In post 322, Tywin Lannister wrote:I never contradicted myself. You did though Mr I'm Not Freaking Out after 50 posts in 5 minutes and then saying you're more level headed when scum.In post 319, Boonskiies wrote:he then chose to not acknowledge any of those contradictions I posted of his.
This post is so contradictory I really think it has to be town. I think Tywin is just town who doesn't realize they are contradicting himself.In post 290, Tywin Lannister wrote:Meta is based on the players actions for each alignment, not the common themes that happen in every game. There will always be one active scum and one extreme lurker scum. I haven't ever seen a game where that hasn't occurred, and I've played mafia a long time on multiple sites. Idc about meta either. I do care about finding scum, and I think youre scum.
Now, if you aren't, feel free to have a legitimate discussion with me so we can sort each other. If that leads to two TRs, then a town bloc forms with strong players. If you just keep up what you're doing though, I will get you lynched and I know you'll flip scum. Reading between the lines isn't so difficult for everyone, and more than just the words you use, I also look at what the intent behind it is. I don't mean 'scum motive' that people say a lot, because all scum motivation is to not get lynched and lynch town, while all town motive is to lynch scum over town and if a PR, not get themselves lynched. That's it. What I mean is that you're smart enough and good enough to know how to manipulate the game with the common scum tactics I already mentioned, and you've been using them to a T. You'd know as town that I'm feeling you out and do the same with me, but you're going all out aggressive once I called you out.
Is it common for you to switch to super aggression after being called out when town? What about scum? I'm curious as to your mindset in these situations.
You are saying here that they would be Town and scum. You jump from the town town idea to Boon being scum. I can understand the thought process, but it's a little muddled so I'm trying to help you clarify.In post 327, Gamma Emerald wrote:This post is so contradictory I really think it has to be town. I think Tywin is just town who doesn't realize they are contradicting himself.In post 290, Tywin Lannister wrote:Meta is based on the players actions for each alignment, not the common themes that happen in every game. There will always be one active scum and one extreme lurker scum. I haven't ever seen a game where that hasn't occurred, and I've played mafia a long time on multiple sites. Idc about meta either. I do care about finding scum,and I think youre scum.Reading between the lines isn't so difficult for everyone, and more than just the words you use, I also look at what the intent behind it is. I don't mean 'scum motive' that people say a lot, because all scum motivation is to not get lynched and lynch town, while all town motive is to lynch scum over town and if a PR, not get themselves lynched. That's it. What I mean is that you're smart enough and good enough to know how to manipulate the game with the common scum tactics I already mentioned, and you've been using them to a T. You'd know as town that I'm feeling you out and do the same with me, but you're going all out aggressive once I called you out.
Now, if you aren't, feel free to have a legitimate discussion with me so we can sort each other. If that leads to two TRs, then a town bloc forms with strong players. If you just keep up what you're doing though, I will get you lynched and I know you'll flip scum.
Is it common for you to switch to super aggression after being called out when town? What about scum? I'm curious as to your mindset in these situations.
In post 31, rb wrote:VOTE: gamma emeraldIn post 30, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hello. I'll start with a RQS since I don't think I've done it in a while, even ignoring my absence.
1: What is your favorite open setup and why?
2: What is your favorite and least favorite role, and why?
3: On a scale of one to ten how excited are you for this game?
4: Who do you not have experience with in this playerlist?
My answers
1: Jungle Anarchy, since it's a setup that relies a lot on scumhunting rather than PRs
2: I like Vigilantes, since I have had some good experiences with them. I don't like Gladiators much since they can cause major problems if used by bad town.
3: Eight. I liked the last setup that Dierfire had, but I'm hoping we can get something more interesting this time around.
4: A lot. The only ones I DO have experience with is rb, Tywin, and Flubbernugget.
Meh
I don't like this considering I had to read through page 1 of fluff
id like to reread the game without having endless fluff to wade through
Any original thoughts for me or whatIn post 332, WhyMafia wrote:In post 31, rb wrote:VOTE: gamma emeraldIn post 30, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hello. I'll start with a RQS since I don't think I've done it in a while, even ignoring my absence.
1: What is your favorite open setup and why?
2: What is your favorite and least favorite role, and why?
3: On a scale of one to ten how excited are you for this game?
4: Who do you not have experience with in this playerlist?
My answers
1: Jungle Anarchy, since it's a setup that relies a lot on scumhunting rather than PRs
2: I like Vigilantes, since I have had some good experiences with them. I don't like Gladiators much since they can cause major problems if used by bad town.
3: Eight. I liked the last setup that Dierfire had, but I'm hoping we can get something more interesting this time around.
4: A lot. The only ones I DO have experience with is rb, Tywin, and Flubbernugget.
Meh
I don't like this considering I had to read through page 1 of fluff
id like to reread the game without having endless fluff to wade through
1) I haven't played any open setups yet so *shrug*In post 30, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hello. I'll start with a RQS since I don't think I've done it in a while, even ignoring my absence.
1: What is your favorite open setup and why?
2: What is your favorite and least favorite role, and why?
3: On a scale of one to ten how excited are you for this game?
4: Who do you not have experience with in this playerlist?
My answers
1: Jungle Anarchy, since it's a setup that relies a lot on scumhunting rather than PRs
2: I like Vigilantes, since I have had some good experiences with them. I don't like Gladiators much since they can cause major problems if used by bad town.
3: Eight. I liked the last setup that Dierfire had, but I'm hoping we can get something more interesting this time around.
4: A lot. The only ones I DO have experience with is rb, Tywin, and Flubbernugget.
Lemme read upIn post 334, Gamma Emerald wrote:Any original thoughts for me or whatIn post 332, WhyMafia wrote:In post 31, rb wrote:VOTE: gamma emeraldIn post 30, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hello. I'll start with a RQS since I don't think I've done it in a while, even ignoring my absence.
1: What is your favorite open setup and why?
2: What is your favorite and least favorite role, and why?
3: On a scale of one to ten how excited are you for this game?
4: Who do you not have experience with in this playerlist?
My answers
1: Jungle Anarchy, since it's a setup that relies a lot on scumhunting rather than PRs
2: I like Vigilantes, since I have had some good experiences with them. I don't like Gladiators much since they can cause major problems if used by bad town.
3: Eight. I liked the last setup that Dierfire had, but I'm hoping we can get something more interesting this time around.
4: A lot. The only ones I DO have experience with is rb, Tywin, and Flubbernugget.
Meh
I don't like this considering I had to read through page 1 of fluff
id like to reread the game without having endless fluff to wade through
Not true. I personally think mafia goon is quite boring to play asIn post 47, Tywin Lannister wrote:Nobody ever gets excited to be town, and regardless, he's scum.
Fair enough.In post 48, Tywin Lannister wrote:Don't care at all about your meta btw. You saying you have posts all over and people should know you shows you manipulate it when scum.
In post 340, WhyMafia wrote:Fair enough.In post 48, Tywin Lannister wrote:Don't care at all about your meta btw. You saying you have posts all over and people should know you shows you manipulate it when scum.
I think meta is a weak argument as well
Oh my apologies. MisclickedIn post 339, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why did you quote rb's comment about my RQS then do the RQS
holy crap, this is so bad.In post 343, Tywin Lannister wrote:I still don't see how that's a contradiction? I think he's scum, but there's no guilty result in him. I don't have flips to associate him with. I think his freak out by posting so erratically after I called him out comes from scum. He's said how well he does when scum, which says he has an ego. If he rolled scum here and got lynched D1 (and he claims to never have been lynched or lost a game as scum) then its a HUGE ego blow to him. Following me?
So now imagine he tried buddying two main players here. One is the lynchbait who may flip D1 in RB. If RB is town and Boonskies scim, and if he assumes rb will be lynched, it benefits him to buddy the lynchbait and get town cred after he flips. He can also then go after whomever he wants on the RB wagon. Now go to me. He originally called me newbscum, and did so by sheeping rb. When I questioned it, he switched to saying I have town points and he won't vote me. It's a way to buddy me. It's obvious I'm a belligerent player in general, so him getting on my good side is good for !scumBoonskies. It takes away a lot of pressure. Still following?
So then I called him out on it. I said he's buddying (I said buttering up if you want exact wording), and said I SR him. Then I went off on my general theory of the common scum playstyles and archetypes, and I fit Boonskies as the aggressive slot.
So within 14 posts, Boonskies went from saying i get town cred and he won't vote me to saying I'm conf scum and he wants to death tunnel. Then he starts posting an absolute shit ton in a very short tomespan, shows common scum tactics (discredit, deflect, mock, ignore, cherry pick, etc), and even goes so far as to use AtE to get others to push me too. All within a 14 post time span and only after I called him out and said he's scum.
Does any of that look fishy to you?