Mini Normal 1919: Endgame

[Mulch]

Imply you have actually reason that carcalilly might be scum. Point out you're read on klazam has no real evidence just a "sense" from you... That doesn't look too good in my opinion. You're basically saying if carcalilly is scum that's fine but he's not getting attention until day 2.

Who cares?

[Mulch]

I think dueling wagons for carcalilly and twoface wouldn't be a terrible idea? Not sure who'd agree though.

[Mulch]

Twoface your overreaction on mulch wasn't enough to out right scum read you but it's worth keeping in mind.

Uhhhh

[Mulch]

Taco you're doing me a concern ^

How?

I'm aware that I'm tunneling but you're the only one with enough posts to make something solid out of so...
This is about you,

Sergtaco

~ Also threw in a little bit of advice in there because why not

Topic: Klazam Suspicion

23- RVS vote
40- Saying that they're lurking??? (IMO: He's mentioned it many times with Klazam, yet, he hasn't mentioned anyone else who's lurking.)
60- Possible explanation as to why he's getting at them. ("Fight me"?)
124- A vote and scum read without evidence. (Low-key red flag )

IMO: Could this be a scum bussing attempt? Are you trying to get at Klazam? Why be persistent on it, especially with that vote in their absence? They have

one RVS post

.

Topic: Scumhunting

53- Initial show of strong opinions on scumhunting
63- He doesn't "believe in scumhunting" (IMO: It's a reasonable belief. However... keep reading)

IMO: You can consider scumhunting as NAI, but please don't emphasize being against it, as it can be discouraging. We want people to scumhunt, town or scum, because it STILL reveals information. Also, maybe focus on the

results.

This post is a highlight of my results, talking and questioning you was the hunting, for example.

Topic: Lightheartedness

!Now, I don't have anything against lightheartedness, but I just wanted to take this into account.!
IMO: Your posts have been very lighthearted, and I honestly enjoy talking to you because of that. However, I'm not going to ignore possible alt motives.
-I know that posting lightness can help emotionally when you are feeling heavy or guilty. Do you anything to feel guilty about, Taco?
-Provides distraction, keeps the game from moving forward.
-Appeal to emotion. Act friendly and get on people's good side.

Topic: Self Defense

A quick thing, but when I question him, he tends to turn it back against me.
84- A vote after a clash of opinions.
127- I'm suspicious of someone, and I'm "just saying that to look town"? Don't turn to that, that's a very easy and typical defense.

Defend. Yourself.

VOTE: Sergtacos
For now.

Anyway... someone else please come it. I don't like tunnel battles.

What the actual fuck is this? Is this the worst possible attempt at scumreading someone I have ever seen in my life?

That's not nice, she was trying.

From the posts you made and the effort you had about reading really makes me believe you're scum.

VOTE: Mulch

Not nice does not equal scum.

[Carcalilly]

Same with mine!! Thats why I said I still feel hurt.


You already have havent you? xD kidding, sure? shoot?

I really learned my lesson there.
Lynched Day1 pffft.

I have, but I have more! >=D

I can agree that scum hunting is not primarily alightment-indicative. Though, would you lynch someone who is actively Scum hunting? Why or why Not? What other ways could you effectivly look for scum- red flags, Process of elimination?

Wolfy af. No actualy analysis. Trying to look like they are doing something.

Bruh, that was to get the pressure going. I had like, nothing to go off of.

[Mulch]

Note to self: Stopped at page 9.

Sergetacos EASY town read.

[Branson]

Taco you're doing me a concern ^

How?

I'm aware that I'm tunneling but you're the only one with enough posts to make something solid out of so...
This is about you,

Sergtaco

~ Also threw in a little bit of advice in there because why not

Topic: Klazam Suspicion

23- RVS vote
40- Saying that they're lurking??? (IMO: He's mentioned it many times with Klazam, yet, he hasn't mentioned anyone else who's lurking.)
60- Possible explanation as to why he's getting at them. ("Fight me"?)
124- A vote and scum read without evidence. (Low-key red flag )

IMO: Could this be a scum bussing attempt? Are you trying to get at Klazam? Why be persistent on it, especially with that vote in their absence? They have

one RVS post

.

Topic: Scumhunting

53- Initial show of strong opinions on scumhunting
63- He doesn't "believe in scumhunting" (IMO: It's a reasonable belief. However... keep reading)

IMO: You can consider scumhunting as NAI, but please don't emphasize being against it, as it can be discouraging. We want people to scumhunt, town or scum, because it STILL reveals information. Also, maybe focus on the

results.

This post is a highlight of my results, talking and questioning you was the hunting, for example.

Topic: Lightheartedness

!Now, I don't have anything against lightheartedness, but I just wanted to take this into account.!
IMO: Your posts have been very lighthearted, and I honestly enjoy talking to you because of that. However, I'm not going to ignore possible alt motives.
-I know that posting lightness can help emotionally when you are feeling heavy or guilty. Do you anything to feel guilty about, Taco?
-Provides distraction, keeps the game from moving forward.
-Appeal to emotion. Act friendly and get on people's good side.

Topic: Self Defense

A quick thing, but when I question him, he tends to turn it back against me.
84- A vote after a clash of opinions.
127- I'm suspicious of someone, and I'm "just saying that to look town"? Don't turn to that, that's a very easy and typical defense.

Defend. Yourself.

VOTE: Sergtacos
For now.

Anyway... someone else please come it. I don't like tunnel battles.

What the actual fuck is this? Is this the worst possible attempt at scumreading someone I have ever seen in my life?

Welcome to my strongtown list.

[Carcalilly]

HYPE IM READY 2 FITE

[Carcalilly]

Hello everybody!

VOTE: Tchill13

Howdy!

And... Why.

Why you asking all dem questions? This to me appeal to be a scummy behavior actually.

GUYS GUYS I THINK I FOUND A SCUM.

Because questions put pressure. You're doing it right.
Pressure is frickin' awesome.

Oh, you know, just asking to get responses and analysis from people... So, you know, we can find scum and help town...

Horrible use of the same emoji 2X in a row. SCum flail at what to say and go back to confomrt. Oh, and they talk about scumreading without doing any themselves. BAD.

That's my face practically when saying that line. You can tell itd be said rather sassily. But I fail at that, so, meh.

[Carcalilly]

Same with mine!! Thats why I said I still feel hurt.


You already have havent you? xD kidding, sure? shoot?

I really learned my lesson there.
Lynched Day1 pffft.

I have, but I have more! >=D

I can agree that scum hunting is not primarily alightment-indicative. Though, would you lynch someone who is actively Scum hunting? Why or why Not? What other ways could you effectivly look for scum- red flags, Process of elimination?

Wolfy af. No actualy analysis. Trying to look like they are doing something.

I like to ask questions now, analyze later.

[Carcalilly]

How DID you figure it out? Was it really all gut-based?
Also, to win a majority favor, you'll probably need solid evidence. You could know exactly who scum is but without convincing... Ya gonna loose. ;_;

(Also, it's clear that I like Vaporeon, but my favorite has to be Raichu.)

Why are you talking about this, quwationing, doing random things, but not doing any analysis yourself?

I'm curious is one.
Also, game theory is always nice to talk about. Everyone's take on the game can be different, and I don't wanna judge incorrectly on that.

[Carcalilly]

This game is already giving me headaches. :/

I play this game for the headaches.
Why do we subject ourselfs to these things?

Why are you keep saying random things like this that don't help at all?

So you're gonna point me out on that and not anyone else... Kk, thanks...

[Carcalilly]

I'm going to have to restructure my reads solely just from how utterly bad that case is.

Bad. Town just does it, you have to annouce WHY you are changing something. That is wolfy.

Or I'm showing emphasis on how much of an effect that case has on how I view the game.

I thought that was obvious.

Kinda a good thing so ayy?

[Tchill13]

VOTE: Carcalilly

So mulch is town, Branson is town too.

[Carcalilly]

VOTE: mulch

Every game I've played the 1st post has always been "good morning literally"

Bad. Easy push on me. 1) you shouldent have to explain this. 2) I am the easiest person to push. 3) You have the wrong analysis for why it would be scummy, it would be that I am pushing on something that should not exist, and you didn't reationalize itl ike that, only that I am objectively wrong, which is factual and llgical, 2 things that sucm enfatuate themselves with.

WHY is it bad to push anyone?? Pushing is how we move forward. Heck, you're pushing people rn,

I'm

arguably an easy push.

[Carcalilly]

Thanks. ;_; It just set off a trigger for me, but I totally get where you're coming from.

Excuse language.


Ok, at this point this is enough
VOTE: Carcalilly

What?

[Carcalilly]

Taco you're doing me a concern ^

How?

I'm aware that I'm tunneling but you're the only one with enough posts to make something solid out of so...
This is about you,

Sergtaco

~ Also threw in a little bit of advice in there because why not

Topic: Klazam Suspicion

23- RVS vote
40- Saying that they're lurking??? (IMO: He's mentioned it many times with Klazam, yet, he hasn't mentioned anyone else who's lurking.)
60- Possible explanation as to why he's getting at them. ("Fight me"?)
124- A vote and scum read without evidence. (Low-key red flag )

IMO: Could this be a scum bussing attempt? Are you trying to get at Klazam? Why be persistent on it, especially with that vote in their absence? They have

one RVS post

.

Topic: Scumhunting

53- Initial show of strong opinions on scumhunting
63- He doesn't "believe in scumhunting" (IMO: It's a reasonable belief. However... keep reading)

IMO: You can consider scumhunting as NAI, but please don't emphasize being against it, as it can be discouraging. We want people to scumhunt, town or scum, because it STILL reveals information. Also, maybe focus on the

results.

This post is a highlight of my results, talking and questioning you was the hunting, for example.

Topic: Lightheartedness

!Now, I don't have anything against lightheartedness, but I just wanted to take this into account.!
IMO: Your posts have been very lighthearted, and I honestly enjoy talking to you because of that. However, I'm not going to ignore possible alt motives.
-I know that posting lightness can help emotionally when you are feeling heavy or guilty. Do you anything to feel guilty about, Taco?
-Provides distraction, keeps the game from moving forward.
-Appeal to emotion. Act friendly and get on people's good side.

Topic: Self Defense

A quick thing, but when I question him, he tends to turn it back against me.
84- A vote after a clash of opinions.
127- I'm suspicious of someone, and I'm "just saying that to look town"? Don't turn to that, that's a very easy and typical defense.

Defend. Yourself.

VOTE: Sergtacos
For now.

Anyway... someone else please come it. I don't like tunnel battles.

What the actual fuck is this? Is this the worst possible attempt at scumreading someone I have ever seen in my life?

Mind giving

constructive

criticism?
And, you said you wanted analysis.

People keep kicking this post. Someone please tell me what's wrong with it. I still don't think I did a bad job.

[Carcalilly]

I do too little they call me scummy
I do too much they call me scummy
Ffs

It's true tho

[Carcalilly]

Taco you're doing me a concern ^

How?

I'm aware that I'm tunneling but you're the only one with enough posts to make something solid out of so...
This is about you,

Sergtaco

~ Also threw in a little bit of advice in there because why not

Topic: Klazam Suspicion

23- RVS vote
40- Saying that they're lurking??? (IMO: He's mentioned it many times with Klazam, yet, he hasn't mentioned anyone else who's lurking.)
60- Possible explanation as to why he's getting at them. ("Fight me"?)
124- A vote and scum read without evidence. (Low-key red flag )

IMO: Could this be a scum bussing attempt? Are you trying to get at Klazam? Why be persistent on it, especially with that vote in their absence? They have

one RVS post

.

Topic: Scumhunting

53- Initial show of strong opinions on scumhunting
63- He doesn't "believe in scumhunting" (IMO: It's a reasonable belief. However... keep reading)

IMO: You can consider scumhunting as NAI, but please don't emphasize being against it, as it can be discouraging. We want people to scumhunt, town or scum, because it STILL reveals information. Also, maybe focus on the

results.

This post is a highlight of my results, talking and questioning you was the hunting, for example.

Topic: Lightheartedness

!Now, I don't have anything against lightheartedness, but I just wanted to take this into account.!
IMO: Your posts have been very lighthearted, and I honestly enjoy talking to you because of that. However, I'm not going to ignore possible alt motives.
-I know that posting lightness can help emotionally when you are feeling heavy or guilty. Do you anything to feel guilty about, Taco?
-Provides distraction, keeps the game from moving forward.
-Appeal to emotion. Act friendly and get on people's good side.

Topic: Self Defense

A quick thing, but when I question him, he tends to turn it back against me.
84- A vote after a clash of opinions.
127- I'm suspicious of someone, and I'm "just saying that to look town"? Don't turn to that, that's a very easy and typical defense.

Defend. Yourself.

VOTE: Sergtacos
For now.

Anyway... someone else please come it. I don't like tunnel battles.

What the actual fuck is this? Is this the worst possible attempt at scumreading someone I have ever seen in my life?

Welcome to my strongtown list.

Why, thanks for not just calling this post shit and giving insight on why it's bad!!1! So helpful.

You know what? Might be a spite post, might not be. "wall incoming"

That's not nice, she was trying.

From the posts you made and the effort you had about reading really makes me believe you're scum.

VOTE: Mulch

If he ain't nice I ain't gonna be nice.

[Sergtacos]

VOTE: Carcalilly

So mulch is town, Branson is town too.

How is mulch town??

How is Branson town??

You're giving me scummy vibes

[Carcalilly]

I did this all on my mobile phone so y'all should be proud.

Brandson is going first...

416 and 417: You low-key blamed me for trying to figure out the RVS interaction... and bring it more into the real game. I asked if it was related to the real game/if it was scummy etc.
Then,

you

go and question a oneliner.

422: This doesn't look too good to me. All the "would" and "why" swip swap could be a way for you to twist my intentions. I literally just said "why".

423: That is an extremely easy off the hook for an extremely scummy post. Are you just gonna like, walk past it and say, meh, looks normal cuz Tacobutt??

516: Good post. Just sayin'

521: New points were brought up. You didn't adress them, you just turned back, like "already taken care of"

767: Empiri made it clear that it was weighing pros and

cons

. Brandson still says it as "no downsides".

769 and 881: My my, things change don't they? It's easy jump on mulchs first posts, though.

Anyway, Mulch is up next.

[Sergtacos]

I can't possibly see mulch and carcalilly be scums together, but if they are, that's amazing bussing tbh.
In between null and lean scjm
Branson
Lean scum
Carcalilly
Vedith

Strong scum
Mulch
Tchill

[ThinkBig]

Bump

[ThinkBig]

Bump

[ThinkBig]

Bump