You plurshifted
get your vote back on Rhazh now
You plurshifted
OhIn post 1367, Fro99er wrote:i'm not evne tunneling him. I townread himIn post 1363, WhyMafia wrote:On this I shall passIn post 1356, mush wrote:I suggested when I first came into the game to simply ignore tywin until he gets a guilty or dies. why don't we just do that.
View this as tunneling, from both sides, I am
he's just being terrible
LMAO, you had 158 of the first 659 posts that game...24%In post 1365, Boonskiies wrote:Also this game, I was similar as to how I was here. I didn't do much early in Day 1
LMAO, you had 158 of the first 659 posts that game...24%In post 1365, Boonskiies wrote:Also this game, I was similar as to how I was here. I didn't do much early in Day 1
VOTE: mushIn post 1376, mush wrote:don't we still have like 5 days to deadline? ill put my vote back on rhazh when whymafia stops purposely distracting from the game
pedit: thanks whymafia VOTE: rhazh
It's too lateIn post 1375, Gamma Emerald wrote:You plurshifted
get your vote back on Rhazh now
In post 970, mush wrote:well I disagree I think he's the scummiest player in the game right now. im comfortable with my vote.
In post 971, CptPicard wrote:Sorry guys, I've been too busy lately for three games. I'm going to replace out so you guys can get someone that's more active.
I have to say that mush is really coming across as ingenuine to me. I can't wait to see if I'm right.
Good luck everyone!
priscilla's points about cptpicard being bad made me second guess my read on him. then he replaced out. when someone replaces out with that little content i feel its fair to let the replacement come in and show us what he's got.In post 1382, Fro99er wrote:In post 970, mush wrote:well I disagree I think he's the scummiest player in the game right now. im comfortable with my vote.In post 971, CptPicard wrote:Sorry guys, I've been too busy lately for three games. I'm going to replace out so you guys can get someone that's more active.
I have to say that mush is really coming across as ingenuine to me. I can't wait to see if I'm right.
Good luck everyone!
mush can you explain the unvote there?
posting in bad grammar is better than having an ego competitionIn post 1383, mush wrote:gotta be honest, was not thinking about the whole plurality thing at all, just wanted whymafia to stop posting like that
Wait a second ....In post 1384, mush wrote:priscilla's points about cptpicard being bad made me second guess my read on him. then he replaced out. when someone replaces out with that little content i feel its fair to let the replacement come in and show us what he's got.In post 1382, Fro99er wrote:In post 970, mush wrote:well I disagree I think he's the scummiest player in the game right now. im comfortable with my vote.In post 971, CptPicard wrote:Sorry guys, I've been too busy lately for three games. I'm going to replace out so you guys can get someone that's more active.
I have to say that mush is really coming across as ingenuine to me. I can't wait to see if I'm right.
Good luck everyone!
mush can you explain the unvote there?
i felt there were better places to put my vote at the time then on an inactive slot which at this time is still without a replacementIn post 1386, WhyMafia wrote:Wait a second ....In post 1384, mush wrote:priscilla's points about cptpicard being bad made me second guess my read on him. then he replaced out. when someone replaces out with that little content i feel its fair to let the replacement come in and show us what he's got.In post 1382, Fro99er wrote:In post 970, mush wrote:well I disagree I think he's the scummiest player in the game right now. im comfortable with my vote.In post 971, CptPicard wrote:Sorry guys, I've been too busy lately for three games. I'm going to replace out so you guys can get someone that's more active.
I have to say that mush is really coming across as ingenuine to me. I can't wait to see if I'm right.
Good luck everyone!
mush can you explain the unvote there?
Cpt is in three other games? Then he should know the dangers of modkills and such
In addition, why unvote then though. Can't you just wait to see the replacement's posts first?
But you said you disagree and you thought he was the scummiest player in the game. 2 posts before.In post 1384, mush wrote:priscilla's points about cptpicard being bad made me second guess my read on him. then he replaced out. when someone replaces out with that little content i feel its fair to let the replacement come in and show us what he's got.
Funny, considering you started the insults by calling me a fucking idiotIn post 1351, Tywin Lannister wrote:He went for insults instead you say? That IS AI.
sorry, fucking moron, not fucking idiotIn post 1228, Tywin Lannister wrote:fucking moron
VOTE: rhazhIn post 1387, Gamma Emerald wrote:Fro99er pls vote Rhazh, if just for one post
I guess the replace really affected me. a couple of people had scumreads on my slot when i replaced in, and i wouldn't want to be judged or attacked the person i was replacing posting. I guess the unvote was just to give the replacement a chance, and the wagon wasnt gonna go anywhere while the mod searched for a replacement I don't think. So I voted a more viable scumread of mine, rhazh. dont want my vote to be wasted on something i cant get off the ground.In post 1389, Fro99er wrote:But you said you disagree and you thought he was the scummiest player in the game. 2 posts before.In post 1384, mush wrote:priscilla's points about cptpicard being bad made me second guess my read on him. then he replaced out. when someone replaces out with that little content i feel its fair to let the replacement come in and show us what he's got.
who caresIn post 1394, mush wrote:and i wouldn't want to be judged or attacked the person i was replacing posting.
if a slot replaces out early game, it is impossible for the replacement to defend, explain, or elaborate on earlier posts made by the slot. would you agree?In post 1395, Fro99er wrote:who caresIn post 1394, mush wrote:and i wouldn't want to be judged or attacked the person i was replacing posting.
this is way too self-aware
its certainly not pro-townIn post 1398, Fro99er wrote:why would you vote someone for "annoying posts"? Did you really think that was scum indicative?