Spring Fever (Endgame)

Vecna · Post Post #4925 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:37 pm

In post 4792, Heartless wrote:btw who needs active bonds?

we're going all passive after today

Ill need an active one for n3 nightchat....if we care about that at all.

Vecna · Post Post #4926 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:58 pm

In post 4815, Eddiebyte wrote:
In post 4759, Vecna wrote:
In post 4747, Eddiebyte wrote:er

why us...? do you still think that us mentioning an upcoming wallpost is scummy

gork too seems like an odd scumread but i guess i see your point with shiqf?
You were trying to dissuade the shitfuck lynch covertly, untill it became clear it was going to happen at which point you suddenly started to push it very weirdly (asking us to not even wait for claims).

I think RC liked the role/mechanics of my role in civ and gave it to scum here. It allowed changing of investigstion outcomes on a person if you could guess the type of investigative used.
so our way to dissuade it covertly was to scream at everyone to hammer?

This is not a genuine way to respond to the statement i made OR characterize your involvement there.

Vecna · Post Post #4927 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:00 pm

In post 4817, Titus wrote:
In post 4814, Eddiebyte wrote:hey Titus and vecna

how do you propose scum mess with watcher aside from blocking if they have a blocker or killing them? 4763 makes no sense because visiting heartless doesn't change any results, it literally adds us as a heartless visitor which we proved is true via pick cop. that helps verify watcher isn't scum with Titus, not messes with their result
They could pick just to kill Heartless, but that didn't happen.
They could pick to block me, but that didn't happen.
They could pick to kill me, but that didn't happen.
They could kill dunn, but that didn't happen.
They could to block dunn, but that didn't happen.

The only way that's even theoretically possible is if Eddie visited and changed the results, but that's just sketch and I don't really buy that.

The only solutions here mean suboptimal play or a jonky setup.

What's your read on random Eddie?

The correct play actually was to kill dunn......unless scum knew that McMenno overview was coming and we could deduce it anyway, or dunn is scum himself, or they just wanted us to get suspicious.

Transcend · Post Post #4928 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:18 pm

jjh927 · Post Post #4929 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:58 am

In post 304, Transcend wrote:i'll bond you guys i mean what's the worst that will happen

In post 346, Transcend wrote:331 was scummy

eddiebyte are we still bonding zzz

PEDIT: DAMN IT HEARTLESS

In post 1871, Transcend wrote:Eddiebyte are you sure you asked the mod for a bond yet

In post 4349, Transcend wrote:WHY HAVENT WE GOTTEN OUR BOND YET

DOES IT HAPPEN OVERNIGHT?

Pretty sure that's everything

Transcend · Post Post #4930 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:19 am

a'ite reading the game from start to finish will let you all know my thoughts

Transcend · Post Post #4931 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:20 am

a'ite i've read the game from start to finish and my thoughts are:

Bellaphant · Post Post #4932 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:30 am

Traaaans. What did you think needed to happen to bond?

Bellaphant · Post Post #4933 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:30 am

Because I think I know

Transcend · Post Post #4934 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:34 am

Need to stop yoloing and read mechanics

Are you still interested in bonding

If so I'll send a request to rc asap

Eddiebyte · Post Post #4935 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:35 am

lol trans u fuckign egg

yeah i'll send the request in again

Eddiebyte · Post Post #4936 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:36 am

we send in the request

rather

Transcend · Post Post #4937 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:37 am

Sent

So there's 3 scum left

Who could they be hmm hmm hmm

Titus · Post Post #4938 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:37 am

Dunn are you ok with tracking me or watching Aelita?

Firebringer · Post Post #4939 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:37 am

In post 4937, Transcend wrote:Sent

So there's 3 scum left

Who could they be hmm hmm hmm

U are one.

Transcend · Post Post #4940 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:38 am

Probably me tbh

Pedit NINJA'D

Transcend · Post Post #4941 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:39 am

Alright so I'm not interested in digging through 200 pages of shit

What notable claims have been made

Firebringer · Post Post #4942 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:39 am

Whose your two allies?

Transcend · Post Post #4943 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:39 am

Firebringer and RadiantCowbells

Transcend · Post Post #4944 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:40 am

Oh wait i actually have a third partner but they don't post much in the scum pt. My bad.

Firebringer · Post Post #4945 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:42 am

In post 4943, Transcend wrote:Firebringer and RadiantCowbells

I would never be allies with RadiantCowbells, he smells.

Titus · Post Post #4946 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:43 am

In post 4941, Transcend wrote:Alright so I'm not interested in digging through 200 pages of shit

What notable claims have been made

I am loyal in passive bond.
Dunn is tracker or watcher depending on bond.
Heartless is town barring a ninja framer or Eddie framer and that just seems unlikely.
Eddie visited Heartless with his pick cop last night.

Transcend · Post Post #4947 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:43 am

RadiantCowbells more like RadiantCowsmells

Mirite

Transcend · Post Post #4948 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:44 am

Ah thank fuck heartless got townfirmed

They were scary.

Transcend · Post Post #4949 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:46 am

If a player is Loyal, then any attempts by that player to use a night action on a player with a different alignment will fail (as though they had been roleblocked). As such, a Loyal player can only succeed with actions when targeting a player of the same alignment.