We won't need 9 days to lynch confscum!FirescreamerIn post 1, Something_Smart wrote:Days are approximately 9 days long
VOTE: Firescreamer
We won't need 9 days to lynch confscum!FirescreamerIn post 1, Something_Smart wrote:Days are approximately 9 days long
Oh shit. Good thing I'm a 1-shot Bulletproof and DoublevoterIn post 1, Something_Smart wrote:If you die in this game, you die in real life.
But you did refute the townread when you meta dove TB?In post 61, FireScreamer wrote:>MM states they are townreading Radja's effort
>I make a tryhardy attempt to examine the TB read
>I ask to be townread for it
>Initially I get a denial that tryharding is a townread because I "refuted" it
>I tell MM that no I didn't, I refuted the other thing, you by your own logic should still townread tryharding
>MM laughs it off and gives me a townread
MM got multiple chances for the correct response of "of course I don't townread you for that, you just read what I was townreading and became it".
You could say MM's responses are just joking RVS stuff. but the reason they gave for giving the intial two reads in the first place was to get out of RVS.
FS's push on MM is bad because MM is townand FS's logic behind the push is bad.In post 123, FireScreamer wrote:What was shitty about it?
In post 220, FireScreamer wrote:I want to engage Tenshi. Please come to the thread Tenshi.
lelIn post 114, Tenshii wrote:But you did refute the townread when you meta dove TB?
FS has not responded to this. His logic is bad and still is bad. His whole case revolves around you not townreading when you should be yet it isn't the case at all.In post 114, Tenshii wrote:But you did refute the townread when you meta dove TB?In post 61, FireScreamer wrote:>MM states they are townreading Radja's effort
>I make a tryhardy attempt to examine the TB read
>I ask to be townread for it
>Initially I get a denial that tryharding is a townread because I "refuted" it
>I tell MM that no I didn't, I refuted the other thing, you by your own logic should still townread tryharding
>MM laughs it off and gives me a townread
MM got multiple chances for the correct response of "of course I don't townread you for that, you just read what I was townreading and became it".
You could say MM's responses are just joking RVS stuff. but the reason they gave for giving the intial two reads in the first place was to get out of RVS.
No. The fact that you refuted the townread on TB proves it also can be applied to others.In post 250, FireScreamer wrote:I didn't refute the townread on Banana when I meta dove TB.
MM TRs Banana tryharding.In post 23, MarioManiac4 wrote:bananananana and TB are both on opposite ends of a spectrum; TB just blank-votes and Banana is tryharding
FS tryharded by metadiving TBs wiki and proving TB shouldn't be TR'dIn post 30, FireScreamer wrote:Went onto his wiki. He formats it super nice. Sorted by TB posts in games he started (which he also helpfully labels) and looked at the first post.
MM accepts.In post 32, MarioManiac4 wrote:yeah alright.
FS asks MM if FS should be TR'd for tryharding.In post 37, FireScreamer wrote:So do ya townread me for tryharding TB's meta?
MM realizes that FS tryharding isn't necessarily towny as well. MM then TRs FS for proving MM wrong????In post 39, MarioManiac4 wrote:You have given me an example that I am wrong with that tho.
I feel so enlightened
Screw you. I gave opinions in both. And how am I even scummy?In post 279, MarioManiac4 wrote:last game he was randomly voting all over the place and wasn't giving any opinions
this game he is giving scummy and bad opinions
Like NOTHING HERE correlates with anything I said. Everything you said is misrepping me for things that either didn't happen or you are misreading.In post 291, EchoVision wrote:wait you talk about how you want to vote 3 people in this post but not a single one of them is the person who you actually vote. In the beginning of this post, you mention how FS's push on MM is bad, which I don't completely argue at this point, but what do you think makes his push here bad?In post 237, Tenshii wrote:I still stand by the fact that FS's logic on the MM push is bad. But apparently FS can be town here. The fact that FS hasn't bothered to explain his logic isn't helping though. FS's basis for pushing MM is that MM could've still justified a townread when FS unjustified it.
The case on Beli is also bad. His RVS play is null and just being painted into something scummy. Beli also shared my stance on FS's push which is a reason why he's getting pushed.
I think it's standard mafia play to use your vote to pressure a slot.
MM + Wisdom + Banana has stated a scumread on my slot yet didn't vote me. I think there's at least one scum in Wisdom + Banana just sheeping MM here.
Leaning Banana because I agree with Wisdom's point of Banana spreading paranoia rather than offering stances.
VOTE: Banana
But I'd rather vote FS here. I think that FS should justify his stance on MM because everyone is leaning towards Tenshii + Beli because of it.
"But apparently FS can be town here." Then you go along to say this, implying that you believe FS to be scum and everybody else believes him to be town. If you believe that FS is not of town alignment, vote for him.
"The case on Beli is also bad. His RVS play is null and just being painted into something scummy. Beli also shared my stance on FS's push which is a reason why he's getting pushed." You explain what you find that makes this case bad, however what motivation do you believe ThinkBig would have to "paint this case into something scummy?" Do you scum read ThinkBig for making this bad case against Beli?
What's the need to mention that a vote pressures a slot? It doesn't fit in and seems like scattered thoughts that you just kinda compiled together, which I read as a little scummy because town usually has their posts well thought out and organized, at least in my experiences. Whereas scum just kinda compiles whatever comes into mind hoping that some of it has a towny connotation to it.
After this you go on to mention that you believe Wisdom or Banana are scum who are sheeping MM, which means you scum read MM as well, or else they wouldn't be sheeping.So far, you have claimed a scum read on FS, Banana, Wisdom, and MM.Also, if you scum read MM, then what makes FS's push against MM bad? Obviously it has swayed you in some way.
Finally you top this post off with a vote on banana, then say you'd rather vote FS. Alright. Cool.
I'll vote at the end of my catchup cause I don't know where votes are and I'm not looking for an accidental hammer.
In post 312, Tenshii wrote:I have a mindset that town is logical in their own way and scum isn't because scum needs to frame town for being scum.
You do not think this.
Maybe if you reread I willIn post 321, EchoVision wrote:instead of telling me that I'm wrong and leaving it at that, can you explain what I said that you interpreted as misrepping as well as what you believe I have misread?In post 297, Tenshii wrote: Like NOTHING HERE correlates with anything I said. Everything you said is misrepping me for things that either didn't happen or you are misreading.
They didn't?In post 335, FireScreamer wrote:If Tenshi had a problem with my case he should have a problem with TB and or Maker as well. Agreeing with a shitty push is much worse than making one.
You proved it yourself that you know your push is weak.In post 342, EchoVision wrote:Why do you find Tenshi townier? What town motivation do you believe the post i brought up a while ago possesses? Do you scum read me now for my weak Tenshi push?