Open 688: Diffusion of Power (Game Over)

NotTheRealPaul · Post Post #1250 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:28 pm

In post 1248, MuttonChopMagic wrote:you not lol
you paul

wut

Vedith · Post Post #1251 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:29 pm

In post 1245, NotTheRealPaul wrote:I lol

NotTheRealPaul · Post Post #1252 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:31 pm

wait did MCM make a joke?

Im confused again

Cooperative Sheep · Post Post #1253 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:33 pm

In post 1231, Titus wrote:
In post 1225, Cooperative Sheep wrote:What did you believe specifically?
It's in my ISO.

I believed Mutton might have been covering for Hellfire on first pass.

Your belief =/= reality. No one's does.

*shrug*

If you only thought it was scummy as a defense for Hellfire why switch votes, wouldn't that belief require Hellfire to be scum, and Hellfire has the benefit of being independently scummy moreso than Mutton?

Titus · Post Post #1254 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:37 pm

In post 1253, Cooperative Sheep wrote:
In post 1231, Titus wrote:
In post 1225, Cooperative Sheep wrote:What did you believe specifically?
It's in my ISO.

I believed Mutton might have been covering for Hellfire on first pass.

Your belief =/= reality. No one's does.

*shrug*
If you only thought it was scummy as a defense for Hellfire why switch votes, wouldn't that belief require Hellfire to be scum, and Hellfire has the benefit of being independently scummy moreso than Mutton?

Doc lynch is 100% optimal today because their must be scum in the doctor claimers. There's no guarantee of scum in cop claimers.

NotTheRealPaul · Post Post #1255 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:39 pm

The doc claims being coop, alban, sparkles, sesq, and who else? I forgot who claimed what tbh.

Titus · Post Post #1256 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:46 pm

Creature cop
Sesq n3 doc
Hellfire Missile cop
Agent Sparkles n1 doc
NJAC cop
Gamma Emerald cop
Titus doc
Cooperative Sheep n1 doc
alban n1 doc
Vedith cop
NotTheRealPaul cop
MuttonChopMagic cop, changed to doc
CommKnight dead doc

7 docs, 6 cops

Max 6 of each in setup

Hellfire Missile · Post Post #1257 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 2:22 pm

In post 1242, Vedith wrote:What part?
Can you explain why a bit more?

In post 1243, Sesq wrote:his entire play is an act that has, as my patience, worn thin

VOTE: paul

i died a little on the inside

Agent Sparkles · Post Post #1258 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:06 pm

In post 1257, Hellfire Missile wrote:
In post 1242, Vedith wrote:What part?
Can you explain why a bit more?

In post 1243, Sesq wrote:his entire play is an act that has, as my patience, worn thin

VOTE: paul

i died a little on the inside

What do you think of the gamestate? Is there anyone besides Sesq you want lynched? I still have almost no clue what you're thinking right now.

Agent Sparkles · Post Post #1259 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:19 pm

Are people willing to consider a Gamma wagon? If we're sniping from doctor claims, I want him dead tomorrow.

VOTE: MuttonChop if this is still possible. Not lynching docs outside of this and Sesq.

Sesq · Post Post #1260 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:33 pm

In post 1244, Vedith wrote:Can you give examples?

literally every post he has made sounds stilted, unnatural, and foreplanned

this is not a town slot

NotTheRealPaul · Post Post #1261 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:52 pm

Lol at how dead wrong Sesq is. I will say I do often erase what I type to try to make it flow a bit better/avoid confusion. Like I rewrote this 2-3 times trying to fit a joke but alas the creative portion of my mind is not at full power and I was unable to come up with anything good.

@Titus thank you for the list oh so very helpful.

NotTheRealPaul · Post Post #1262 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:56 pm

In post 1259, Agent Sparkles wrote:Are people willing to consider a Gamma wagon? If we're sniping from doctor claims, I want him dead tomorrow.

VOTE: MuttonChop if this is still possible. Not lynching docs outside of this and Sesq.

I'll consider a Gamma wagon. Make your case.

Not so happy with an MCM wagon though.

Titus · Post Post #1263 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 6:02 pm

In post 1259, Agent Sparkles wrote:Are people willing to consider a Gamma wagon? If we're sniping from doctor claims, I want him dead tomorrow.

VOTE: MuttonChop if this is still possible. Not lynching docs outside of this and Sesq.

Just Sesq man come on.

NotTheRealPaul · Post Post #1264 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 6:05 pm

Im actually thinking of lynching someone in D1 doc claims but not sure who. Alban prob not, but Coop and Sparkles havent pinged me at all either. The thing is if it is a mislynch at the very least we dont lose a doc ability for future. That said, Im fine with a Sesq lynch and open to Gamma if someone puts out a solid case

Sesq · Post Post #1265 (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 6:14 pm

In post 1261, NotTheRealPaul wrote:Lol at how dead wrong Sesq is. I will say I do often erase what I type to try to make it flow a bit better/avoid confusion. Like I rewrote this 2-3 times trying to fit a joke but alas the creative portion of my mind is not at full power and I was unable to come up with anything good.

@Titus thank you for the list oh so very helpful.

lollllll

you're only proving my point

Cooperative Sheep · Post Post #1266 (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 12:41 am

In post 1254, Titus wrote:Doc lynch is 100% optimal today because their must be scum in the doctor claimers. There's no guarantee of scum in cop claimers.

I understand the broad stroke Doc lynch choice. I'm working on your specific mental state when voting Mutton.

So a roughly honest translation of your thoughts would be the following; 'The only reason scum Mutton would move is to protect scum Hellfire - but since statistically scum are more likely to be in Docs I need to pressure Mutton, not Hellfire, and I'd like to make him explain his reasoning.'

In post 1259, Agent Sparkles wrote:Are people willing to consider a Gamma wagon? If we're sniping from doctor claims, I want him dead tomorrow.

VOTE: MuttonChop if this is still possible. Not lynching docs outside of this and Sesq.

So you want to know if people would consider Gamma (my answer is no) but want to vote Mutton (whom at least two players are calling town) or Sesq?
The Sesq case has mostly been invented by the people opposing Mutton as a lynch - why do you agree on that and disgaree on the other (especially as the two thoughts are somewhat connected).

Also, where does Gamma fall on your lynch preferences? Is he a third choice, or a second choice, or a first choice?

Cooperative Sheep · Post Post #1267 (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 12:42 am

In post 1265, Sesq wrote:
In post 1261, NotTheRealPaul wrote:Lol at how dead wrong Sesq is. I will say I do often erase what I type to try to make it flow a bit better/avoid confusion. Like I rewrote this 2-3 times trying to fit a joke but alas the creative portion of my mind is not at full power and I was unable to come up with anything good.

@Titus thank you for the list oh so very helpful.
lollllll

you're only proving my point

He has specifically proved your point.

How does that make him scum exactly?

Titus · Post Post #1268 (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:21 am

In post 1266, Cooperative Sheep wrote:I understand the broad stroke Doc lynch choice. I'm working on your specific mental state when voting Mutton.

So a roughly honest translation of your thoughts would be the following; 'The only reason scum Mutton would move is to protect scum Hellfire - but since statistically scum are more likely to be in Docs I need to pressure Mutton, not Hellfire, and I'd like to make him explain his reasoning.'

Yes.

Titus · Post Post #1269 (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:21 am

I take quibble with the word only but yes.

Cooperative Sheep · Post Post #1270 (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:26 am

Did you have other reasons?
I used 'only' because of your comment here - viewtopic.php?p=9318886#p9318886

Vedith · Post Post #1271 (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:39 am

If you do [.post]1231[/post] removing the "." it will link better.

1231

Cooperative Sheep · Post Post #1272 (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:43 am

I never quite made a lot of the updates when they added them, it's why I still vote in bold as opposed to vote tags also.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1273 (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 6:58 am

In post 1195, Titus wrote:Hey can we lynch Sesq now? She's not doing anything this game.

Then tomorrow maybe Hellfire.

I'd rather lynch AS when I have someone who can see what I see in the game

Sesq · Post Post #1274 (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 7:06 am

In post 1267, Cooperative Sheep wrote:
In post 1265, Sesq wrote:
In post 1261, NotTheRealPaul wrote:Lol at how dead wrong Sesq is. I will say I do often erase what I type to try to make it flow a bit better/avoid confusion. Like I rewrote this 2-3 times trying to fit a joke but alas the creative portion of my mind is not at full power and I was unable to come up with anything good.

@Titus thank you for the list oh so very helpful.
lollllll

you're only proving my point
He has specifically proved your point.

How does that make him scum exactly?

my point is that he is scum and his entire play has been a lie.