I predicted you'd do that before the game even started. I'm one step ahead of you!
VOTE: MarioManiac4
Might as well help MM's scumbuddy bus.
I predicted you'd do that before the game even started. I'm one step ahead of you!
What the crispy crunchy Christ is this dreck? You're scumreading Mario for not reading your mind.In post 61, FireScreamer wrote:MM got multiple chances for the correct response of "of course I don't townread you for that, you just read what I was townreading and became it".
*brain explodes*In post 69, BTD6_maker wrote:Of course, if MM says that effort was a Towntell, then if someone subsequently tries to put in effort and ask to be Townread it ceases to be a Towntell as scum can easily fake anything once they know what they will be Townread for. I think that is what FireScreamer meant.
Three reasons:In post 85, ThinkBig wrote:
P-edit: I understand you have one vote, but you completely ignored my post-RVS fluff. Why?
Fire declared his vote no longer RVSIn post 86, ThinkBig wrote:Also, I'd love for you to explain why MM's naked vote on you makes enough sense to warrant an unvote.
Of course not! Why would I move my vote if I did?In post 96, ThinkBig wrote:Also I have a major problem with the bolded. Do you agree with Fire's assessment of Mario?
I literally just answered that question.In post 101, ThinkBig wrote:Why/How did Fire sort Mario for you and how do you come to two different conclusions?
In post 99, Belisarius wrote: Fire's announcement his vote was not RVS was the catalyst for Mario's vote on me
therefore I would not have a read on Mario if not for Fire
therefore Fire sorted Mario for me.
I already answered this -- for the early fluff.In post 164, MarioManiac4 wrote:Banana and Beli, why are you voting Echo?
thisIn post 188, EchoVision wrote:what exactly is mcclishs methodology?In post 113, Belisarius wrote:A bit frustrating, but I don't see anything with scum motivation in them.
I'm tempted to give McClish's methodology another go once we get some more pages and if I'm still alive, but it's only worked once for me so far.
A bit late, I know, but I don't like this.In post 184, BananaNSFW wrote:I have the feeling we are not going to get along in this game. Again. Do you remember how that ended last time?
But this is not frustrating as town as well? News to me.In post 303, MarioManiac4 wrote:There is nothing more frustrating as scum as being accused for illogical reasons by an illogical townie. You simply can not use logic to make it go away.
What's to address? I'm not buying the backpedalling. Up until I pointed out the FUD, you were phrasing your interaction with Wisdom like a threat. Threats generate FUD. FUD is good for scum and bad for town. It couldn't get any simpler.
Since I do not think that is what has happened, this is a strawman.In post 337, BananaNSFW wrote:So you disagree there is town motivation in reminding of bad reads?
Sure.In post 344, BananaNSFW wrote:Quote my posts and explain how it was not what I was doing. Also explain what the scum motivation was.
Reads as "Bad thing happened. I can make bad thing happen again. Don't make me angry, Mr. McGee. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry"In post 184, BananaNSFW wrote:I have the feeling we are not going to get along in this game. Again. Do you remember how that ended last time?
No, I'm done quoting #186. It's pointless.In post 367, BananaNSFW wrote:thanks. Are you going to answer my other questions?In post 350, Belisarius wrote:Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt
Before this game, I've been in exactly one game with Wisdom in which I was not scum, and in that game, we were both hydras and (IIRC) he was scum. For this reason, I consider Wisdom's tunnel on me to be not alignment indicative--it was most likely decided before role PMs went out.In post 377, EchoVision wrote:Just to clarify, you scum read maker? However since nobody else scum reads maker you're putting Beli at L-1?? Seems too opportunistic to be town. Town here wants to draw the day out a little more to get more of a handle on the game, not get a possible mislynch.In post 364, MarioManiac4 wrote:VOTE: Belisarius
I already know from last time nobody wants to wagon maker- let's see where this goes!
That's L1 folks! We are policylynchingEchoVisionanyone who hammers without giving intent tomorrow!
Also why is my name on this post??
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." ~ Albert Einstein.In post 395, EchoVision wrote:Beli, is there any way that you would like to defend yourself?