In post 222, MarioManiac4 wrote:Alright I phrased that unclearly.
What Beli did in his first post is state that he disliked Fire's logic and thought it was "dreck." I'm not sure going on to ignore it is indicative of alignment.
Beli hasn't done too much but I feel like he's been doing that in a much less scummy way than what Tenshii is doing.
Can you explain the teneshii read a bit more? The only things I see in her ISO is a few RVS fluff posts. The only thing that I see worth noting is that teneshii promised a catch up yesterday afternoon that still hasn't come.
he doesn't appear inquisitive at all, isn't thinking about anything
only voted fs for using bad logic- which is in itself bad logic, but more scummy
Of course not. I'll explain what made me said that after we hear more from Tenshi. Would also like to hear more from Maker but I don't NEED that before I can move forward.
In the dark, it's nearly invisible—until it exhales.
In post 222, MarioManiac4 wrote:Alright I phrased that unclearly.
What Beli did in his first post is state that he disliked Fire's logic and thought it was "dreck." I'm not sure going on to ignore it is indicative of alignment.
Beli hasn't done too much but I feel like he's been doing that in a much less scummy way than what Tenshii is doing.
Can you explain the teneshii read a bit more? The only things I see in her ISO is a few RVS fluff posts. The only thing that I see worth noting is that teneshii promised a catch up yesterday afternoon that still hasn't come.
he doesn't appear inquisitive at all, isn't thinking about anything
only voted fs for using bad logic- which is in itself bad logic, but more scummy
To be fair, most of his posts and votes fee RVSy. I really need to hear from teneshii
I have officially retired this account. My new account is Virtuoso.
I still stand by the fact that FS's logic on the MM push is bad. But apparently FS can be town here. The fact that FS hasn't bothered to explain his logic isn't helping though. FS's basis for pushing MM is that MM could've still justified a townread when FS unjustified it.
The case on Beli is also bad. His RVS play is null and just being painted into something scummy. Beli also shared my stance on FS's push which is a reason why he's getting pushed.
I think it's standard mafia play to use your vote to pressure a slot.
MM + Wisdom + Banana has stated a scumread on my slot yet didn't vote me. I think there's at least one scum in Wisdom + Banana just sheeping MM here.
Leaning Banana because I agree with Wisdom's point of Banana spreading paranoia rather than offering stances.
VOTE: Banana
But I'd rather vote FS here. I think that FS should justify his stance on MM because everyone is leaning towards Tenshii + Beli because of it.
In post 241, Tenshii wrote:Because there have been people who agree with the fact that FS's push is bad but not necessarily him being scum.
like
you say people think it's town
but you don't *re-evaluate* it? like you want to stick to the read but don't want to be seen as tunnelling?
and also with that above admission, why did you revote FireScreamer?
but you're literally just ignoring them
you acknowledge that you want FS lynched, and you acknowledge people are townreading FS
but it doesn't feel like you're trying to convince us to lynch him
I've stated/proved why his logic is bad and no one has refuted it. People just continue to townread him.
the burden to convince is on you because you are the person who is scumreading FireScreamer
you haven't stated/proved why his logic is bad, you've just said "I don't like FS's logic, FS is scum"
In post 61, FireScreamer wrote:>MM states they are townreading Radja's effort
>I make a tryhardy attempt to examine the TB read
>I ask to be townread for it
>Initially I get a denial that tryharding is a townread because I "refuted" it
>I tell MM that no I didn't, I refuted the other thing, you by your own logic should still townread tryharding
>MM laughs it off and gives me a townread
MM got multiple chances for the correct response of "of course I don't townread you for that, you just read what I was townreading and became it".
You could say MM's responses are just joking RVS stuff. but the reason they gave for giving the intial two reads in the first place was to get out of RVS.
But you did refute the townread when you meta dove TB?
FS has not responded to this. His logic is bad and still is bad. His whole case revolves around you not townreading when you should be yet it isn't the case at all.
