Open 680.1 C9++ | Endgame

FireScreamer · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 4:56 pm

In post 448, CommKnight wrote:Well last game Frank and Momo were inactive (Blue Skies, Momo's replacement) is pretty townie and Frank is a lot more active than he was. So I'd like to think they're both town at this point, but will reassess as time goes on. Right now I am certain something is up between FS/Umlaut though.

Why is Brian townie? Define the something between me and Umlaut and describe why you think it is the case.

FireScreamer · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 4:57 pm

In post 449, Narna wrote:lynching based on false logic =/= townreading on false logice for d1.

Apples do not equal pears.

FireScreamer · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 4:58 pm

In post 451, FireScreamer wrote:
In post 449, Narna wrote:lynching based on false logic =/= townreading on false logice for d1.
Apples do not equal pears.

You know while we are listing useless comparisons

CommKnight · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 4:59 pm

@FS, where is yours and Umlaut's read list? Aside from myself and each other. Reasons why? I'm curious to see where you stand, if anywhere. No stalling either.

FireScreamer · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:02 pm

I'd rather reread the thread tomorrow before giving a considered full reads list.

Scum leans - You, Umlaut, Brian

Town leans Alchemist, GC, Dave

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:06 pm

Why do you scumread Brian?

Narna · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:07 pm

In post 451, FireScreamer wrote:
In post 449, Narna wrote:lynching based on false logic =/= townreading on false logice for d1.
Apples do not equal pears.

TThat is my point,no ?

FireScreamer · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:10 pm

In post 456, Narna wrote:
In post 451, FireScreamer wrote:
In post 449, Narna wrote:lynching based on false logic =/= townreading on false logice for d1.
Apples do not equal pears.
TThat is my point,no ?

And mine was that both are equally irellevant to the argument. I don't care if X does not equal y if both X and y are bad

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:12 pm

In post 457, FireScreamer wrote:
In post 456, Narna wrote:
In post 451, FireScreamer wrote:
In post 449, Narna wrote:lynching based on false logic =/= townreading on false logice for d1.
Apples do not equal pears.
TThat is my point,no ?
And mine was that both are equally irellevant to the argument. I don't care if X does not equal y if both X and y are bad

Elaborate.

FireScreamer · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:14 pm

In post 455, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why do you scumread Brian?

His read on GC doesn't seem to make a lot of sense outside of him white knighting for me.

He seemed frustrated by my actions being able to get me successfully townread while never actually making arguments as to why anything I was doing was scummy. Just unfair.

FireScreamer · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:16 pm

In post 458, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 457, FireScreamer wrote:
In post 456, Narna wrote:
In post 451, FireScreamer wrote:
In post 449, Narna wrote:lynching based on false logic =/= townreading on false logice for d1.
Apples do not equal pears.
TThat is my point,no ?
And mine was that both are equally irellevant to the argument. I don't care if X does not equal y if both X and y are bad
Elaborate.

Even if I were to accept that lynching on false logic isn't the same as townreading due to false logic why does that matter? Both are anti town behaviours which should be spoken out against.

CommKnight · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:20 pm

Updating my reads list by the way, nothing real solid yet as a lot of people are just becoming more active today. Gonna make the reads clear too.

TR: daves, Narna, Frank, Alchemist, Green Cryaons and Brian Skies (I keep calling him Blue Skies, sorry!!!)
Neutral: shannon, Titus and Gamma Emerald
Scum lean: RoryMK
SR: Umlaut & FireScreamer

FireScreamer · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:23 pm

In post 450, FireScreamer wrote:
In post 448, CommKnight wrote:Well last game Frank and Momo were inactive (Blue Skies, Momo's replacement) is pretty townie and Frank is a lot more active than he was. So I'd like to think they're both town at this point, but will reassess as time goes on. Right now I am certain something is up between FS/Umlaut though.
Why is Brian townie? Define the something between me and Umlaut and describe why you think it is the case.

CommKnight · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:24 pm

1.) Hunch.
2.) His defense of you.

FireScreamer · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:26 pm

Muh hunch.

FireScreamer · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:27 pm

Why do you post awful wall of texts but actual questioning gets that instead?

FireScreamer · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:28 pm

Also in the off chance you are town have a freaking sense of perspective. You are just scum reading people who are scum reading you and not looking at alternatives

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:47 pm

I'm kinda SRing Brian rn, for his pushing the not-trust tell. Seems like he was trying to get a player out of the way.

FireScreamer · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:53 pm

I think it was genuine anger at an action he believed to be unfair to him. At no point does he scumread me but then starts to push GC for arguing the semantics of the rules with him which doesn't seem AI

FireScreamer · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:54 pm

He is voting to remove opposition not to find scum. Consider my vote on him just as much as Comm

Brian Skies · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:14 pm

In post 454, FireScreamer wrote:Scum leans - You, Umlaut,
Brian

So, you think Umlaut and Comm are engaging in scum theater...or what?

In post 459, FireScreamer wrote:
In post 455, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why do you scumread Brian?
His read on GC doesn't seem to make a lot of sense outside of him white knighting for me.

He seemed frustrated by my actions being able to get me successfully townread while never actually making arguments as to why anything I was doing was scummy.
Just unfair.

In post 468, FireScreamer wrote:I think it was genuine anger at an action he believed to be unfair to him.
At no point does he scumread me
but then starts to push GC for arguing the semantics of the rules with him which doesn't seem AI

In post 469, FireScreamer wrote:He is voting to remove opposition not to find scum. Consider my vote on him just as much as Comm

Actually, I've yet to state a read on you or defend you in any way. Or really, try to lynch you in any way either.

Do you think I've been defending you or trying to get you lynched? Your narrative of me can't have it both ways.

You also haven't been reading my posts very closely if you seriously believe my vote on GC boils down to semantics.

ThinkBig · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:15 pm

FireScreamer · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:21 pm

I doubt that's the actual factual scum team Brian. I scumread them individually but not as a pair.

Also I didn't say you were defending me. Nor did I say you were trying to get me lynched.

Brian Skies · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:25 pm

In post 472, FireScreamer wrote:I doubt that's the actual factual scum team Brian. I scumread them individually but not as a pair.

Much commitment. Such town.

In post 472, FireScreamer wrote:Also I didn't say you were defending me. Nor did I say you were trying to get me lynched.

Do you know what whiteknighting is? You've also implied that I should be explaining why I think you're scummy, except I've had no reason to do so...?

FireScreamer · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:30 pm

You've never had independent day 1 reads before? I should throw out a scum read on a player due to the actions of a player who I don't know for sure the alignment of because it's day freaking 1? People correctly argued against me suggesting that last game.

I'm implying that you are voting GC for associative of arguing what a trust tell is and coming down on my side of it despite none of that being AI.