Yes, I do, because it's boring, pointless, and would be better focused on you actually trying to find scum.
I've read the last few pages. What happened was Treblesome is voting you for ~room things~ which may or may not be scummy, you responded with hyperagression, and Treblesome scumread you for that. Tell me if I missed anything. I might respond to more details later, but it's not my highest priority. I'm not discrediting your vote.
Why would I need to discredit a vote that doesn't even have any reasoning?
Read your 2 bolded sentences again, my vote is still legitimate and trying to find scum, you saying it has no reasoning is a lie, and you are trying to discredit my vote in the very same post your asking why you would need to discredit it.
Returning win rate: 4/1, 80%
In the process of creating a game to mod, we will see what it holds.
You're not even pushing me for reactions though. What you are basically doing is continuing with a "reaction" test vote on Page 7, without even pushing me on reactions.
Reasoning doesn't matter if the reasoning doesn't make me scum at all. VOTE: JasonWazza
No, you're reacting to me. I'm asking you questions. You responded unsatisfactorily. This doesn't mean you have actually been reaction-testing me.
I'm concerned about your vote on me because I think it comes from scum. If I was actually concerned about my ~wagon of rvsness~ I'd be pushing on all of the votes, or at least ones that actually gave reasons for me to be scum.
@WB, can you explain where your fascination with me comes from? At least half your posts in this game have centered around me. I get the impression you've been trying to pressure me and make me uncomfortable, which would explain the empty threat to lynch me in post 28. You claim you want to make scum uncomfortable, but I don't see why you'd scum read me, especially so early as you apparently did. Can you clarify?
I do have a slight town lean on WB for this very reason. I'm not sure if WB's interest in me could be called tunneling exactly, but in my limited experience, following someone around like this is more of a town thing to do, whereas scum would be more open to going after the next best thing.
Poor choice of words in my last sentence. I'm saying that scum would be more likely to flirt around with the most likely wagons to be lynched, and less likely to stay on one person consistently.
I only have an eye of who's posted and I want to have my vote on who I can consider a sr at this point
Nothing personal
"Do you want to lynch you?" Is a largely useless question. I wasn't pushing you seriously before
I want beeboy and edo to post more. I want Zulfy to post. I have trs on MM4 Jason and Treble right now. Sobolev Space hasn't necessarily made a negative impression on me.
I just think you've played a pretty safe game here. You ask a lot of questions and your stances are safe. I don't know you or how you play so I'm just going off what I feel from your posts total.
It's also pretty early for me to be actually tunneling anyone.
In post 123, Treblesome wrote:There's no read on Jason though.
Like to parse this, your statement is we're town, you don't see scum motivation in what we're doing, but because of neighbourhood it sounds like they would have justification for misreading.
Why can't be right? Why is Jason town in your eyes?
It's not so much that I was town-reading Jason (although I lean slightly more town on him now since last night). I just felt like the argument was more likely to be T vs T. I don't think Jason's neighborhood reaction to your "slip" was necessarily indicative of any one alignment. At the time, I was fairly null on both your slots, and therefore used the approach I picked up from mastina: if you can't really discern the alignments in an argument, town vs town is the safer bet until more information becomes available. You may or may not agree with that, but it's how I do it.
I'm not a huge fan of reads lists, but to organize my current thoughts a little better:
More townish:
MarioManiac4
Sobolev Space
JasonWazza
Writers Bloque
Treblesome
More scummish (based mostly on POE):
Edosurist
beeboy
Zulfy
In post 158, Writers Bloque wrote:
I just think you've played a pretty safe game here. You ask a lot of questions and your stances are safe. I don't know you or how you play so I'm just going off what I feel from your posts total.
That's just how my early play is. I'm always a late bloomer, gaining more confidence and conviction as more clues are available. My Day 1 scum-hunting is pretty garbage I'll admit.
As a reminder in case it gets overlooked, Edosurist's vote on beeboy didn't make sense, when the rest of his post seemed to be pressuring Mario instead. I don't know if it was a mistake or what.
In post 156, GinghamDog wrote:but in my limited experience, following someone around like this is more of a town thing to do, whereas scum would be more open to going after the next best thing.
Why do you think town/scum do this? Generally, I see the opposite.
Just going by my experience. A town player will pick up on something they think is scummy and zero in on that player with a death grip, believing they're catching scum when they really aren't, whereas scum will keep their options open and usually not pressure a player who hasn't received much attention beforehand. I'm sure the opposite is capable of happening, but again, just my experience.
In post 147, JasonWazza wrote:Why is it the first thing back you do is try and discredit the vote and not react to anything else that happened in 3/4 pages?
In post 147, JasonWazza wrote:Why is it the first thing back you do is try and discredit the vote and not react to anything else that happened in 3/4 pages?
