1 - How the hell does
448 contain no analysis? Everyone reading this read the post and judge for yourself. I'mm calling your bluff on this post Priscila. Quote this post, underline the summary, bold the analysis. Also tell me which players have analyzed the game up to your standards, since you clearly have a drastically different definition of it than me.
2 - Contradictions are noteworthy and can indicate that a player is not being genuine with their reasoning that they provide. If a player contradicts that same reasoning consistently, it is likely fabricated which could be a scumtell. I don't even know which questions you're referring to in the second point about "weakly alignment indicative questions". I pushed for fykus to provide his own reasoning, which he hadn't done much of early on, some type of content from Mislynch who was completely inactive, and provided a counterpoint towards your opinion on Sling. None of this fits your description.
3 - Onto my next two reads, which you describe as me exaggerating null behavior. Quote the post. Point out the null behaviors I'm exaggerating and why they don't make sense. I read their ISO's I wrote my opinions about them and what they made me think.
4 - Setting up second lynches is definitely not null behavior. I have a "tendency to do this to Rhazh" because Rhazh has a tendency to attempt to frame somebody else for lynches he has pushed. Naturally I called him on it both times. Now onto the "framing", which by the way nice choice of words to make it sound way different than what it was. I pointed out that Nero seems to be buddying Boon, which is a common scum/town thing. The funny thing is that in your description here you say I was shading both of them, but I clearly said that I believe that if anything it would be that Nero was scum and Boon was town. But clearly you didn't actually read my post so its whatever. The purpose is to point out a possible connection. The clear thing I've noticed here is that anything that I analyze, you write off as "exaggerating null behavior", "framing", or "shading" without giving it much thought.
5 - Mush went balls deep with catching up and delivered a pretty well put together read on several people. That's more contribution than several players had done the rest of the game. If you are going to call every one of my reads arbitrary despite me giving clear reasons for them, I'm going to have a hard time believing that you have any motive other than discrediting me. And again, pre-flip associatives are incredibly scummy because scum know who is town and who is mafia. If Rhazh is scum and knows mozamis is town, he can then say that if Mozamis flips town, Fykus is suspect for it and set Fykus up to be the next lynch.
6 - Oh look a post that I worked out with Rhazh that I was wrong about cool. Yes, I thought that that was Rhazh's way of dodging the question,
and Rhazh proved me wrong by telling me why he couldn't talk about it. You'd think somebody who hates "arbitrary reasoning" would want to know what "Meta related reasons. Can't say any more right now" means, but you're not actually concerned about arbitrary reasoning, you just use that to discredit reasoning you disagree with. As for my Zach read, if you looked at all of it rather than isolate individual responses, has been a tough one for me to sort. He feels like a frustrated townie in my opinion, but parts of what he says strike me as "maybe this is a scum player who is frustrated because he's being scumread for dumb reasons rather than because he's town". Quite frankly, I'm still figuring out Zach, and I have a lot stronger scumreads to pursue right now. Noted the "framing" of me as buddying him though - because that's what we call analyzing relationships in this conversation right? (In case you couldn't tell that was sarcasm. I fully understand trying to analyze the relationship - but guess what, I did that with Nero/Boon and you called it Framing.)
7 - Alright, so the fluff link was directed towards me actually getting information out of Frogger while you sat back screaming that he was scum right after he subbed in (which by the way, you criticized me for getting a town read on somebody right after they subbed in.) Wait hold up, this next one is gold. According to you, I'm shading Rhazh for his gut townread on Frogger immediately after subbing. But look at paragraph 5 of your case on me. You did the same thing to me about Mush, who had posted much more content by then, and I gave a reason, while Rhazh just did a gutread. Why is it shading when I do it, but analysis when you do? Exaggerating null behavior linked to me telling Rhazh that him not actively scumhunting and instead trying to buddy was suspicious. Both of these things are behaviors that you are calling suspicious from me, but you are fine with from Rhazh? Weak posturing questions led me to me asking questions for information. I don't think they're weak, but I guess that's a matter of opinion. I already defended the Nero/Boon stuff. And then I didn't even townread Frog - I just said I feel better, since I felt bad about the question dodging. And again though, you don't give a shit about Rhazh's instant gut townread on him.
8 - Mostly bullshit buzzwords to be honest. You say I haven't ruffled feathers, but I've probably been the most controversial player in this game,
and have ruffled most peoples feathers off and on. You say I've tunnelled Rhazh, but I've talked about other targets, questioned other people,
and stated which other targets I am willing to pursue. I stayed on Rhazh because he was my strongest lead, and now people are finally starting to take notice of it. And that last sentence - bullshit, you are doing nothing to sort here and this post makes that clear.
