Youre talking about post number 40, the beginning of the day when I made shit loads of shit posts. Not a valid argument.In post 595, Mulch wrote:In post 593, Sergtacos wrote:I don't get your purpose of this?In post 592, Mulch wrote:This is the Wolfy post I saw on page 2 that made me vote youIn post 497, Mulch wrote:Wolfy catch upIn post 40, Sergtacos wrote:Ok so here is what I see
Klazam- Lurking????
Carcalilly defending Mulch
Empiricus defending TwoFace
Mulch possibility of bussing TwoFace
Reason
Mini Normal 1919: Endgame
-
-
Sergtacos Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: May 9, 2017
-
-
Sergtacos Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: May 9, 2017
In post 600, Sergtacos wrote:
Youre talking about post number 40, the beginning of the day when I made shit loads of shit posts. Not a valid argument.In post 595, Mulch wrote:In post 593, Sergtacos wrote:
I don't get your purpose of this?In post 592, Mulch wrote:
This is the Wolfy post I saw on page 2 that made me vote youIn post 497, Mulch wrote:
Wolfy catch upIn post 40, Sergtacos wrote:Ok so here is what I see
Klazam- Lurking????
Carcalilly defending Mulch
Empiricus defending TwoFace
Mulch possibility of bussing TwoFace
Reason
Forgot to add, that post I was joking-
-
Mulch Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: April 23, 2017
-
-
Mulch Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: April 23, 2017
I am heavily scumreading that non confrontational and link bonding post by doodles so idk what you are smokingIn post 599, Carcalilly wrote:
They at least stated the stance of their opinion and how they agreed with everyone else, and added their own insight too.In post 596, Mulch wrote:
In what way is that good at all from doodles? LmaoIn post 594, Carcalilly wrote:
Doodles' gave a decent reasonIn post 488, Dunkerdoodles wrote:Ok I don't like those responses from tacos, kinda seems like he's telling everyone to lynch him so he won't get lynched, reverse psychology. Everyone else has valid points against taco too, so I'm willing to vote him rn.
And Mulch is just like
Unlike...-
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
early on I had a gut feeling on you, taco later summed it up perfectly and I agreed with him. You try to seem town and it doesn't feel natural. then you made your huge "case" and dropped a vote and the entire thing seemed forced and the reasons haven't been very good. I don't like the way you are dancing around this taco pressure. It feels to me like you know he is going to flip town. I think the straw that broke the camel's back was when you said there would only be a con to lynching taco if he was some sort of PR. Losing any townie is a con. Losing an active member of the game is a HUGE con. Even if he does spam post a lot that doesn't mean he is detrimental to the game.In post 598, Carcalilly wrote:His scum read on me seems consistent but I couldn't find a reason why in any of his posts...-
-
Mulch Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: April 23, 2017
This is A+++ analysis tbhIn post 604, TwoFace wrote:
early on I had a gut feeling on you, taco later summed it up perfectly and I agreed with him. You try to seem town and it doesn't feel natural. then you made your huge "case" and dropped a vote and the entire thing seemed forced and the reasons haven't been very good. I don't like the way you are dancing around this taco pressure. It feels to me like you know he is going to flip town. I think the straw that broke the camel's back was when you said there would only be a con to lynching taco if he was some sort of PR. Losing any townie is a con. Losing an active member of the game is a HUGE con. Even if he does spam post a lot that doesn't mean he is detrimental to the game.In post 598, Carcalilly wrote:His scum read on me seems consistent but I couldn't find a reason why in any of his posts...
VOTE: Carcalilly-
-
Mulch Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: April 23, 2017
-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
I know exactly what type of player serg is, and I also know that it's the easies mislynch in the world. Why are you and Carcalilly claiming we can get anything out of his reads afterwards if he's town? Scum are the only ones who know alignments for sure, so lynching scum shows us much, much more about the game than lynching town would. Sure he's posted a lot, but like 80% of it is joke posting.In post 543, shuffleplay wrote:In post 498, Trivium wrote: And I know I've said this a few times already, but I dislike the taco votes and Dunker's vote seems of the opportune.
@Trivium or anyone else really, could you explain to me the cons of lynching Sergtacos today? Obvious pro is if he is scum, we hit scum on D1. A lot of his posts have pinged me, especially the way he flip flops constantly (see above lol) I also like the read someone gave based on his previous game, saying that he did not sound the same. I'll verify that and read his existing meta when I get a second.
I understand that it could possibly be scum trying to push an easy mislynch maybe, but even if Serg is town, his flip would reveal a lot of information I feel like. Since he has been posting SO MUCH, it would be easy to go back after his flip and analyze his voting, who he was scumreading etc.
Also tbh I haven't properly caught up with the game since I last posted, I'll do that after work today, but just wanted to ask this Q first
I don't want to come off as having some kind of better opinion than anyone else, but I've lurked a long time on this site, and I've read through a metric ton of games. My main point here is that whenever there's one player who jokes around and posts more than any other player, basically doing exactly what serg is doing now,nearly every single gamethat person is lynched and they flip town. I see a pattern, and I want to break it to win.That's so meta-
-
Carcalilly She/HerMafia ScumShe/Her
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: August 15, 2015
- Pronoun: She/Her
Thank youIn post 604, TwoFace wrote:
early on I had a gut feeling on you, taco later summed it up perfectly and I agreed with him. You try to seem town and it doesn't feel natural. then you made your huge "case" and dropped a vote and the entire thing seemed forced and the reasons haven't been very good. I don't like the way you are dancing around this taco pressure. It feels to me like you know he is going to flip town. I think the straw that broke the camel's back was when you said there would only be a con to lynching taco if he was some sort of PR. Losing any townie is a con. Losing an active member of the game is a HUGE con. Even if he does spam post a lot that doesn't mean he is detrimental to the game.In post 598, Carcalilly wrote:His scum read on me seems consistent but I couldn't find a reason why in any of his posts...
Tbh I'm feeling the sting from my first newbie game right now so lemmie explain.
I know that loosing Town is a con in general. But compared to the loss of other members of they were to flip town would be more detrimental in my opinion. So, comparitvley speaking, its not a con to me.
To play Mafia, people will be lynched. There should be no protecting or denying that. My first game, I was so focused on not lynching town that it totally screwed up the game.
OK, there's no use for me to respond to the forced accusation since I can't change your opinions anyway. Near the beginning of the game I was trying to get a roll going, though, if that make sense."don't be carcasilly" -RadiantCowbells-
-
ThinkBig Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5530
- Joined: September 11, 2016
-
-
Mulch Gotta Go Fast
-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
No, I was trying to backtrack. My thought process is what I put in the posts.In post 525, Branson wrote:In post 461, Trivium wrote:Sorry, twitch reaction. Not omgus, I guess taco's been reading into carcalilly for some time now. Still.
Like, I don't understand what your thought process is here.In post 462, Trivium wrote:
But it might be a little bit omgus.In post 461, Trivium wrote:Sorry, twitch reaction. Not omgus, I guess taco's been reading into carcalilly for some time now. Still.
Why did you need to justify yourself here? This reads like you panicking and trying to backtrack while not looking like you're backtracking.That's so meta-
-
Carcalilly She/HerMafia ScumShe/Her
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: August 15, 2015
- Pronoun: She/Her
Are you always this blatant?In post 606, Mulch wrote:I'm just gonna sheep twoface on that one because that is amazing"don't be carcasilly" -RadiantCowbells-
-
Mulch Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: April 23, 2017
-
-
Mulch Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: April 23, 2017
Yes, hiding things is what scum does, pal.In post 613, Carcalilly wrote:
Are you always this blatant?In post 606, Mulch wrote:I'm just gonna sheep twoface on that one because that is amazing-
-
Sergtacos Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: May 9, 2017
In post 600, Sergtacos wrote:
Youre talking about post number 40, the beginning of the day when I made shit loads of shit posts. Not a valid argument.In post 595, Mulch wrote:In post 593, Sergtacos wrote:
I don't get your purpose of this?In post 592, Mulch wrote:
This is the Wolfy post I saw on page 2 that made me vote youIn post 497, Mulch wrote:
Wolfy catch upIn post 40, Sergtacos wrote:Ok so here is what I see
Klazam- Lurking????
Carcalilly defending Mulch
Empiricus defending TwoFace
Mulch possibility of bussing TwoFace
Reason
Your words and your behavior.In post 614, Mulch wrote:How can you scumread someone that's literally only read to page 2-
-
Mulch Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: April 23, 2017
-
-
Trivium Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: July 22, 2015
I agree with all of this except for the thing about her saying there's only a con if taco is a pr, I can see someone saying that town or scum, even if I disagree with it. Reading over Carcalilly's iso, scumleaning her.In post 604, TwoFace wrote:
early on I had a gut feeling on you, taco later summed it up perfectly and I agreed with him. You try to seem town and it doesn't feel natural. then you made your huge "case" and dropped a vote and the entire thing seemed forced and the reasons haven't been very good. I don't like the way you are dancing around this taco pressure. It feels to me like you know he is going to flip town. I think the straw that broke the camel's back was when you said there would only be a con to lynching taco if he was some sort of PR. Losing any townie is a con. Losing an active member of the game is a HUGE con. Even if he does spam post a lot that doesn't mean he is detrimental to the game.In post 598, Carcalilly wrote:His scum read on me seems consistent but I couldn't find a reason why in any of his posts...That's so meta-
-
Sergtacos Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: May 9, 2017
Because omgus lolIn post 617, Mulch wrote:Considering your scumread is wrong, it makes me wannna vote you
You already voted for me so I don't see why you can't vote me again-
-
Mulch Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Gotta Go Fast
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: April 23, 2017
I unvoted you, but u make me wanna vote you againIn post 619, Sergtacos wrote:
Because omgus lolIn post 617, Mulch wrote:Considering your scumread is wrong, it makes me wannna vote you
You already voted for me so I don't see why you can't vote me again-
-
Carcalilly She/HerMafia ScumShe/Her
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: August 15, 2015
- Pronoun: She/Her
-
-
Sergtacos Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: May 9, 2017
All because I voted you? You feel hurt? Scum alert? (Hey that rhymed!)In post 620, Mulch wrote:
I unvoted you, but u make me wanna vote you againIn post 619, Sergtacos wrote:
Because omgus lolIn post 617, Mulch wrote:Considering your scumread is wrong, it makes me wannna vote you
You already voted for me so I don't see why you can't vote me again
You seem scummy to me at the moment so take it easy, I mean I got more votes on my head than you xD-
-
Carcalilly She/HerMafia ScumShe/Her
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: August 15, 2015
- Pronoun: She/Her
-
-
Carcalilly She/HerMafia ScumShe/Her
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: August 15, 2015
- Pronoun: She/Her
I rly don't like this post. It sounds backlashy in a bad way.In post 617, Mulch wrote:Considering your scumread is wrong, it makes me wannna vote you"don't be carcasilly" -RadiantCowbells
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.