In post 222, BTD6_maker wrote:What conclusions do you expect? At this point, anyone could be Town or scum. I have weak reads, but not much more. What I choose to analyse is arbitrary because I am rather busy and cannot analyse every post in depth.
Currently, you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.
In post 223, MarioManiac4 wrote:like, most of your posts are long and analyzing, but even though I see analysis, I don't see how it affects your reads. If you could post something like "you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.", I think that would help with trying to read you.
(Also, I'm pretty much confirmed town. )
Can you explain your Raya read? I have her as leaning Town, but one reason I had I realized was NAI and the other reason may be as well. I'd like to know if you're seeing something more substantial from her.
I did a double take, congrats, well played.
And mfw BTD6 has a weak scumread on the claimed FN
(inb4 it's JK setup and Mario is scum gambiting hard)
In post 223, MarioManiac4 wrote:like, most of your posts are long and analyzing, but even though I see analysis, I don't see how it affects your reads. If you could post something like "you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.", I think that would help with trying to read you.
(Also, I'm pretty much confirmed town. )
I was referring to your play rather than your claim.
You are near-confTown from your claim, but I got a weak scumread from your actual play.
"one of these days i'll read you correctly" - Transcend, Micro 714
In post 223, MarioManiac4 wrote:like, most of your posts are long and analyzing, but even though I see analysis, I don't see how it affects your reads. If you could post something like "you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.", I think that would help with trying to read you.
(Also, I'm pretty much confirmed town. )
I was referring to your play rather than your claim.
You are near-confTown from your claim, but I got a weak scumread from your actual play.
In post 223, MarioManiac4 wrote:like, most of your posts are long and analyzing, but even though I see analysis, I don't see how it affects your reads. If you could post something like "you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.", I think that would help with trying to read you.
(Also, I'm pretty much confirmed town. )
I was referring to your play rather than your claim.
You are near-confTown from your claim, but I got a weak scumread from your actual play.
With this post you receive the rare double-IGMEOU
Are you referring to BTD6 or MM4 with this post? (Or both?)
Now I'm an innocent child, like in Matrix6 with BP. And if Mafia choose to kill me tonight, the other PR gets another night. I don't think this game really solves the will to claim at all.
Now I will use my 99% towniness to direct y'all to vote Alchemist!
Why did you feel the need to claim at this point? I get that you want to pressure Alchemist but surely there are better ways to do that than to create a 50/50 chance that you're going to get NK'd on night 1 (Assuming that in the JK setup you get jailed).
I still think Flubber's scum. I had you as possible scum but was giving you a bit of a pass because I remember playing with you in the past and thinking you were a VI for some reason, and your play here is telling me that's still true.
In post 223, MarioManiac4 wrote:like, most of your posts are long and analyzing, but even though I see analysis, I don't see how it affects your reads. If you could post something like "you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.", I think that would help with trying to read you.
(Also, I'm pretty much confirmed town. )
I was referring to your play rather than your claim.
You are near-confTown from your claim, but I got a weak scumread from your actual play.
With this post you receive the rare double-IGMEOU
I was about to ask what the hell IGMEOU meant but then I say the emoji tag in the post and felt dumb
"just got my hands in cooking! feel free to give me suggestions. So far completed: noodle in soup, noodle stuffed clam over noodle, red white and bluedle american noodle, hot brown noodle"
In post 223, MarioManiac4 wrote:like, most of your posts are long and analyzing, but even though I see analysis, I don't see how it affects your reads. If you could post something like "you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.", I think that would help with trying to read you.
(Also, I'm pretty much confirmed town. )
I was referring to your play rather than your claim.
You are near-confTown from your claim, but I got a weak scumread from your actual play.
With this post you receive the rare double-IGMEOU
Are you referring to BTD6 or MM4 with this post? (Or both?)
In post 191, Alchemist21 wrote:We should all cast just cast naked votes the rest of the game. Then we'll definitely catch the scum, especially if all the votes are just one continuous string of reaction tests. /s
In post 193, MarioManiac4 wrote:on a more serious note; i don't like how alchemist is trying to "campaign" against blank votes; it feels like he's trying to look pro-town but I don't see the actual scumhunting there. there isn't much followup on his questions and his push on flubber has been stale for a while
also gut is a perfectly viable method
In post 222, BTD6_maker wrote:What conclusions do you expect? At this point, anyone could be Town or scum. I have weak reads, but not much more. What I choose to analyse is arbitrary because I am rather busy and cannot analyse every post in depth.
Currently, you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.
In post 223, MarioManiac4 wrote:like, most of your posts are long and analyzing, but even though I see analysis, I don't see how it affects your reads. If you could post something like "you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.", I think that would help with trying to read you.
(Also, I'm pretty much confirmed town. )
Can you explain your Raya read? I have her as leaning Town, but one reason I had I realized was NAI and the other reason may be as well. I'd like to know if you're seeing something more substantial from her.
I did a double take, congrats, well played.
And mfw BTD6 has a weak scumread on the claimed FN
(inb4 it's JK setup and Mario is scum gambiting hard)
Why are you both shunning and entertaining BTD's scum read?
Now I'm an innocent child, like in Matrix6 with BP. And if Mafia choose to kill me tonight, the other PR gets another night. I don't think this game really solves the will to claim at all.
Now I will use my 99% towniness to direct y'all to vote Alchemist!
Wat UNVOTE:
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 191, Alchemist21 wrote:We should all cast just cast naked votes the rest of the game. Then we'll definitely catch the scum, especially if all the votes are just one continuous string of reaction tests. /s
Tell me more about how I never explain my votes
Nobody's saying you only throw out naked votes, the issue was that the past 3 votes in the game were naked votes, coming from Mario, Danny, and then you.
)
