Bodyguard is different from my understanding of it so my apologies, but I still don't think it makes much of a difference, especially given the new definition. This explains why he fakeclaimed, at least. It doesn't make sense to shoot suboptimally if he's a bodyguard, but I have a hard time imagining that no one has figured out that optimal play is to do as Wraith did.In post 2919, Almost Chara wrote:What do you mean by risky?? They would've either killed one of you Masons OR ended up killing the BG anyway. They did NOT target you. They targeted the BG claim directly. That doesn't make much sense.In post 2865, Prism wrote:@A50:Wraith was roleblocked by town, farside flipped it and scumread Wraith iirc. Either way it's more likely than strongman. We also had a claimed bodyguard making any hit elsewhere inherently risky.
VOTE: Infinity
I always try to solve the game by putting myself in a scum mindset. If I was Scum why would I shoot the BG over 2 Masons and a claimed Cop whom I BELIEVED to be a Cop? And I explained why the 1-shot part didn't make sense with his play, so he's either multi-shot or he is lying. If he's lying then he is Scum. If not then he is multi-dhot and Scum would have shot him over the Masons, and certainly over the BG claim.
~A50
Double that his flavor claim made no sense and several people pointed this out.