Mini Normal 1925: Complete

[firecrocer]

Ah, I thought you meant the other one, and meeeh it's a stretch, maybe he found your sup scummy, number 12 obviously is a lie though.
Also, excuse my newbness, do we know the setup of this game?

[Elena Fisher]

We do not why ask that question though? I don't really see the point.

[Robbnva]

I hate dishonest people. Right now my vote is more of a serious pl vote because I can't work with people I trust and even if he could somehow convince me he is town, I can't work with him.

I'll try and work with others though but please nobody else lie. Lying sucks.

I'm letting ircher's fake post restriction slide for now cause it was amusing. It isn't anymore though so he should stop

[firecrocer]

Just trying to figure out where we stand,
So this game can have any roles that are considered normal? And we don't know the scum members?

[Ircher]

[]On the sixth post, I VOTE: Former.

I found it to be very good indeed.[/i]

So what is it, you're acting too scummy to be scum trying to see who will push you first? Vote hopping trying to hit the whole player list? I'm your 5th vote in 3 pages, we appear to have an actual game to play now, care to play with us?

Wrong. You are my sixth vote.

[Gratiae]

Whoa! Serious actions have been acting up here.
@Robbnva: Who can you trust in this game atm? Wouldn't you say that at this phase you can't trust noone but yourself?

I'll need some help with some clarifications. In this game are two factions that are anti-town?

[MarioManiac4]

VOTE: Robbnva

[firecrocer]

Hey grat! Enjoying that handbag ?
And hey MM4

[MarioManiac4]

Hi firecroc!

[Gratiae]

Hi guys! Lol Yeah, it goes well with my fur.

[Creature]

If you didn't forget ThinkBig is playing, he's likely town.

[ThinkBig]

If you didn't forget ThinkBig is playing, he's likely town.

After Newbie 1796, I do not believe that my activity meta is reliable.

[ThinkBig]

I hate dishonest people. Right now my vote is more of a serious pl vote because I can't work with people I trust and even if he could somehow convince me he is town, I can't work with him.

I'll try and work with others though but please nobody else lie. Lying sucks.

I'm letting ircher's fake post restriction slide for now cause it was amusing. It isn't anymore though so he should stop

Creature's quick RVS vote after saying he won't RVS vote is not scum alignment indicative. Sadly, townies do lie and I really question whether or not Creature's lie was AI.

Ircher's quick vote hopping is far more alignment indicative IMO.

[Ircher]

Spoiler: Reads

Confirmed Town

(From my perspective) (98%-100% Confidence)
Ircher  (100%) - Role PM

Likely Town

(85%-97% Confidence)
Mario (+88%) - 44 is a great vote. I like 81 as well.

Leaning Town

(60%-84% Confidence)
Elena (+70%) - 52 is a reasonable vote.

Null

(0% - 30% Confidence; No/Very Weak Read)
Zach (-20%) - His vote in 35 must be serious, but why Creature?

Neutral

(31%-59% Confidence; Mixed Read)
DrumBeats (-31%) - 34 just seems too early.... Idk, maybe I'm just a little biased?
ThinkBig (-45%) - 22 is quite bad. Yes, I was "vote hopping". So what? Like, you're just trying to find something to scumread me for at that point.
Creature (-50%) - 62 seems like a scum theatrical post.
Gratiae (-52%) - 80 is suspect.... Interesting how both Firecrocer and you are both super-interested in the setup....
Firecrocer (-55%) - 59 is a bad entrance.. 61 proves that's the case. 78 is really suspicious... You've been on-site long enough to been through a single game, yes? Why do you keep asking those kinds of questions?

Leaning Scum

(60%-75% Confidence)
Formerfish (-65%) - Way too dramatic in 38. 40 is just bad. (Also, is that comment to me or ThinkBig? If it is to ThinkBig.... why did you vote me?) The aggression in 41 totally isn't necessary. Trying to backtrack in 42 by sayng his posts eren't meant to be super aggro.... except his tone says something completely different.... Super aggro tone in 57 again....

Likely Scum

(76%-100% Confidence)
Robbnva (-80%) - The Creature policy-lynch suggestion in 53 is bad.... Not to mention that your argument holds zero weight when Creature's vote was an RVS vote.... 68 makes me lean toward scum vs. scum w/ Creature. 77 really sounds like scum... Definitely anti-town.

Spoiler: How to read this readslist

Players are placed in different sections based on my confidence in the read expressed as a percentage. A positive percentage indicates that I leans towards town on a player whereas a negative percentage indicates I lean towards scum on a player. Please note that the Null an Neutral sections contain both townreads and scumreads and you must look a the sign of the percentage in parenthesis to determine which way I lean.

Confidence ratings are rough estimates and are relative to one another. In addition, they tend to be scored on a logarithmic scale versus a linear scale; in other words, the difference between 0% and 30% tends to be greater than ther difference between 30% and 60%.

[Ircher]

Also, VOTE: Robb.

[Creature]

Did anyone even read what was my first post?

[ThinkBig]

@Creature - Yes, I did read what your first post was.

Gonna wait for a scummy post before voting.

Sup

VOTE: Robbnva

Robbnva's entrance is not scummy.

[ThinkBig]

The time between your first post and your vote was <1 minute.

[Ircher]

@Creature -- Yes, why do you ask?

[ThinkBig]

Likely Town (85%-97% Confidence)
Mario (+88%) - 44 is a great vote. I like 81 as well.

Yuck. Both these votes are totally naked.

[Ircher]

They require no explanation. Mario is thinking in a way that I find to be town.

[ThinkBig]

They require no explanation.

Mario is thinking in a way that I find to be town.

And what exactly is Mario thinking? I did not quite follow his thought process with two naked votes. I interpreted both votes as RVS/semi-RVS and took neither one of them seriously.

[Ircher]

That answer should be kinda obvious from my readslist.

And no, I didn't interpret them as RVS....

[MarioManiac4]

They were both serious.

[Dierfire]

Bump