Mini Normal 1923: BooneyToonz IV - Five Weeks in a Boon END

Sergtacos · Post Post #876 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 2:41 pm

In post 823, Boonskiies wrote:
Vedith has replaced Keychain.

VEDITHHHH!!!!!

Geralt of Rivia · Post Post #877 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 2:49 pm

Who is this....vedith??m

Can he be trusted with fireworks?

Mulch · Post Post #878 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 2:56 pm

In post 877, Geralt of Rivia wrote:Who is this....vedith??m

Can he be trusted with fireworks?

I'm sort of getting scummy vibes from him :/

Sergtacos · Post Post #879 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 2:57 pm

In post 877, Geralt of Rivia wrote:Who is this....vedith??m

Can he be trusted with fireworks?

Vedith is at scum hunting. Tbh I'm glad he's in this game, my head hurts from trying to figure out who is scum.

Sergtacos · Post Post #880 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:42 pm

In post 879, Sergtacos wrote:
In post 877, Geralt of Rivia wrote:Who is this....vedith??m

Can he be trusted with fireworks?
Vedith is at scum hunting. Tbh I'm glad he's in this game, my head hurts from trying to figure out who is scum.

Good at scum hunting*

Geralt of Rivia · Post Post #881 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:55 pm

Lol. Was wondering when you were going to catch that

Sergtacos · Post Post #882 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 6:52 pm

In post 881, Geralt of Rivia wrote:Lol. Was wondering when you were going to catch that

Was busy playing Breath of the Wild lol

Fykus · Post Post #883 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 6:53 pm

This new sword challenge is a pain in my ass!

Fykus · Post Post #884 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:28 pm

Here you go mulch my love, a couple good posts from deas. My read on him is null leaning town.

Spoiler:

In post 299, DeasVail wrote:Eh , I'll just do it now.

To me, Klazam is giving off the impression of his posting being for show rather than actually sincere. There's a lot of talking about how he needs to get a read on Maestro and then the following 'woe is me' period where we stuffed it up guys! We stuffed up his grand plan to get a read on Maestro even though he wasn't trying very hard. I mean, he told Maestro to ignore a large portion of the game because he's somehow the authority on what is worthwhile reading and what's not? And wasn't interested in what Maestro thought of those pages?

But now we have a magical town read on Maestro so it's okay.

And now there's a lot of engaging with Maestro trying to get him to lead things without providing much in the way of contribution himself. Which would make sense if he was trying to get a read on Maestro but Maestro is apparently definitely town so he's not.

My scumread is fairly week all in all and the above is much more a collection of rambly thoughts than a case.

In post 629, DeasVail wrote:
In post 624, Mulch wrote:LMAO desasvil just ignoring me
What would like me to respond to?
In post 627, Klazam wrote:Deas, I am indecisive. That's not a scumtell, it's a nulltell
It's not the indecision, but the way in which it is presented. It's incredibly passive. You're not asking a specific person or people to help you out with reading SAIHAG, but using the "someone", which has the advantage of looking like you're ~thinking about things~ and keen to have the advice of the town, but is actually unlikely to achieve anything in reality. If you were interested in a specific person's opinion then that would seem more genuine to me, but the entire post feels more for show to me, in order to look like your ~genuinely scumhunting~.

In post 739, DeasVail wrote:Mulch, your points on me seem to amount to the following:
- not liking my tone, which is fair but nothing I can productively respond to.
- Thinking my questions are scummy.
- My focus on engaging Fykus (which would make sense considering his lack of engagement at the time.
- me not responding to the above points despite there being nothing to respond to.
- me correcting a mistake in a post

Not liking my tone is fine and the three questions post was already brought up by keyser and I thought that was reasonable, but the stuff that comes after it is comparatively super weak and gives off the impression of grasping at straws to justify your bravado. Expecting me to respond/calling out the fact that I was not responding was also strange because it's like you're trying to make me look worse, but there was no reason for me to respond to you at that point. In fact a few of your posts seem suspicious for trying to make me look more scummy than you have reason to believe I am.

What do you think of this?

Also Creative, the implication of me not calling someone town my reads post is that I think they might be scum.

Sergtacos · Post Post #885 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:58 pm

In post 883, Fykus wrote:This new sword challenge is a pain in my ass!

I just started lol

Fykus · Post Post #886 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 8:05 pm

oh, you're in for a hell of a ride then, the worlds so big!

Vedith · Post Post #887 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:43 pm

In post 876, Sergtacos wrote:VEDITHHHH!!!!!

TAACCCOOOO!!!!!

In post 877, Geralt of Rivia wrote:Can he be trusted with fireworks?

Are you threatened by me?

In post 878, Mulch wrote:I'm sort of getting scummy vibes from him :/

Then stop getting that vibe!

I got a few things to do at work, but other than that I'm pretty free today.

Fykus · Post Post #888 (ISO) » Sun Jul 02, 2017 11:43 pm

hooray

DeasVail · Post Post #889 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 1:10 am

In post 799, Sergtacos wrote:Just fyi people, Klazam likes to hard buss. So if he flip scums the person who he tried to put the blame on has a high percentage of being scum. At least I think. But I know for sure Klazam likes to hard buss.

Why are you saying this now?

UNVOTE: Klazam
VOTE: Mulch

There is an alarming lack of willingness to engage with me despite me being Mulch's top scumread.
The Fykus-DV conspiracy scumteam theory does not work nearly as well without one of us flipping scum, and I've provided two opportunities for Mulch to have dialogue with me, but he's just... chosen not to? There's almost a sense of desperation to retain his scumread on me and not engage with me at risk of being unable to sustain it.

There is lots of bravado (relating to not being able to use meta on him because scumgame = towngame, me outing myself as scum, the fact that town should be listening to him and vote me before fykus even though he thinks we're both scum), but surprisingly little substance or effort of investigation behind it.

His post just feel hollow to me.

DeasVail · Post Post #890 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 1:23 am

Hmm, the more I think about it, the more I really am suspicious of Mulch's lack of engagement with me. He has been relentlessly pushing this scumread of me, and again, both times I've directly approached him, I have kind of been snubbed, which doesn't make all that much sense. I would expect there to be more effort put in to solidifying his read of me, and less into an attempt to strongarm the town at this stage considering the lack of material he has on me (when it comes down to it).

The three questions theory is fine, but doesn't have the same kind of backing behind it, and sergtacos' mentioning Mulch having used this in a previous game as town increases my suspicion, as it would be convenient for scum-Mulch to copy reasoning from one of his town-games, playing to his town-meta. However, this is kind of undone by the fact that the three questions reasoning is much more of a novelty in the setting of not having had any flips. And I suspect that Mulch is smart enough to know this.

Geralt of Rivia · Post Post #891 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 1:24 am

Are you threatened by me?

Nah.

Vedith · Post Post #892 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 1:52 am

In post 891, Geralt of Rivia wrote:

Are you threatened by me?

Nah.

That's your first mistake.
Who's scum, why should I not vote you over that person or persons?

Geralt of Rivia · Post Post #893 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:08 am

My first mistake? Care to point out what my second would be?

I've got nothing to hide so I'm not afraid of you.

As to who to vote for, I don't have concrete proof that anyone is scum. So I can't give you a definatel target. Yet.

Though I can suggest fykus based off previous interaction and mulch also. The others not sure.

Vedith · Post Post #894 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:22 am

In post 893, Geralt of Rivia wrote:My first mistake? Care to point out what my second would be?

I've got nothing to hide so I'm not afraid of you.

As to who to vote for, I don't have concrete proof that anyone is scum. So I can't give you a definatel target. Yet.

Though I can suggest fykus based off previous interaction and mulch also. The others not sure.

Don't worry I'll point out your first mistake.

I don't want proof I want who's Scum.

What didn't you like with Fykus interaction?
Mulch is town locked day 1

Geralt of Rivia · Post Post #895 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:26 am

Can't tell you who's scum - don't know.

Geralt of Rivia · Post Post #896 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:30 am

In post 153, Fykus wrote:If you guys could tell me what teams youre on thatd be great

In post 814, Fykus wrote:Im vt. Go ahead and lynch me

I don't like the above about fykus. Especially the first post there.

Vedith · Post Post #897 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:31 am

In post 895, Geralt of Rivia wrote:Can't tell you who's scum - don't know.

Then do better.

Vedith · Post Post #898 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:32 am

In post 896, Geralt of Rivia wrote:
In post 153, Fykus wrote:If you guys could tell me what teams youre on thatd be great

In post 814, Fykus wrote:Im vt. Go ahead and lynch me

I don't like the above about fykus. Especially the first post there.

What don't you like about then?

Geralt of Rivia · Post Post #899 (ISO) » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:45 am

In post 898, Vedith wrote:
In post 896, Geralt of Rivia wrote:
In post 153, Fykus wrote:If you guys could tell me what teams youre on thatd be great

In post 814, Fykus wrote:Im vt. Go ahead and lynch me

I don't like the above about fykus. Especially the first post there.
What don't you like about then?

Asking people's roles? Scummy move.

Saying you're VT - kind of scummy. Even though he could be telling the truth.