Pretty well but havent played with him in agesIn post 72, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm curious to know how well Wisdom/slimer know each other and what Wisdom thinks about slimer so far.
Cant say i have a read
Pretty well but havent played with him in agesIn post 72, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm curious to know how well Wisdom/slimer know each other and what Wisdom thinks about slimer so far.
I mean, that part of my response was 100% sarcastic and I thought that was super obvious even without the eyeroll at the end.In post 72, GuiltyLion wrote:]
but I mean like, do you really think slimer is so bad at scum that she would forget where she was currently voting? I thought you might have this kind of intention but it just seems 'too easy'. And I don't necessarily agree that slimer was trying to "discredit" the wagon, I thought she had other motives for what she posted, but I'll let her answer your 63 first this time before jumping in further.
so you ask a low effort question that's not really going to tell you much about someone's alignment, I ask you what you were hoping to do with it, you then sarcastically say it would have told you their alignment, and I'm trying to ask you whether youIn post 77, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I mean, that part of my response was 100% sarcastic and I thought that was super obvious even without the eyeroll at the end.
or what? You're gonna vote me too?In post 69, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You answered my question with a question.In post 66, theslimer3 wrote: Is disliking rvs the same as disliking a wagon?
I'll give you one more chance to try and answer it.
is my town swag that great that I protrude it without even trying? Typically I like attention. Normally that means looking slightly scummy, but at least it draws players to meIn post 70, Infinity 324 wrote:Slimer*In post 68, Infinity 324 wrote:Sometimes has still done nothing but try to look town
Why are you coming at me like you have never seen a low effort question in RVS before?In post 78, GuiltyLion wrote: so you ask a low effort question that's not really going to tell you much about someone's alignment, I ask you what you were hoping to do with it, you then sarcastically say it would have told you their alignment, and I'm trying to ask you whether youreallybelieve that. Are you saying the answer is just "no"? Why am I scummy?
and if you're going to move your vote off of slimer, I'll just say then that I thought their reason for allegedly "discrediting the wagon" was to poke at Infinity whoalsoasked a pretty weak and surface level question. It's entirely reasonable to both be on an RVS wagon and also ask someone else why they're trying to ascribe meaning to an RVS wagon, and I still don't really follow what the point of your line of questioning was.
I'm not, I'm trying to sort you and using a question I didn't like as a good starting point to do it.In post 81, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Why are you coming at me like you have never seen a low effort question in RVS before?
I don't think you have? Like your response was:In post 81, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I have already very clearly shown my reasoning for why I asked Slimer that question - if you're struggling to grasp what it was, that isn't my problem.
which you then later said was sarcastic. So I don't feel my original question was ever truly answered. How would your original question help you sort slimer?In post 64, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Well, I was hoping he would have said he disliked it. Then I could have said 'Ah ha, you were on the wagon though! Conf!Scum for forgetting you were on the wagon!
Uh, what? Town or scum can miss sarcasm, it's incredibly easy to misread tone in text. I also don't think sarcasm is ever really very pro-town to employ as it generally obfuscates what you're trying to say, but unfortunately many people on this site like to use it regardless of their alignment.In post 81, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:The fact you missed the sarcasm makes me think you're probably scum as scum tend to miss the tone of posts a lot more than town.
whoops, you're right, my mistake.In post 81, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I also don't believe I was voting Slimer at any point in this game. Not yet anyway.
I don't believe slimer was discrediting the wagon - I thought I made this pretty clear when I stated:In post 81, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Why did you say 'allegedly' discrediting the wagon? That doesn't fit in with what you're trying to show with your thought process. Did you think she was discrediting the wagon or not? Because if you don't then I don't see where your line of thinking comes from on Slimer (unless you just made it up?) And if you do, well, I don't see why you're questioning my position on that issue.
Which is it?
In post 72, GuiltyLion wrote:And I don't necessarily agree that slimer was trying to "discredit" the wagon, I thought she had other motives for what she posted, but I'll let her answer your 63 first this time before jumping in further.
Also, I don't think I'm really pushing you or selling a narrative here. I've voted you but never said that you're scum, as I don't have any particularly strong reads yet. Where in my posts are you getting the impression that I'm pushing you for lynch?In post 78, GuiltyLion wrote:and if you're going to move your vote off of slimer, I'll just say then that I thought their reason for allegedly "discrediting the wagon" was to poke at Infinity who also asked a pretty weak and surface level question. It's entirely reasonable to both be on an RVS wagon and also ask someone else why they're trying to ascribe meaning to an RVS wagon, and I still don't really follow what the point of your line of questioning was.
In post 83, GuiltyLion wrote: I don't think you have?
This is why I asked the question - we have been discussing this over the past few posts and I can't quite believe I'm having to quote this.In post 63, BlueBloodedToffee wrote: Then why did you try to discredit and play down what was obviously a RVS wagon before the person being wagoned has a chance to respond?
Nah, scum tend to focus on the content of a post as opposed to town who try to understand the emotion/viewpoint behind a post as well as the content.In post 83, GuiltyLion wrote:Uh, what? Town or scum can miss sarcasm, it's incredibly easy to misread tone in text.
You're right - why would I take you voting me and then attacking my questioning of another player as a sign you wanted to lynch me. I'm crazy. Is there anyone else you're trying not to lynch? Or just me? (<<More sarcasm)In post 83, GuiltyLion wrote:Also, I don't think I'm really pushing you or selling a narrative here. I've voted you but never said that you're scum, as I don't have any particularly strong reads yet. Where in my posts are you getting the impression that I'm pushing you for lynch?
yah, pretty much everyone atm. the game just startedIn post 84, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Is there anyone else you're trying not to lynch?
I dunno. I'm keeping my eyes on BBT right now. He seems to be searching for a reason to find someone to be scummy rather than finding out if someone is or not. Could just be RQS hijinks thoughIn post 80, Infinity 324 wrote:Where are you trying to look for scum right now
can you elaborate on thisIn post 86, theslimer3 wrote:He seems to be searching for a reason to find someone to be scummy rather than finding out if someone is or not.
In post 27, Infinity 324 wrote:Java what do you make of the wagon on you?
How is this not discrediting? Infinity is attempting to gauge the reaction of somebody being wagoned (genuine or otherwise) and before the person being wagoned can respond Slimer implies the wagon has no real power/purpose effectively easing any concerns around the wagon that Java might have had.In post 28, theslimer3 wrote:Other than the fact that it's made up from rvs and no real serious thought went into his wagon at all?
But presumably java already knows it's a RVS wagon with no real serious thought in it, because that's what it was. I thought Infinity's question was pretty toothless and I don't think scum!java would have a hard time responding to it. Java gave a response any way in 33, would you say this wasn't a useful response because of slimer's post?In post 88, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:How is this not discrediting? Infinity is attempting to gauge the reaction of somebody being wagoned (genuine or otherwise) and before the person being wagoned can respond Slimer implies the wagon has no real power/purpose effectively easing any concerns around the wagon that Java might have had.
It completely kills any type of useful response we could have received when the wagon is effectively stopped before it even got going.
The power of L-1 doesn't exist when a player on the wagon already expresses the futility of it.In post 91, GuiltyLion wrote:Sure, but that's the power of L-1, not pretending that the things that slimer pointed out aren't true. If you want to scrutinize someone for deflating a useful wagon, you should be looking at beeboy first IMO
do you honestly believe this or are you just arguing for the sake of arguing now? Not_Mafia could lolhammer at L-1 regardless of why people voted or what thoughts they currently have about the wagon. As long as the votes stay there, the pressure is there, even if every voter says that they're townreading java and they don't want him to be lynched.In post 92, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:The power of L-1 doesn't exist when a player on the wagon already expresses the futility of it.
Who the hell would ever do something like that??In post 90, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:It doesn't matter whether he knows it's RVS or not - people have been hammered on page 1 before and nobody likes that to happen to them.
What do you think of guilty's questioning of him? And why didn't you have any questions of your own?In post 86, theslimer3 wrote:I dunno. I'm keeping my eyes on BBT right now. He seems to be searching for a reason to find someone to be scummy rather than finding out if someone is or not. Could just be RQS hijinks thoughIn post 80, Infinity 324 wrote:Where are you trying to look for scum right now
Out of all his posts here, only 1 isn't related to BBT.In post 96, Infinity 324 wrote:What do you think of guilty's questioning of him? And why didn't you have any questions of your own?In post 86, theslimer3 wrote:I dunno. I'm keeping my eyes on BBT right now. He seems to be searching for a reason to find someone to be scummy rather than finding out if someone is or not. Could just be RQS hijinks thoughIn post 80, Infinity 324 wrote:Where are you trying to look for scum right now
Other than his initial questioning being weak and directing towards conclusions that seem a bit absurd?In post 87, GuiltyLion wrote:can you elaborate on thisIn post 86, theslimer3 wrote:He seems to be searching for a reason to find someone to be scummy rather than finding out if someone is or not.