Large Normal 204: BooneyToonz III - Calling All Cryptids!END

Vedith · Post Post #2425 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:20 am

In post 2423, SlingshotWaffles wrote:I don't know.

You seem to be ignoring many parts of what I said though.

No I am focused on what you originally said, not what you changed it to when I called you out.

Tchill13 · Post Post #2426 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:20 am

Like I just town read Lexa and egg because they're doing towny stuff. Vedith's play throughout the game is the one that my thought process has seen a lot of similarity to.

Vedith · Post Post #2427 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:21 am

In post 2424, Tchill13 wrote:Who's scum out of me and you? I don't particularly believe you're scum and ik I'm not scum so that's just wasted effort. I noticed something and I pointed it out. If I'm scum at the moment I sit back and I don't rock the boat. Not gonna 1v1 you I don't believe youre scum. I just stated that I seen the mistake I made.

In all honesty I thought that debate was with WhyMafia

Vedith · Post Post #2428 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:22 am

In post 2426, Tchill13 wrote:Like I just town read Lexa and egg because they're doing towny stuff. Vedith's play throughout the game is the one that my thought process has seen a lot of similarity to.

Since I joined the game they haven't don't a great deal.
I'll give it benefit of the doubt that both are shy around me.

SlingshotWaffles · Post Post #2429 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:24 am

In post 2425, Vedith wrote:
In post 2423, SlingshotWaffles wrote:I don't know.

You seem to be ignoring many parts of what I said though.
No I am focused on what you originally said, not what you changed it to when I called you out.

Still then I said probably wouldn't.
Lore's claim makes me kinda eh, but they've been acting scummy enough imo.

Vedith · Post Post #2430 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:25 am

In post 2429, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 2425, Vedith wrote:
In post 2423, SlingshotWaffles wrote:I don't know.

You seem to be ignoring many parts of what I said though.
No I am focused on what you originally said, not what you changed it to when I called you out.
Still then I said probably wouldn't.
Lore's claim makes me kinda eh, but they've been acting scummy enough imo.

So I'm confused. Will you vote Lore or No?

SlingshotWaffles · Post Post #2431 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:26 am

In post 2430, Vedith wrote:
In post 2429, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 2425, Vedith wrote:
In post 2423, SlingshotWaffles wrote:I don't know.

You seem to be ignoring many parts of what I said though.
No I am focused on what you originally said, not what you changed it to when I called you out.
Still then I said probably wouldn't.
Lore's claim makes me kinda eh, but they've been acting scummy enough imo.
So I'm confused. Will you vote Lore or No?

Yes I will.

WhyMafia · Post Post #2432 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:26 am

In post 2259, Vedith wrote:
In post 2254, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think Lore is at L-2 or something
And the fact that she refuses to vote WhyMafia makes me believe that she's associated with him.

Tchill13 · Post Post #2433 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:27 am

No they haven't. Egg keeps posting about irl work but Lexa hasn't done too much. Transcend is town to me I'm still pretty firm on that. Ginngie talked about a "town throw down" then dissappeared... Lynching lore is okay with me. Sling needs to stop dancing around the pr claim.

WhyMafia · Post Post #2434 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:27 am

I can vote Lore, but I am still extremely wary of Vedith

Vedith · Post Post #2435 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:27 am

Well that's good at least.
Just means we can work on lynching you tomorrow instead of today!

Lapsa · Post Post #2436 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:28 am

VOTE: Vedith

Vedith · Post Post #2437 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:28 am

In post 2432, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 2259, Vedith wrote:
In post 2254, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think Lore is at L-2 or something
And the fact that she refuses to vote WhyMafia makes me believe that she's associated with him.

Where does it say that I Scum read Lore because she won't vote you?
That was your argument, right?

Vedith · Post Post #2438 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:29 am

In post 2434, WhyMafia wrote:I can vote Lore, but I am still extremely wary of Vedith

You opportunist fuck.

Tchill13 · Post Post #2439 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:29 am

Vedith do you still that that's an association issue or just lore trying to get town cred for not voting whymafia?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2440 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:29 am

In post 2413, Vedith wrote:
In post 2410, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2400, Transcend wrote:Scum fake claim all the time (you literally were the recipient of a bus in my fake claim). Claiming pr, does in fact, not clear anyone.
That was a planned fakeclaim.
I don't see Lore fakeclaiming vig as scum, not to mention n1 vig.
Why not?

1) if there's a vig they're fucked unless they're BP (I added the BP part because I remembered being mafia oneshot BP in Mini 1911 and considering claiming vig if run up.)
2) if there's no vig kill it's hard to explain, especially since n1 is the only chance to shoot

WhyMafia · Post Post #2441 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:29 am

In post 2419, Tchill13 wrote:Whymafia several people said you're scummy even though there's no wagon on you yet. I agree that whymafia is scummy.

LOL

So far the only case has been
"Blending in" which was really early by Egg
and
"Opportunistic scum votes" by Vedith
Like God at least tell give reasons for a scum read

Vedith · Post Post #2442 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:29 am

In post 2436, Lapsa wrote:VOTE: Vedith

I'm day 2 IC.

Vedith · Post Post #2443 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:30 am

In post 2439, Tchill13 wrote:Vedith do you still that that's an association issue or just lore trying to get town cred for not voting whymafia?

WhyMafia is Scum.
If Lore is Scum which I highly believe then yes it is an association.

WhyMafia · Post Post #2444 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:30 am

In post 2438, Vedith wrote:
In post 2434, WhyMafia wrote:I can vote Lore, but I am still extremely wary of Vedith
You opportunist fuck.

LOL
Once again
Keep on parroting yourself Vedith, go ahead

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2445 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:30 am

In post 2418, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 2411, Vedith wrote: But that's not what you said...
You never said about the claim itself you said because it was a PR claim.
If it's a PR claim D1 I probably wouldn't vote.
It depends on the claim and the player though.

Would you lynch if the play didn't match the claim?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2446 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:32 am

Vedith's new avatar reduces the amount of arrogance I see in his posts for some reason

Tchill13 · Post Post #2447 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:32 am

I love how I disagree with the IC so strongly. I shouldn't expect anything different now. I claim I town read vedith and bam he naked votes him lol.

Vedith I can see your point there. It's by default an association issue if they're both scum. Of course I'd vote my scum partner to distance but that's a play style thing I guess.

Vedith · Post Post #2448 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:32 am

In post 2440, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2413, Vedith wrote:
In post 2410, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2400, Transcend wrote:Scum fake claim all the time (you literally were the recipient of a bus in my fake claim). Claiming pr, does in fact, not clear anyone.
That was a planned fakeclaim.
I don't see Lore fakeclaiming vig as scum, not to mention n1 vig.
Why not?
1) if there's a vig they're fucked unless they're BP (I added the BP part because I remembered being mafia oneshot BP in Mini 1911 and considering claiming vig if run up.)
2) if there's no vig kill it's hard to explain, especially since n1 is the only chance to shoot

They are also fucked if they are lynched.
Scum try to survive that little longer and lynch a town.
It's not hard to explain they claim Roleblock and then people like you buy it.

The only thing I semi agree with here is that vig isn't as much of a benefit claim as say doc / cop etc

WhyMafia · Post Post #2449 (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:32 am

In post 2443, Vedith wrote:
In post 2439, Tchill13 wrote:Vedith do you still that that's an association issue or just lore trying to get town cred for not voting whymafia?
WhyMafia is Scum.
If Lore is Scum which I highly believe then yes it is an association.

Go ahead!
Even if she is scum (which I must concur on y'all on this), you're using baseless associations.
A) A lack of voting me is not indicative. I was not the counter wagon
B) That is completely WIFOM
Why? Because she is simply throwing suspicions on me, resulting as a mis-lynch
By God, I just think you are tunneling me