![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
But probably Riley, because they bother me, or maybe Sonia, same reason.
Can you discuss you being more power house? Because I linked 2 scum games of yours, and 1 of them fell short of power house by a large amount.In post 656, TiphaineDeath wrote:I object, because it will probably make the town lose, since I am town. But honestly that's all I got.
Also if anyone cares about meta I am much more of a powerhouse as scum xD.
I dunno, snarky hasn't really done anything that I noticed at all?
Tell me what opinions Snarky has had today (or even all game) and I'll say the opinions or involvement Riley has had today.In post 663, Rautherdir wrote:Okay so the both votes on power roles thing was a pretty bad reason to suspect you, but my first point on you still stands Riley...
It doesn't mean it's set in stone, it also doesn't explain Snarky's alignment.In post 665, Rautherdir wrote:Yeah, the only reason I chose to put Riley over Snarky was because Snarky's role explains the second night kill.
What was terrible about it? Did you think it was AtE?In post 669, TiphaineDeath wrote:Riley cake is terrible, and their last post is terrible and they should be lynched.
Sonia is also bad.
RAUTHERDIR AND TIPHAINESIES!! THEY'RE TRYING TA LYNCH ME JUST COS I'M NOT ACTIVE!!! THAT'S SCUMMY!!! JUST COS SOMEONE'S INACTIVE DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE SCUM!!! THEY COULD BE BUSYSIES!!!In post 666, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:Also Riley - Top 2 for Lynch? With reasons.