I'm not speaking of ratio here. I already assume its 3 scum. If we get 3 red flips and game doesn't end, it's 4 or third party. That's kind of common sense though. I never go into games thinking less than 3 scum. Maybe 3 and a traitor.In post 542, Boonskiies wrote:In post 534, Tywin Lannister wrote:Honestly, I know you all trash talk my theory about scum team playstyles, but who wants to bet at least one scum is in the one post wonder column of Cooldog/backhand/biochemist/fuzzylogic/etc and remains a prod dodging lurker the entire game? Any takers for post game?
I'll also bet that my theory holds true almost entirely this game. One real active scum who tries to be town leader, one hardcore prod dodging lurker, and one to two background fence sitters that nobody remembers exists.
I'm speaking for post game here, but Mark it down. We'll see whose right after the game.
I mean, 4/11 chance it's 3:10....not groundbreaking scumhunting there.
Ok. He voted him. After there was a wagon on RB already. Let's keep reading!
So does everyone at that state of the game. Why vote RB for that reason alone?In post 68, Flubbernugget wrote:TL also has a lot of fluff
Seems to me like he doesn't want pressure on himIn post 74, Flubbernugget wrote:Isn't 4th on the wagon what you look at after a slot flips townIn post 70, Tywin Lannister wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: flubber
I wanted to see who'd join 4th slot. Now I know
wait what. I don't understand this. Did he want to sheep RB at one point? Even though he was already voting him? Seeing as he's kinda meh on his read, why doesn't he unvote?In post 78, Flubbernugget wrote:That's where I was going but when you make posts like this I don't want to sheep youIn post 72, rb wrote:so dumbIn post 69, Tywin Lannister wrote:There is no terrible town or terrible scum, only terrible players. You'd have won as either alignment against bad players.In post 58, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm sorry but I have to back rb here, I've been part of a scumread that won thanks to a terrible town.
it's like a totally different game playing town vs. playing scum
In post 79, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm not sure where you're seeing a dichotomyIn post 75, Gamma Emerald wrote:I personally don't like Flub's response to the dichotomy.
VOTE: Flubbernugget
In post 85, Flubbernugget wrote:1) Rb should be getting better reads off of his flashwagon
2)Flashwagon means less rqs fluff
In post 86, Flubbernugget wrote:I almost want to ask you to elaborate but I know betterIn post 84, Tywin Lannister wrote:You're not very good at this... are you? I'm obvious town.In post 77, rb wrote:wrong flashwagon noobs
In post 87, Flubbernugget wrote:I consider that to be irrelevant to this game. Why do you disagree mIn post 80, Gamma Emerald wrote:The dichotomy of scum or town being easier to win at.In post 79, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm not sure where you're seeing a dichotomyIn post 75, Gamma Emerald wrote:I personally don't like Flub's response to the dichotomy.
VOTE: Flubbernugget
In post 88, Flubbernugget wrote:Quick disclaimer
My posts have the worst typos on the site and I'm getting less and less interested in trying to correct them
In post 91, Flubbernugget wrote:Both sides?In post 89, Gamma Emerald wrote:In saying your vote on rb followed by accusing Tywin of fluffing seems rather like playing both sides.In post 87, Flubbernugget wrote:I consider that to be irrelevant to this game. Why do you disagree mIn post 80, Gamma Emerald wrote:The dichotomy of scum or town being easier to win at.In post 79, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm not sure where you're seeing a dichotomyIn post 75, Gamma Emerald wrote:I personally don't like Flub's response to the dichotomy.
VOTE: Flubbernugget
You do realize there's probably more than one scum in the game right?
In post 95, Flubbernugget wrote:You think you're cute don't you
In post 153, Flubbernugget wrote:GrrrrrrrIn post 115, Boonskiies wrote:Flubber has caught me out on a lie before when I was scum, he got lynched, and I survived the next three days afterwards. Not relevant, but that's my funniest flubber moment.
more reads from you plzIn post 155, Flubbernugget wrote:More reads PlsIn post 145, Michael Lee wrote:My policy lynch "not serious" vote now changed to a serious scumread vote
"Shitposting=scum" not when I say it's a policy lynch, you don't even try to look at what I read, you just turn it against me while misinterpreting it, then go "3rd scum found" as if the entire scumteam is going to pile on to you like that. I didn't scumread you before but I do now.
In post 157, Flubbernugget wrote:Who is scum
In post 193, Flubbernugget wrote:Why is rb useless and not just scum
In post 207, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm starting to see where Boonskiies is coming from
In post 494, Flubbernugget wrote:BoonskiiesIn post 283, Boonskiies wrote:And I'd let my buddies bus the hell out of me. The game I was talking about earlier with flubber, I claimed tracker day 1, day 2 I claimed a guilty on my buddy, we got in a deep 1v1, day 4 I got in a deep 1v1 with my other buddy and got him lynched. Won the game in lylo where I kept alive a claimed mason from day 1. You're flawed. Don't use the "you've never played with me" defense if you aren't willing to accept it both ways.
I think you're a cool dude
But the way you bring that game up I really think you peaked early
hypocrite much?In post 496, Flubbernugget wrote:There's a whole 1v1 to comment onIn post 308, Gamma Emerald wrote:Missing the point. He was telling rb to play serious. No alignment evaluation was involved.In post 193, Flubbernugget wrote:Why is rb useless and not just scum
Why is this the only thing you're seeing
You won't vote him bc of which comment? The one by Ty saying that he might vote Flubber depending on my post?In post 557, Boonskiies wrote:yeah, im not going onto flubber after that comment.
yes, and I can't figure why youd think thisIn post 488, Kasumeat wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this could be scum v scum?In post 485, WhyMafia wrote:@Everyone
I don't think boon "freaked out" per say. He initiated this "1 v 1" of sort. What kind of scum draws that much attention to himself
You're at L-5In post 561, Tywin Lannister wrote:Nvm read the VC wrong. K well, good luck you two. I'll be dead before you even if you're both town, because you vote town over scum hunting.
where the hell did i ever say I would vote rb? WTF?!?! here we are with the straight up lying again. I won't vote rb toDay either.In post 559, Tywin Lannister wrote:Boonskies won't go on flubber, but will vote rb, the obvious lynchbait player. Irony
Sheep me. I want to feel special and noteworthyIn post 566, Boonskiies wrote:where the hell did i ever say I would vote rb? WTF?!?! here we are with the straight up lying again. I won't vote rb toDay either.In post 559, Tywin Lannister wrote:Boonskies won't go on flubber, but will vote rb, the obvious lynchbait player. Irony
mehIn post 563, Michael Lee wrote:yes, and I can't figure why youd think thisIn post 488, Kasumeat wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this could be scum v scum?In post 485, WhyMafia wrote:@Everyone
I don't think boon "freaked out" per say. He initiated this "1 v 1" of sort. What kind of scum draws that much attention to himselfunlessif you're scum, hence my comment on "kasumeat is scum" earlier
like how do you read that and actually consider the possibility of it being scum vs scum - that seems like some scummy thing to say especially if theyre town vs town
putting it out here: if choof is scum, then boon and twyn are both town
that said I townread the others regardless of choofs alignment, but thats a personal read and this is an interaction which is more telling
That's horrible logic though. He could exploit that on youIn post 570, Boonskiies wrote:Im not voting anywhere tywin is okay with. Im probably not leaving his wagon unless choof is near hammer range and we're getting down to the deadline.
And opportunistic! And a hypocrite!In post 571, Tywin Lannister wrote:WhyMAfia: It's clear what you're getting at here. You're calling him a fence sitter who isn't actually looking to find scum.
