty much spewed out the same non-sense as Chronicle:
In post 178, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 173, Chronicle wrote: Your vote is
wasted on a slot
that hasn't even
logged in since the game started
, and you voting him will not pop him an email telling him to check in on this game and post his thoughts.

And when he does finally catch up, he will post his thoughts accordingly. Your one vote doesn't do anything. It will not spur any sort of reaction, it does not give him any sort of incentive to pay more attention to this game, because he is not ignoring this game. Because he hasn't even logged in yet.

Your vote does not do anything. His inactivity thus far is not
alignment
indicative.
It doesn't seem like you're reading my posts at all. So let me rephrase:
If bjc0303 is lurking, he sees this. If there's more pressure and he's still lurking, there'll probably be a response as well. To explain further:
He doesn't have to be online to lurk.
I don't get why you keep pushing such an invalid argument.

In post 176, WhyMafia wrote:Why are we debating his
alignment
when he's not even lurking - he hasn't
logged on since the game started
. This is
wasting time to find scum
, unless we're using this to gauge reactions.

But idk I'm bad at mafia
And that goes for you as well.

I've included WhyMafia's whole post 176 in this quote. Had to alter it in order to get my point across.

This was his
only defense
of bjc(the one Cog replaced), and it's pretty much Chron's words, rearranged.
Care to explain why your post is so similar to Chronicle's?

*Edit

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 8:40 am

^@Srceen I mostly agree

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 8:56 am

In post 1888, Srceenplay wrote:
In post 1864, nancy wrote:Srceenplay were you scum?
Nope

Did you know that there was no hammer, when you responded to this?

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:59 am

In post 2142, WhyMafia wrote:Ok caught up completely. I'm completely disturbed by Srceen. He has literally sheeped town leaders

THE WHOLE GAME

????
VOTE: SrceenPlay
Nancy changed her vote, and Alisae voted him, so that makes it L-1

I'm fine with a lynch on me if it means we win. Go ahead.

Hmm, this is the second time you've avoided to respond to my post.
VOTE: WhyMafia

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:02 pm

In post 2168, TesXX wrote:
In post 2167, nancy wrote:TesXX no one honestly cares about perfect wins in newbies.
I do.

Well, seconded.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:07 pm

In post 2152, nancy wrote:YOU ARE NOT BEING SURVIVALISTIC RIGHT NOW YOU ARE JUST WASTING OUR TIME

YOU ARE 100% DEAD

YOU. ARE. NOT. GOING. TO. SURVIVE.

NO ONE IS GOING TO BE IMPRESSED THAT YOU SLOWROLLED

IT IS FUCKING RUDE

PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD CAN THIS JUST BE OVER

Ah, this abusive I'M-GONNA-SCREAM-AT-YOU-TILL-YOU-SURRENDER nonsense.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:12 pm

In post 2173, nancy wrote:If you want to play without any emotion Noodle that's totally fine and totally up to you.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:16 pm

In post 2171, nancy wrote:Caring about getting perfect wins will just paralyze your play because you'll be so focused on results that you'll neglect the process

Wrong, but oh well.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:18 pm

BlackVoid, thoughts on WhyMafia not responding to our scumreads on him?

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:26 pm

^Okay, I'm townreading Ali. She seemed upset after being scolded for fake-claiming doc. Looks genuine to me.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:29 pm

In post 2178, nancy wrote:What makes you say that?

It just didn't make any sense, sorry.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:33 pm

^I agree it applies in sports. Not at all here.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:40 pm

Achieving a perfect town-win, isn't really obtainable in any other game than a newbie one.
It's a great incentive for digging into all the small details.
Assuming autowin is risky and lazy. You can already see that there are several player's who don't believe win is secured.

Let's just disagree.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:56 pm

^What @Blackvoid said. It's an obtainable achievement. And as opposed to certain sports, we don't make a sacrifice by trying to achieve a great result.

pedit: You believe we'll be too burned out to work towards a regular win, if we don't achieve a perfect one? Your arguments just keep getting weaker tbh.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:57 pm

In post 2190, nancy wrote:If you and Chronicle are Town, we are 100% in autowin.

If you are scum that's 100% autowin... It doesn't work like that.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:59 pm

I don't trust Chronicle. Several players don't acknowledge me as town. You gotta take other's views into consideration.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:07 pm

In post 2193, TesXX wrote:It's technically not possible in every game to have a perfect win, but they're possible in many.

Well, maybe. There's always a possibility.

Mafiascum Wiki wrote:Town very rarely achieve a Perfect Win, though it has happened in certain Newbie Games.

pedit: @nancy

pedit2: @nancy
Huh? When?

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:11 pm

In post 2202, BlackVoid wrote:
In post 2196, StealthyNoodle wrote:I don't trust Chronicle. Several players don't acknowledge me as town. You gotta take other's views into consideration.
Why don't you trust Chronicle?

He reads more town than scum. I just don't see why he's locktown(if that's even the right term).

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:12 pm

In post 2206, TesXX wrote:Some setups don't have any protecting roles to stop at least one townie from dying.

Oh, I see.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:15 pm

In post 2205, nancy wrote:Like, you two have been hard buddying each other all game

Not at all. Did you see my readlist?
Chronicle is dope, but I don't see a whole bunch of reasons to trust him enough for a autowin.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:17 pm

In post 2209, TesXX wrote:But you said that you don't trust him.

In context of agreeing upon whether this game is autowin or not.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:18 pm

^@nancy Right, thanks. Well, he's certainly not locktown to me. Please refer me to reads, if you believe me to be blind.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:44 pm

So you were just copying his arguments then? They're pretty much the same.
That single copypasta-post is pretty much your excuse for defending Pine.

In post 1637, BlackVoid wrote:Before I forget, this post has been bothering me for a while and is just an overall weird post:
In post 463, WhyMafia wrote:Regarding Stealthy's post, I was only defending Pine bc lynching someone based on someone who is inactive is ridiculous.
I also defended the person Cog replaced
(albeit less so bc I was busy when they were trying to lynch him)
What's notable here is when he was accused of defending Pine, he jumps to say that he was defended another slot as well. Feels like he knows Pine is scum and is saying "oh, it isn't just Pine I defended, look I defended this townie as well."

I remember taking note of you actually doing research on Pine's posting.

In post 461, StealthyNoodle wrote:In this post he "corrected" TesXX' response to nancy, by stating that Pine only made 4 posts that were game-related, which means he actually went back to check.
Unless he and Pine are scumbuddies, I see it as potential scumhunting.

I still think this holds true. Now that we know that Pine was scum, it could just as well be you finding a good defense for him.
In Pine's case, you went back and found reasonable defense.
In bjc's case, you copied Chronicle's defense, and pretty much made it your own.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:55 pm

In post 2216, WhyMafia wrote:Because I agree with it. It's a fact. He didn't log on ..

What bothers me the most, is that it seems like you try to make it your own post.

In post 176, WhyMafia wrote:Why are we debating his alignment

You ask why we're discussing his

alignment

. Chronicle used this word right before you and you haven't used it ever since. The fact that you ask, means you didn't even read through the discussion. But you had the time to copy Chronicle.

In post 176, WhyMafia wrote:he hasn't logged on since the game started.

Why would you mention this again, when Chronicle just mentioned it? (in almost exact wording while we're at it)
Why not just state that you agree with Chronicle?

In post 176, WhyMafia wrote:This is
wasting time to find scum
, unless we're using this to gauge reactions.

Again,

Chronicle's words

.

tl;dr
It doesn't look like you're interested in defending bjc.
It looks like you're trying act town by assisting his defense, and do so by

posing someone else's research as your own

.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:16 pm

In post 2220, nancy wrote:Noodle do me a favor and go through Chronicle's ISO and tell me what you think about the associatives in there?

I suppose that means his interactions with Drixx\Pine? I mean, he largely reads as town in regards to their conversations.
I'll try to read more into it tomorrow though. Gotta head to bed.

StealthyNoodle · Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:22 pm

HEY!

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:15 am

In post 2235, Alisae wrote:You honestly have no right saying this to nancy or an SE player with your play this game. Just saying.

Not sure what you're trying to achieve, but I'm sure we all would love to hear more about it.

In post 2267, Alisae wrote:btw, Noodle's whole push on WhyMafia is all based on semantics and is ultimately NAI and shit.

So, do you have an agenda here? Or are you simply trying to put on a show? It's not very entertaining tbh.

In post 2268, Alisae wrote:Like, Occam's Razor just suggests that the word choice was unconscious and unintentional.

Oh, also you're wrong. But oh well.

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:18 am

In post 2263, WhyMafia wrote:Well my apologies for the "copying"

No worries, you're of the hook.

UNVOTE: WhyMafia

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:23 am

In post 2274, nancy wrote:We're waiting for Noodle to come in and case Chronicle.

It's gonna be a while. If you're in a hurry, please go ahead.
For now Chronicle looks townish to me.

I'll check in every now and then.

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:31 am

In post 1297, Srceenplay wrote:I'm brushing teeth and going to bed.
I think Drixx is at l-1 not sure though.
If nancy hasn't voted I'll wait and let her. If she has and no one else can hammer I will now.

I don't feel like this looks like bussing btw.

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:27 am

Chronicle, did you at any point heavily suspect anyone?

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:38 pm

Chronicle's Scummy SideWell, here are some of the posts that stick out.

In post 2086, Chronicle wrote:But then again, I'm not amazing at this game either. She is definitely better at reading people than I originally thought, which frustrates me somewhat because I thought I played a decent town game.

Putting your trust and praise in nancy's reads like this seems off. Especially after accusing her reads\gameplay for being bad at several occasions.

In post 327, Chronicle wrote:nancy, pine, whymafia

Preference of lynch in that order

In post 336, Chronicle wrote:I don't think a Pine lynch is the best lynch to do at the moment, though

In post 1081, Chronicle wrote:I see some dislike for Drixx on the Pine slot, but I feel like that's a metaread so I can't really get behind it.

In post 1076, Chronicle wrote:Src/Loop
Drixx/WM/Tess

Lynch preference from top to bottom, left to right are in no particular order.

Seems like you've been placing Pine/Drixx

somewhere in the middle

. A fine way to avoid lynch and avoid suspicion.

You're pretty much okay with lynching anyone but me and nancy.
You've barely suspected me for being scum at any point in the game. It doesn't look like you're the least suspicious of me.

Trust is usually hard when you're town, easier when you're scum.

I don't think Noodle is scum anymore.
Not sure if I really agree on that Noodle read, I like noodle for town.
Noodle and Cog are out of the question.[...]Also nancy/pine, still don't see Noodle being scum
Aye, the fact that they both sit on the Noodle wagon confuses me too. Doesn't make sense that they scumread Noodle,
Noodle is town.
Still waiting on that Noodle scumcase
And that read on Noodle.
but if you would to try, tell me why noodle is scum
That doesn't read at all like caught scum
but he doesn't have to be softing PR if he thinks he's playing obvtown
the few times he has said thanks to people who have commented that they townread him seems to me like he's pretty aware that he's playing just fine.[...]when has noodle had contradictions? i don't recall him calling someone town the whole game, and then suddenly call that person scum(ahem ahem).
i hate this post because of how much it misreps noodle.
in case it hasn't been clear enough[...]i think noodle is town
I still like Noodle for town. Honestly with all the scumreads on him I've tried to reevaluate this read but I can't convince myself he's scum, outside of his reaction to the nancy claim.

You also seem to use every occasion to state your townread of me. It's a fine "told-you-so", should I get lynched. But hey, I appreaciate it.

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:47 pm

^That being said, I still doubt that Chronicle went for a nokill. Scum taking a shot at tracker sounds way more likely.

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:59 pm

Well a nokill wouldn't cost him a lot, concidering he was likely going to be targeted by tracker. Meaning he'd nokill regardless of the second power role.
But yeah, there's really no saying which case is strongest imo.

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:03 pm

This might've been answered btw. But do we get a read from tracker if he's killed the same turn? I guess no?

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:17 pm

^Oh wow, well that explains a lot. Why did I even bother making a post on him then. I agree that it's highly unlikely such a play ever took place.

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:20 pm

In post 1398, nancy wrote:In case you're wondering why it's autowin btw, we have two Tracker clears by Day 3

No wonder i was confused. So this is basically you admitting to fake-claiming theb? From this I figured we'd get to know his result even though he was killed N2.

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:21 pm

In post 2320, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 1398, nancy wrote:In case you're wondering why it's autowin btw, we have two Tracker clears by Day 3
No wonder i was confused. So this is basically you admitting to fake-claiming then? From this I figured we'd get to know his result even though he was killed N2.

*Edit

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:27 pm

In post 2322, nancy wrote:your play this game has not been sufficiently good if you are Town to make that the case for everyone on the table.

I don't follow. Rephrase.

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:36 pm

Well, you should've explained why he was locktown and made me read someone else. What a waste of time.

StealthyNoodle · Tue Apr 18, 2017 3:02 pm

I'd say he's pretty locktown?
His track didn't go anywhere. Him not taking a shot at tracker would mean he probably guessed you were fake claiming BP as doc, and that there was a chance of him being targeted by tracker, thus went with his guts and did a nokill gambit, instead of going for a well chosen kill. It sounds like a highly unlikely scenario.

I rather wish I spent time today doing actual scumreads, than useless reads on a pretty much locked town.

StealthyNoodle · Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:34 am

In post 2331, nancy wrote:The issue with this reasoning is that you're relying lazily on an intepretation of the NK rather than going through his ISO to determine whether or not you think he is a likely scumpartner.

In post 2340, nancy wrote:If he locks that slot as Town, he is literally guaranteed to win this game.

I've already stated that he looks largely townish, with the exception of a few scum reads. Now, the NK + track, obviously seals that.

StealthyNoodle · Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:06 pm

So, who's currently in the lynch-pool then? WhyMafia, Srceenplay, Alisae and TesXX?
Also lurkbump.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:41 pm

Srceenplay - wicked arguments, brute force and no mercy.

Whymafia - politeness, smooth talk and AtE.

Those are currently my candidates. WhyMafia the most.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:41 pm

And then there's Loopdan.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:46 pm

In post 2438, nancy wrote:Noodle is up next.

What?

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:00 pm

I did? It just looks like you're trying to get people to guess your readlist?

I don't really care for tassology like that.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:03 pm

In post 2443, Alisae wrote:
In post 2440, nancy wrote:@Aslan that isn't his read on you he's guessing my reads....
Oh okay.
@WhyMafia why do you think nancy may feel that way about me?

Why do you Alisae believe that WhyMafia says that he believes that nancy would feel that way about you?

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:05 pm

^my point exactly

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:09 pm

Well, you're still just proving my point.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:18 pm

How would his answer say

anything

about anyone at all?

Questions like why do

you

think

I

believe that

WhyMafia

reads scum, isn't gonna get you anywhere near a read.

You're practically forcing him to go through nancy's collection of weird reads, try to make some kinda sense out of them, and then explain why he thinks that some reads

maybe

made more sense than others.
Of course, most likely he's just wild guessing, like I would do if I felt obligated to answer some weird question like that.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:22 pm

@WhyMafia Do you have anyone you suspect besides Srceenplay?

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:37 pm

In post 2444, BlackVoid wrote:If we can agree on Alisae-town, that leaves me free to track someone scummier. His predecessor was one of the towniest slots in the game.

I agree. Loop was already pretty townside to me D1, and Ali's entrance D2 looked like spontaneous, fearless, careless town.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:41 pm

^rude

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:45 pm

^self-explanatory

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:51 pm

^so how come you assumed I was some teenager?

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:00 pm

In post 2467, nancy wrote:but if you were actually middle-aged it would explain a lot.

/thread

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:01 pm

It was self-explanatory. Let's move on.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:05 pm

In post 2474, BlackVoid wrote:So, here's where I'm currently at: Definitely town: Alisae. Probably town: Srceenplay, TesXX. I'm going to look over StealthyNoodle and WhyMafia again and hopefully Aristophanes will have caught up by then.

And your stance on Ari?

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:06 pm

[page 100]

I'm dead.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:18 pm

I've been scumreading Chronicle/Ari for most of the game. But after you tracked him, I find it unlikely that he suspected nancy for being doc,

while

assuming he'd be the next target for your track at the same time, thus doing a nokill gambit. It just sounds way more likely that scum believed nancy's BP claim and went for your kill.

I'm still pretty dead set on WhyMafia.

I also feel like TesXX could be scum (But you ppl keep saying he's probs town? Care to explain/link?)

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:19 pm

^Well not dead set. But he still feels scummy.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:20 pm

In post 2487, nancy wrote:WHAT THE FUCK YOU HAVE NOT BEEN SCUMREADING CHRONICLE EVER

Why do you have to be like this, nancy...?

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:30 pm

In post 2491, nancy wrote:I am not moving my vote ever.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:43 pm

In post 2501, Aristophanes wrote:Noodle, why don't you want to participate in this?

Read on, and you'll find the answers you seek

In post 2501, Aristophanes wrote:What's this about a track? I'm intrigued!

You were "cleared" tonight. Some of us assumed a tracker-kill, but it was likely stopped by doc. You were tracked by our tracker, and it led nowhere. You could be innocent, or you could've decided on a nokill gambit.

In post 2501, Aristophanes wrote: Also, by nancy's reply to this, I take it you never stated the scumread on me?
Why is that if you have believed it all game?

nancy's response made little to no sense. If you're curious about

how

wrong she was, I'll encourage you to go through my ISO and make your own conclusion.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:48 pm

^I'm pretty certain this would be against the rules. He linked it, but it got removed.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:49 pm

Looking forward to that moment when nancy's gonna pull her vote.

StealthyNoodle · Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:54 pm

I like this fellow already.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:31 am

In post 2528, BlackVoid wrote:@StealthyNoodle, can you explain your Pine vote in 633? Up until this point, you didn't seem to have much suspicion of Pine other than your "shredding Pine's wall" post.

Well I pretty much gave you a

gift-wrapped

Pine in the posts that followed.
(Ofc. nancy states that she's the one who carried that lynch)

In post 650, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 650, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 430, StealthyNoodle wrote:
Shredding Pine's Wallpost - Part 1[...]
I never got any response on this. Not sure if people just ignored it, but here starts my case on Pine.
For a Town IC, I don't like Pine's Wallpost at all. His arguments are simple and pretty pointless, a bunch of them are just rephrasings of other players' posts.

*Edit: Not sure what happened, but THIS is the correct post. Ignore the previous one.

In post 654, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 387, Pine wrote:
Page 1

-Post 17 (and subsequent posts) leads me to think nancy is Town.

Page 2

-Not much to observe here, nancy continues to come off as Town.

Page 3

-Pine enters, nancy interaction is pretty obvTown.

Page 4

-Stealthy's entrance looks like newScum [...] votes nancy as the most dynamic player present. [...] exaggerating charges against nancy.

Page 5

-A little concerned about LoopDan's push against non-claimers in the BP strategy. [...] Also not a fan of his dig at nancy about her statement about teaching>wincon[...] As a player new to SE-status, nancy is allowed to be wrong about meta.

Page 6

[...]TRs (Town reads) include nancy and Chronicle.

Page 11

-Noodle attacks on nancy continue to be trying to make something out of nothing.
-Tentatively agreeing with nancy 314, LoopDan looks like stubborn Town SE sticking to bad reads.
Pretty much brushes away every argument towards nancy as useless. Puts up an effort to make me look more scum with useless arguments. Might be tunneling, but concidering Pine's an IC with 11k+ posts and likely a lot of games behind him, I'd doubt it. Also, his reasoning should be way better than this! An experienced town player would at least take others' opinions and reads into consideration - Pine simply doesn't. He just brushes them away as "obvious" scumreads.

In post 659, StealthyNoodle wrote:
In post 387, Pine wrote:Taking down a Town IC and dynamic SE would virtually guarantee a scum win.
Not sure why this is mentioned by an IC at all. It's a bad argument to avoid getting lynched, and shouldn't be used if one were an experienced town-player.

I'd also like to think that Pine would've had more insight as an IC, than to tunnel me from beginning till end. Not
once
did he see any of my posts as slightly townish, and avoided mentioning the posts that weren't scummy enough. As town, I'm pretty sure he'd be more open to more views.

Now, can we vote Pine?

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 8:02 am

I still have 3 or 4 pages left to read, but I gotta say. The fact that some of you or so easily persuaded by nancy's shit-reads saddens me.
Not a single one of you even went back to see her reason for voting me was, and check whether she was right or wrong.
@Alisae You're just appearing more and more scummy from licking nancy's boots. Just like Chronicle did at one point.

I'll respond to your post about me later BlackVoid. For now, thanks for actually acknowledging my wallpost-read(your pretty much the only one who did); I truly appreciate it.
Also, regarding whether I played before: No - This is my first game except for playing in Meat World.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 8:22 am

In post 2745, StealthyNoodle wrote:I still have 3 or 4 pages left to read, but I gotta say. The fact that some of you are so easily persuaded by nancy's shit-reads saddens me.
Not a single one of you went back to look into her reason for voting me, and check whether she was right or wrong.
@Alisae You're just appearing more and more scummy from licking nancy's boots. Just like Chronicle did at one point.

I'll respond to your post about me later BlackVoid. For now, thanks for actually acknowledging my wallpost-read(your pretty much the only one who did); I truly appreciate it.
Also, regarding whether I played before: No - This is my first game except for playing in Meat World.

Edit*

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 12:11 pm

Catching Up - Part 1

In post 2585, BlackVoid wrote:I'm a little weirded out by the soft PR claim in 721 and I don't see why a newbie playing his first game would assume he won't get lynched.

Can you people stop calling this a soft-claim? You're excused for replacing, BlackVoid.
1. nancy was practically the only one scumreading me, besides Pine. Both their reads on me were pretty sad.
2. Several players already had me as town (or townread)
3. As I stated in post 731, narcy loves to think that this game revolves around her, that she's able to control the outcome of the game, arrange a lynch for whoever she likes, and that she's been the only one driving the game forward. I'm gonna enjoy

every

moment I get to aid her in realizing that her narcissistic lifestyle isn't doing anyone any good.
(which is why I'm excitedly looking forward to her revoking her locked vote on me, because she already knows I won't get lynched this time either. Sidenote: She's likely gonna pretend it was all a play to see whoever sheeped)

In post 2585, BlackVoid wrote:I also forgot to mention: Loopdan continuing to push nancy because he thought StealthyNoodle was a PR is a pretty big towntell.

narcy was acting scummy as heck and everyone thought there would be a counterclaim. Considering LoopDan(and me) was among the more suspicious ones, I suspected him for being doc waiting for D2 to cc.

In post 2597, nancy wrote:WhyMafia is Town because 2141 and
2494
,

In post 2494, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 2491, nancy wrote:I am not moving my vote ever.
Lynch srceen
Or lynch me
I'm fairly certain noodle is town. His activity + posts + tone seems good to me

It's the exact opposite? He's been acting like this several times now. "Lynch me, I don't care". If he was town, he'd likely realize we're not in autowin, and not "give up" that easily.
Thanks for kind words though, WhyMafia.

In post 2597, nancy wrote:Noodle is scum because his reads are fake, his push on Pine looks like a blatant bus and is the only actual scumhunting he's done all game and because Drixx's push on him looks like bussed!scum distancing.

You're trying. so. hard.

In post 2624, Alisae wrote:My only real reason to townread him is Pine voteparking there.

If this is the only townread you can come up with on me, then you're either scum or just a terribly lazy townsplayer. I'd love to have Loopdan back.

to be cont'd

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 12:49 pm

CATCHING UP - PART 2

In post 2558, Srceenplay wrote:You saying he knew she was doc before n1?

In post 2575, Srceenplay wrote:Thank you BV.
I will do that in morning 6-7 hours

GN for real now

Srceen is turning more and more town. The way he keeps conversing curiously.

In post 2595, Alisae wrote:try to explain to her why she's wrong?

Are you serious...?

In post 2595, Alisae wrote:litterally

9/10. I do respect correct usage of a commonly misused word though.

BlackVoid's Post 2599 is the kind of reasoning that's steadily moving us towards the perfect win.

In post 2602, BlackVoid wrote:2371 isn't a towntell because WhyMafia specifically said D1 that he offered himself to be lynched because no mafia would do it. Meaning he is expecting a death-wish to be read as town and for people to go "no way he says that as scum." He didn't say that expecting to be lynched, he said that expecting to be townread.

I didn't see this before now, but yeah I agree, as previously mentioned.

pedit: @WhyMafia I mean, for scum you respond pretty well. As town, I understand that there's little motivation to spend time defending past mistakes(I'll also add that I feel like you respond fairly well/seemingly honest when questioned. Both now and when confronted about the "copying", as well as in other situations).

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 12:50 pm

Catching up sucks btw.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:00 pm

In post 2613, Alisae wrote:Like, let's also add you ruined a great fucking moment of syncronization where me and nancy MUTUALLY agreed to role swap to try to bait a night kill to give you a night to actually clear someone.

And I'm talking OUT OF MY FUCKING ASS WHEN I AM TRYING TO ENCOURAGE TEAMWORK.

It was a terrible, terrible idea (not to mention how it just added a lot of confusion to the game), but it does makes you look like lazy town.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:09 pm

In post 2626, nancy wrote:Noodle was also not bussed so anything Pine did if Noodle is scum was only distancing.

Here's some more catch 22 content on how hard you're trying to verify your thoughts

If you need an excuse for unvoting btw, I'll help you out: Just state that you needed me to step up my locktown-game.

pedit: @Srceenplay I don't think so.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:25 pm

In post 2634, nancy wrote:
In post 2585, BlackVoid wrote:I also very much like 654 and 659.
I like 659 and it's the only post in his ISO that I think I genuinely like.

Just to assist you in your ongoing witchhunt, 659 isn't really that good.
Pine's quote in 659 can be read in two ways:
1. Could be read as him trying to defend his position as scum, by stating that IC and SE shouldn't be lynched.
2. Could be read as him accusing 3 players for trying to take down IC and SE, because it would technically guarantee scum win. (which is most likely in context tbh)

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:34 pm

In post 2638, nancy wrote:The fact that the only time Noodle has actually scumhunted or done anything all game came on a out-of-the-blue push on Pine which he quickly abandoned and never really followed up is not something I want to overlook.

i love seing you desperately trying to make up false "facts". If someone else agrees to this, I'll gladly self-hammer when I'm L-1.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:40 pm

@2639

Marry me, Holmes.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:48 pm

In post 2640, nancy wrote:Do you honestly believe this is not 100% fake?

I agree, it totally looks fake.

In post 2640, nancy wrote:This slot has been acting like an arrogant know-it-all the entire game

Nope, only when discussing with narcy. My response was directed towards Loopdan, if I remember correctly.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:00 pm

In post 2641, nancy wrote:This is where he re-votes Drixx after abandoning the push. It's pure bullshit.

This is where narcy takes shit out of context.

@BlackVoid If you wish for me to elaborate on specific statements, just say the word.
For now I'll just assume that this is nancy desperately searching her way through the tunnel.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:01 pm

In post 2642, Alisae wrote:He doesn't even add anything about why he's voting Drixx.

'___________________'

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:11 pm

2643: Again, thanks. Being alone in this one-man-shitstorm, defending the somewhat obvious, is exausting. I've already spent hours catching up today, responding to a lot of effortless bullcrap.

pedit: @BlackVoid I'm gonna head to bed soon. If there's one post in particular you'd like me to answer, just refer me to it. Not sure how long this catching up is gonna take.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:13 pm

@BlackVoid. I doubt it. But I'll try to respond whenever I can.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:21 pm

In post 2646, BlackVoid wrote:I had a distinct impression Noodle was trying to buddy me today.

I guess your thoughts on this hasn't changed after the catchup.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:08 pm

In post 2779, BlackVoid wrote:Just wanted to ask why you were being so antagonistic towards nancy. That doesn't seem much better than Alisae randomly going off on me. I'm reading you as town and would like that read to be right so I can narrow things down but I'm slightly weirded out that you agreed with pretty much everything I said and lashed out at nancy. That's in addition to agreeing with my push on WhyMafia at the beginning of D2.

Alisae is "randomly" going off on you, because she believe's she's right and you're wrong. You could probably explain to her why you think she's wrong, and she'd accept it if she sees your point.

narcy

on the other hand, is right about everything, and everyone but her is wrong. She's not interested in discussing, she's not interested in being proven wrong, she's not interested in teaching(yet she obliviously claims so).
She does love to make wild assumptions, sick exaggerations, with little to absolutely no backing. I'd seriously love to make a list for you at some point.
After experiencing this on close hold for a long time now, let it be said that it's annoying and exhausting like I can't tell you.

YOU

on the other hand, make stone-cold observations, elaborate on genuinely believable scum-thinking,

and

you consider people to be innocent as well as guilty. Maybe I give you extra cred because you're conf!town, but my devotion to your research is certainly not just buddying. More like a sigh of relief.

No one supported me when I stepped up against nancy (Well, there was Chronicle, papa bless), and after spending hours wasted(starting around 644, ending at beautiful 744), I had little motivation to ever engage with her again.
If someone else is about to experience that same seemingly effortless situation, I won't stand idly by.

Seeing nancy going all "disgust" over your investigation(like she does to everyone that doesn't approve of her ways) is one of those kinda situations.

pedit: @TesXX Probably true, and no I won't.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:17 pm

In post 2668, BlackVoid wrote:I looked through a scum-Loopdan game (Newbie 1751) and it pretty much destroyed my townread on the slot completely.

A ghost comes to you at night. He says -

In post 488, Loopdan wrote:I would warn against using meta (unless it's meta where you were in the game), but since some of you stalkers like digging into my past, here's a list:

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:28 pm

In post 2671, BlackVoid wrote:I'd like to know if Noodle actually pre-wrote that post and why. Did he mention this anywhere?

Yep, and I had no intention of hiding it. I actually had several versions ready, depending on the outcome (though they were pretty similar). I also had an alarm set, so I could be the first one out.
I was certain Drixx was about to turn town (considering his post-hammer posts), and thought I had a way of proving nancy (2nd in my lynchpool after Drixx) guilty or innocent. The theory wasn't really of that much use though, considering Drixx turned scum and no one ever counterclaimed.

StealthyNoodle · Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:29 pm

Okay, off to bed. Gn.

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 2:37 am

Ohh and I almost forgot - Happy birthday Pine.

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 2:37 am

^I think I would've loved playing with you as town

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 2:43 am

^Twas yesterday if I'm not mistaken. I was gonna congratulate him, but I forgot.

Why sheep Ari?

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 2:56 am

TesXX your act is as graceful as a gazelle

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:01 am

In post 2933, nancy wrote:I've been driving a ton of activity I guess.

@TesXX Tell me all about why he's confscum.

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:02 am

^Ohh that was supposed to go in a spoiler, but oh well. MDS, remove if you want.

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:10 am

^Oh wow, such win. Much read. I'll claim the hammer-vote then.

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:29 am

He's obv gonna get lynched now, thanks to narcy's hyperactive gamesolve-stalling play.

I'm gonna bring the hammer, don't worry.

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:52 pm

Pretty disappointing, but oh well. Wp!

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 7:53 pm

Extra creds to those of you who actually cared for the game from beginning to end. As WhyMafia stated, it's easy to lose motivation after playing for this long.

I dislike the way the game ended, but nevertheless, it's been a ride!

pedit:
Gotta agree with Srceenplay, it's a pretty bad way to play in a game with mostly new players.

StealthyNoodle · Sat Apr 22, 2017 8:07 pm

Last, but not least:
Thanks for hosting, MDS. Your storytelling-ability is seriously of another plane.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 23, 2017 2:11 am

@Regfan Thanks my dude. Feel free to share your thoughts.

@TesXX Gg man. Btw,
was there ever any hidden purpose to this? I'm still mad curious.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 23, 2017 4:40 am

^Cool. Are those threads official yet? Not sure how that stuff works.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 23, 2017 4:48 am

In post 3281, Alisae wrote:Wow you sound like you don't care -_-

I suppose there was some lack of enthusiasm. Appreciate it though.
Tbh, I think you played pretty well for replacing scum(which is why I dislike the white flag)
Mind linking me the dead-thread as well?

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 23, 2017 11:32 am

@Alisae Claiming doc soon after replacing was probably my strongest townread towards you. To me, you seemed like experienced town trying to pull of a tricky gambit before having read up on the thread. I figured scum would be more careful with attempting role-swaps like this, and probably read up before the switch, as to avoid traps.

In post 3291, BlackVoid wrote:After seeing how often towns lose by quicklynching, I really wanted to take our time exploring all possibilities.

This is exactly why I

loved

your play-style! Making theories, taking other's theories into consideration, sharing thoughts, putting them on display, filtering feedback.
And it looks like you actually spent some serious time reading through the thread. My dude,

well played

.

In post 3301, nancy wrote:Granted, I don't think anyone actually appreciated my mentorship except WhyMafia anyway, so I kind of feel like whatever I did didn't really matter to anyone.

Your playstyle was too Machiavellian for me to acknowledge your mentorship. I believe it doesn't go well together with teaching. Tbf though, trying to teach while accusing and being accused, can't exactly be easy either.
Nevertheless you played well, and I believe I learned a lot from playing

against

with you.

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 23, 2017 11:36 am

In post 3298, WhyMafia wrote:Thanks for putting up with me!

my townread of you - still true, it is

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 23, 2017 11:59 am

In post 49, MiniDeathStar wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 3064, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 3061, nancy wrote:Ari how is your townread on Aslan so strong o.O
We just get each other, you know!
Like, I had the worst but feel on Siblings Quarrel when he and Fro99er hydra'd and I never followed it! We were fantastic partners as town in See Neyn Ples Ples! We nice well and I got the townfeelz this game

Cracked me up.

Hhhhh reading the scum-thread just made the game so much more interesting.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on procedure in the end, Ali.

In post 3311, nancy wrote:Oh how I would love to sig that!

Please do vuv

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 23, 2017 12:31 pm

Lol, I'm getting Tekken-vibes.

Spoiler:

StealthyNoodle · Sun Apr 23, 2017 12:51 pm

In post 3313, mhsmith0 wrote:Brevity and sparseness is a hard thing to do sometimes, but in general I think it makes for a bit of a better game (certainly an easier one for people to follow, especially for replacements).

I believe the amount of posting has it's pros and cons:
It's easy to get

confused

and

lose motivation

when trying to catch up - and I believe many a player would step down their townplay in such a situation.
At the same time, more content means