hahaha that's because you're forcedly trying to shade himIn post 272, Bomberman wrote:Not how I took it, seemed like a loaded question
such bullshit
hahaha that's because you're forcedly trying to shade himIn post 272, Bomberman wrote:Not how I took it, seemed like a loaded question
I guess. but it was pretty obvious I was more upset about you derailing the TwoFace wagon and your lack of conviction about your voting preference (null vs scum) for this phase.In post 273, jjh927 wrote:Yeah, was a conceivable possibility though.
He never said thatIn post 276, Bomberman wrote:What even point was there to vote me if he's just going to fallback and say 'lol i have nothin it's d1 bro'
Hope my recent tone is more indicative that I am being seriousIn post 280, Varsoon wrote:@Bomberman: So you were mostly giving Havo a hard time for being on you for dumb reasons?
Also, 'someone of [my] stature'?
I do see that you employ a playful tone with the whole breaking from it for joking melodrama, but that really doesn't do much for the gamestate, homie.
I paraphrased my interpretation, hence not "quoted"In post 279, Fro99er wrote:He never said thatIn post 276, Bomberman wrote:What even point was there to vote me if he's just going to fallback and say 'lol i have nothin it's d1 bro'
In post 251, jjh927 wrote:Nope, I voted you because your conviction was shitty, your reaction was shittier, and your explanation of the reaction was extremely shitty.
And then your reaction to my vote was exactly what I was looking for to keep my vote on you.
No.
but twoface said they'd happily self voteIn post 290, Varsoon wrote:If you're going to give shit to Bomber for playing the "Vote me, I don't mind flipping IC" card without self voting, you can apply the same metric to Twoface when they played similarly.
right, but now he's given other reasons, so why do you keep harping on "it's D1 bro"In post 291, Bomberman wrote:Not the post I'm talking about? #266 where he says "we don't have a lot of substantial stuff to go off of"
Yeah, that's me saying your reaction was a massive overreaction, which is itself something I consider fairly substantial to go off. Especially for day 1.In post 291, Bomberman wrote:Not the post I'm talking about? #266 where he says "we don't have a lot of substantial stuff to go off of"
plus this wasIn post 266, jjh927 wrote:Bomberman, this is the first phase of the whole game. We don't have a lot of substantial stuff to go off and you acted like me voting you was me accusing you of being the antichrist.
In post 274, Varsoon wrote:MOD:What happens if we do not reach a majority vote by the deadline during the REVEAL and/or FLIP phases?
In post 38, Varsoon wrote:MOD: Is it safe to assume that colors can change or is that not public information?
What purpose is there to vote someone if you're just going to take it back, what exactly were you trying to feel out?In post 289, jjh927 wrote:No, Bomberman. I'm saying you shouldn't take day 1 votes as "This person is scum and I have loads of evidence". I like throwing my vote around a lot for reactions and your reactions to people voting you or being suspicious of you have been terrible.
If you think that is the ONLY thing I have harped on him for maybe I'm not being clear enoughFro99er wrote:right, but now he's given other reasons, so why do you keep harping on "it's D1 bro"