Spring Fever (Endgame)

Firebringer · Post Post #6300 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 12:44 pm

looking back on vecna posts, their transition to getting heartless to town was bad and contrived.
Also Titus push is bad.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #6301 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 12:46 pm

Spring Fever Mafia

Votecount 2.253:

Vecna (6): Firebringer, Heartless, Mcmenno, Titus, Aelita, Fro99er
Titus (3): Vecna, Transcend, Bellaphant
jjh927 (1): EddieByte
Mcmenno (1): jjh927
EddieByte (1): Dunnstral
Dunnstral (1):
Transcend (0):
Randomidget (0):
Bellaphant (0):
Heartless (0):
Firebringer (0):
Fro99er (0):
Aelita (0):

Alisae (

0

):

Not Voting: Randomidget,

Alisae

With 13 alive it's 7 to lynch.
The day will end in (expired on 2017-05-11 11:00:00).

Firebringer · Post Post #6302 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 12:55 pm

what kind of action?

jjh927 · Post Post #6303 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 4:37 pm

Can we talk about Aelita's Vecna case?

Aelita- I want to make one thing clear here- I have read it, and disagree with a lot of it. I don't want to spend the time it would take rebutting and analysing my way through it, so could you reduce it to perhaps 2-3 of the points you feel are the strongest there? Again, I have read it. This it not me ignoring you or asking for a TLDR. I'm giving this one last shot at a sensible discussion.

Fro99er · Post Post #6304 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:24 pm

So you are Vecna's buddy?

Heartless · Post Post #6305 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:36 pm

ahhhhh jeez, i hate 6281 so much

Heartless · Post Post #6306 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:39 pm

re: bonding rn we have dunn and jj down

if we're going to shift over to bella who's going to enable dunn's watch?

Titus · Post Post #6307 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:41 pm

In post 6306, Heartless wrote:re: bonding rn we have dunn and jj down

if we're going to shift over to bella who's going to enable dunn's watch?

Eddie?

Heartless · Post Post #6308 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:45 pm

i am not townreading eddie in any way and i do not want to give them anything

if we're bonding, we're not gonna be passive

Fro99er · Post Post #6309 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:46 pm

I think we get less out of heartless/JJ/Dunn and Eddie/Bella bonding than we do Heartless/JJ/Bella bonding and Eddie/Dunn bonding?

Fro99er · Post Post #6310 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:47 pm

In post 6308, Heartless wrote:i am not townreading eddie in any way and i do not want to give them anything

if we're bonding, we're not gonna be passive

Nobody said you're bonding Eddie.

Given my townread of Bella and knowledge of her role, I'm pretty sure it's okay if she is active

Dunn can be active while Eddie is passive

Titus · Post Post #6311 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:48 pm

In post 6310, Fro99er wrote:
In post 6308, Heartless wrote:i am not townreading eddie in any way and i do not want to give them anything

if we're bonding, we're not gonna be passive
Nobody said you're bonding Eddie.

Given my townread of Bella and knowledge of her role, I'm pretty sure it's okay if she is active

Dunn can be active while Eddie is passive

I suggested it...

Titus · Post Post #6312 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:48 pm

But if that's not in the pool Heartless wants ok.

Heartless · Post Post #6313 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:49 pm

i misread 6307 hurr durr

Heartless · Post Post #6314 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:50 pm

In post 6309, Fro99er wrote:Heartless/JJ/Bella

i like this

running it by tth

Fro99er · Post Post #6315 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:51 pm

In post 6311, Titus wrote:I suggested it...

Congrats?

Fro99er · Post Post #6316 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:52 pm

In post 6315, Fro99er wrote:
In post 6311, Titus wrote:I suggested it...
Congrats?

FWIW JJ suggested it about 1500 posts ago and I agreed back then.

But we can let you have the credit.

Fro99er · Post Post #6317 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:58 pm

In post 5798, jjh927 wrote:Actually, Heartless, what would you think about bonding with me and Bella?

In post 5802, Heartless wrote:
In post 5798, jjh927 wrote:Actually, Heartless, what would you think about bonding with me and Bella?
i could go for that

let me ask tth

In post 5803, Fro99er wrote:^^^ I encourage this also

Fro99er · Post Post #6318 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 5:58 pm

Lol almost exactly 1500 posts ago. That was a total guess

Titus · Post Post #6319 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 6:01 pm

Oh I was referring to the Eddie thing Heartless rejected...

We're getting wires crossed a lot here. LOL

Heartless · Post Post #6320 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 6:04 pm

tth has given the green light

bond submitted to rc

Fro99er · Post Post #6321 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 6:12 pm

In post 6319, Titus wrote:Oh I was referring to the Eddie thing Heartless rejected...

We're getting wires crossed a lot here. LOL

Ah my b

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #6322 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 6:57 pm

As much flak as I give you guys for posting so much I appreciate having an active thread and not having to prod anyone.

=]

Aelita · Post Post #6323 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 7:55 pm

In post 6303, jjh927 wrote:Can we talk about Aelita's Vecna case?

Aelita- I want to make one thing clear here- I have read it, and disagree with a lot of it. I don't want to spend the time it would take rebutting and analysing my way through it, so could you reduce it to perhaps 2-3 of the points you feel are the strongest there? Again, I have read it. This it not me ignoring you or asking for a TLDR. I'm giving this one last shot at a sensible discussion.

No. If you are too lazy to dispute it as a whole, then I will not indulge your laziness. You don't value my opinions whatsoever, and you treat me as an idiot just for having different reads than you. If you don't value anything I say as sensible, why should I try?

Transcend · Post Post #6324 (ISO) » Tue May 02, 2017 7:55 pm

VOTE: Vecna

Night bitches